"git commit --dry-run" reported "No, no, you cannot commit." in one
case where "git commit" would have allowed you to commit, and this
improves it a little bit ("git commit --dry-run --short" still does
not give you the correct answer, for example). This is a stop-gap
measure in that "commit --short --dry-run" still gives an incorrect
result.
* ss/commit-dry-run-resolve-merge-to-no-op:
wt-status.c: set commitable bit if there is a meaningful merge.
When f9568530 (builtin-commit: resurrect behavior for multiple -m
options, 2007-11-11) converted a "char *message" to "struct strbuf
message" to hold the messages given with the "-m" option, it
incorrectly changed the checks "did we get a message with the -m
option?" to "is message.len 0?". Later, we noticed one breakage
from this change and corrected it with 25206778 (commit: don't start
editor if empty message is given with -m, 2013-05-25).
However, "we got a message with -m, even though an empty one, so we
shouldn't be launching an editor" was not the only breakage.
* "git commit --amend -m '' --allow-empty", even though it looks
strange, is a valid request to amend the commit to have no
message at all. Due to the misdetection of the presence of -m on
the command line, we ended up keeping the log messsage from the
original commit.
* "git commit -m "$msg" -F file" should be rejected whether $msg is
an empty string or not, but due to the same bug, was not rejected
when $msg is empty.
* "git -c template=file -m "$msg"" should ignore the template even
when $msg is empty, but it didn't and instead used the contents
from the template file.
Correct these by checking have_option_m, which the earlier 25206778
introduced to fix the same bug.
Reported-by: Adam Dinwoodie <adam@dinwoodie.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
`git commit --amend -m ''` seems to be an unambiguous request to blank a
commit message, but it actually leaves the commit message as-is. That's
the case regardless of whether `--allow-empty-message` is specified, and
doesn't so much as drop a non-zero return code.
Add failing tests to show this behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Adam Dinwoodie <adam@dinwoodie.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The 'commit --dry-run' and 'commit' return values differed if a
conflicted merge had been resolved and the resulting commit would
record the same tree as the parent.
Update show_merge_in_progress to set the commitable bit if conflicts
have been resolved and a merge is in progress.
Signed-off-by: Stephen P. Smith <ischis2@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Right now we pass off the string found by "--date" straight
to the fmt_ident function, which will use our strict
parse_date to normalize it. However, this means obvious
things like "--date=now" or "--date=2.days.ago" will not
work.
Instead, let's fallback to the approxidate function to
handle this for us. Note that we must try parse_date
ourselves first, even though approxidate will try strict
parsing itself. The reason is that approxidate throws away
any timezone information it sees from the strict parsing,
and we want to preserve it. So asking for:
git commit --date="@1234567890 -0700"
continues to set the date in -0700, regardless of what the
local timezone is.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we make a commit and the author is not the same as the
committer (e.g., because you used "-c $commit" or
"--author=$somebody"), we print the author's name and email
in both the commit-message template and as part of the
commit summary. This is a safety check to give the user a
chance to confirm that we are doing what they expect.
This patch brings the same safety for the "date" field,
which may be set by "-c" or by using "--date". Note that we
explicitly do not set it for $GIT_AUTHOR_DATE, as it is
probably not of interest when "git commit" is being fed its
parameters by a script.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In particular, show that --short and --porcelain, while implying
--dry-run, do not return the same exit code as --dry-run. This is due to
the wt_status.commitable flag being set only when a long status is
requested.
No fix is provided here; with [1], it should be trivial to fix though -
just a matter of calling wt_status_mark_commitable().
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/242489
Signed-off-by: Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
t7501.9 tries to check that "git commit" will fail when the
index is unchanged. It relies on previous tests not to have
modified the index. When it was originally written, this was
always the case. However, commit c65dc35 (t7501: test the
right kind of breakage, 2012-03-30) changed earlier tests (4
and 5) to leave a modification in the index.
We never noticed, however, because t7501.7, between the two,
clears the index state as a side effect. However, that test
depends on the PERL prerequisite, and so it does not always
run. Therefore if NO_PERL is set, we do not run the
intervening test, the index is left unclean, and t7501.9
fails.
We could fix this by moving t7501.9 up in the script.
However, this patch instead leaves it in place and adds a
"git reset" before the commit. This makes the test more
explicit about its preconditions, and will future-proof it
against any other changes in the test state.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the test 'using invalid commit with -C' git-commit would have failed
even if the -C option had been given the correct commit, as there was
nothing to commit. Pass --allow-empty to make sure it would make a commit,
were there no issues with the argument given to the -C option.
Signed-off-by: Kacper Kornet <draenog@pld-linux.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There are some index handling subtleties in 'commit --only' that are
best tested when we have an existing index, but an unborn or empty
HEAD. These circumstances are easily produced by 'checkout --orphan',
but we did not previously have a test for it.
The main expected failure mode would be: erroneously loading the
existing index contents when building the temporary index that is used
for --only. Cf.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/225969
and subsequent discussion.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git commit --amend --only --" was meant to allow "Clever" people to
rewrite the commit message without making any change even when they
have already changes for the next commit added to their index, but
it never worked as advertised since it was introduced in 1.3.0 era.
* jk/maint-commit-amend-only-no-paths:
commit: fix "--amend --only" with no pathspec
"commit --amend" used to refuse amending a commit with an empty log
message, with or without "--allow-empty-message".
* cw/amend-commit-without-message:
Allow edit of empty message with commit --amend
Due to the way "git diff --no-index" is bolted onto by touching the
low level code that is shared with the rest of the "git diff" code,
even though it has to work in a very different way, any comparison
that involves a file "-" at the root level incorrectly tried to read
from the standard input. This cleans up the no-index codepath
further to remove code that reads from the standard input from the
core side, which is never necessary when git is running its usual
diff operation.
* jc/refactor-diff-stdin:
diff-index.c: "git diff" has no need to read blob from the standard input
diff-index.c: unify handling of command line paths
diff-index.c: do not pretend paths are pathspecs
When we do not have any pathspec, we typically disallow an
explicit "--only", because it makes no sense (your commit
would, by definition, be empty). But since 6a74642
(git-commit --amend: two fixes., 2006-04-20), we have
allowed "--amend --only" with the intent that it would amend
the commit, ignoring any contents staged in the index.
However, while that commit allowed the combination, we never
actually implemented the logic to make it work. The current
code notices that we have no pathspec and assumes we want to
do an as-is commit (i.e., the "--only" is ignored).
Instead, we must make sure to follow the partial-commit
code-path. We also need to tweak the list_paths function to
handle a NULL pathspec.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git commit --amend" used on a commit with an empty message fails
unless -m is given, whether or not --allow-empty-message is
specified.
Allow it to proceed to the editor with an empty commit message.
Unless --allow-empty-message is in force, it will still abort later
if an empty message is saved from the editor (this check was
already necessary to prevent a non-empty commit message being edited
to an empty one).
Add a test for --amend --edit of an empty commit message which fails
without this fix, as it's a rare case that won't get frequently
tested otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Chris Webb <chris@arachsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Only "diff --no-index -" does. Bolting the logic into the low-level
function diff_populate_filespec() was a layering violation from day
one. Move populate_from_stdin() function out of the generic diff.c
to its only user, diff-index.c.
Also make sure "-" from the command line stays a special token "read
from the standard input", even if we later decide to sanitize the
result from prefix_filename() function in a few obvious ways,
e.g. removing unnecessary "./" prefix, duplicated slashes "//" in
the middle, etc.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the user exited editor without editing the commit log template given
by "git commit -t <template>", the commit was aborted (correct) with an
error message that said "due to empty commit message" (incorrect).
This was because the original template support was done by piggybacking on
the check to detect an empty log message. Split the codepaths into two
independent checks to clarify the error.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When "-t template" and "-F msg" options are both given (or worse yet,
there is "commit.template" configuration but a message is given in some
other way), the documentation says that template is ignored. However,
the "has the user edited the message?" check still used the contents of
the template file as the basis of the emptyness check.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These tests try to run "git commit" with various "forbidden" combinations
of options and expect the command to fail, but they do so without having
any change added to the index. We wouldn't be able to catch breakages
that would allow these combinations by mistake with them because the
command will fail with "nothing to commit" anyway.
Make sure we have something added to the index before running the command.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A quick test to make sure git doesn't lose the functionality added by
the recent patch "commit: honor --no-edit", plus another test to check
the classical --edit use case (use with "-m").
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Put the opening quote starting each test on the same line as the
test_expect_* invocation. While at it:
- guard commands that prepare test input for individual tests in
the same test_expect_success, so their scope is clearer and
errors at that stage can be caught;
- use the compare_diff_patch helper function when comparing patches;
- use single-quotes in preference to double-quotes and <<\EOF in
preference to <<EOF, to save readers the trouble of looking for
variable interpolations;
- lift the setting of the $author variable used throughout the
test script to the top of the test script;
- include "setup" in the titles of test assertions that prepare for
later ones to make it more obvious which tests can be skipped;
- use test_must_fail instead of "if ...; then:; else false; fi",
for clarity and to catch segfaults when they happen;
- break up some pipelines into separate commands that read and write
to ordinary files, and test the exit status at each stage;
- chain commands with &&. Breaks in a test assertion's && chain can
potentially hide failures from earlier commands in the chain;
- combine two initial tests that do not make as much sense alone.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The rev-list output in this test depends on the details of test_tick's
dummy dates and the choice of hash function. Worse, it depends on the
order and nature of commits made in the earlier tests, so adding new
tests or rearranging existing ones breaks it.
It would be nice to check that "git commit" and commit-tree name
objects consistently and that commit objects' text is as documented,
but this particular test checks everything at once and hence is not a
robust test for that. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This test wants to modify a file and commit the change, but because of
a missing separator between commands it is parsed as a single "echo"
command.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* ci/commit--interactive-atomic:
Test atomic git-commit --interactive
Add commit to list of config.singlekey commands
Add support for -p/--patch to git-commit
Allow git commit --interactive with paths
t7501.8: feed a meaningful command
Use a temporary index for git commit --interactive
Make git commit --interactive feel more like git add --interactive by
allowing the user to restrict the list of files they have to deal with.
A test in t7501 used to ensure that this is not allowed; no need for that
anymore.
Signed-off-by: Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The command expects "git commit --interactive <path>" to fail because you
cannot (yet) limit "commit --interactive" with a pathspec, but even if the
command allowed to take <path>, the test would have failed as saying just
7:quit would leave the index the same as the current commit, leading to an
attempt to create an empty commit that would fail without --allow-empty.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Gettextize the "# Initial commit" message. A test in t7501-commit.sh
explicitly checked for this message. Change it to skip under
GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If the user gives "git commit --date=foobar", we silently
ignore the --date flag. We should note the error.
This patch puts the fix at the lowest level of fmt_ident,
which means it also handles GIT_AUTHOR_DATE=foobar, as well.
There are two down-sides to this approach:
1. Technically this breaks somebody doing something like
"git commit --date=now", which happened to work because
bogus data is the same as "now". Though we do
explicitly handle the empty string, so anybody passing
an empty variable through the environment will still
work.
If the error is too much, perhaps it can be downgraded
to a warning?
2. The error checking happens _after_ the commit message
is written, which can be annoying to the user. We can
put explicit checks closer to the beginning of
git-commit, but that feels a little hack-ish; suddenly
git-commit has to care about how fmt_ident works. Maybe
we could simply call fmt_ident earlier?
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Teaches 'git commit --amend' to copy notes. The catch is that this
must also be guarded by --no-post-rewrite, which we use to prevent
--amend from copying notes during a rebase -i 'edit'/'reword'.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jk/warn-author-committer-after-commit:
user_ident_sufficiently_given(): refactor the logic to be usable from elsewhere
commit.c::print_summary: do not release the format string too early
commit: allow suppression of implicit identity advice
commit: show interesting ident information in summary
strbuf: add strbuf_addbuf_percentquote
strbuf_expand: convert "%%" to "%"
Conflicts:
builtin-commit.c
ident.c
There are a few cases of user identity information that we consider
interesting:
(1) When the author and committer identities do not match.
(2) When the committer identity was picked automatically from the
username, hostname and GECOS information.
In these cases, we already show the information in the commit
message template. However, users do not always see that template
because they might use "-m" or "-F". With this patch, we show these
interesting cases after the commit, along with the subject and
change summary. The new output looks like:
$ git commit \
-m "federalist papers" \
--author='Publius <alexander@hamilton.com>'
[master 3d226a7] federalist papers
Author: Publius <alexander@hamilton.com>
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
for case (1), and:
$ git config --global --unset user.name
$ git config --global --unset user.email
$ git commit -m foo
[master 7c2a927] foo
Committer: Jeff King <peff@c-71-185-130-222.hsd1.va.comcast.net>
Your name and email address were configured automatically based
on your username and hostname. Please check that they are accurate.
You can suppress this message by setting them explicitly:
git config --global user.name Your Name
git config --global user.email you@example.com
If the identity used for this commit is wrong, you can fix it with:
git commit --amend --author='Your Name <you@example.com>'
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
for case (2).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is like --author: allow a user to specify a given date without
using the GIT_AUTHOR_DATE environment variable.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Refuse to use $VISUAL and fall back to $EDITOR if TERM is unset
or set to "dumb". Traditionally, VISUAL is set to a screen
editor and EDITOR to a line-based editor, which should be more
useful in that situation.
vim, for example, is happy to assume a terminal supports ANSI
sequences even if TERM is dumb (e.g., when running from a text
editor like Acme). git already refuses to fall back to vi on a
dumb terminal if GIT_EDITOR, core.editor, VISUAL, and EDITOR are
unset, but without this patch, that check is suppressed by
VISUAL=vi.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
'git commit -s' will insert a blank line before the Signed-off-by
line at the end of the message, unless this last line is a
Signed-off-by line itself. Common use has other trailing lines
at the ends of commit text, in the style of RFC2822 headers.
Be more generous in considering lines to be part of this footer.
If the last paragraph of the commit message reasonably resembles
RFC-2822 formatted lines, don't insert that blank line.
The new Signed-off-by line is still only suppressed when the
author's existing Signed-off-by is the last line of the message.
Signed-off-by: David Brown <davidb@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These scripts all test git programs that are written in
perl, and thus obviously won't work if NO_PERL is defined.
We pass NO_PERL to the scripts from the building Makefile
via the GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS file.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "--signoff" test case in t7500-commit.sh was setting VISUAL while
using -F -, which indeed tested that the editor is not spawned with -F.
However, having it there was confusing, since there was no obvious reason
to the casual reader for it to be there.
This commits removes the setting of VISUAL from the --signoff test, and
adds in t7501-commit.sh a dedicated test case, where the rest of tests for
-F are.
Signed-off-by: Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es>
Okay-then-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This should make the output more readable (by default using diff -u)
when some tests fail.
Also changed the diff order from "current expected" to "expected
current".
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This patch changes every occurrence of "! git" -- with the meaning
that a git call has to gracefully fail -- into "test_must_fail git".
This is useful to
- make sure the test does not fail because of a signal,
e.g. SIGSEGV, and
- advertise the use of "test_must_fail" for new tests.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* bd/tests:
Rename the test trash directory to contain spaces.
Fix tests breaking when checkout path contains shell metacharacters
Don't use the 'export NAME=value' in the test scripts.
lib-git-svn.sh: Fix quoting issues with paths containing shell metacharacters
test-lib.sh: Fix some missing path quoting
Use test_set_editor in t9001-send-email.sh
test-lib.sh: Add a test_set_editor function to safely set $VISUAL
git-send-email.perl: Handle shell metacharacters in $EDITOR properly
config.c: Escape backslashes in section names properly
git-rebase.sh: Fix --merge --abort failures when path contains whitespace
Conflicts:
t/t9115-git-svn-dcommit-funky-renames.sh
On some shells (notably /bin/sh on FreeBSD 6.1), the
construct
foo && ! bar | baz
is true if
foo && baz
whereas for most other shells (such as bash) is true if
foo && ! baz
We can work around this by specifying
foo && ! (bar | baz)
which works everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This fixes the remainder of the issues where the test script itself is at
fault for failing when the git checkout path contains whitespace or other
shell metacharacters.
The majority of git svn tests used the idiom
test_expect_success "title" "test script using $svnrepo"
These were changed to have the test script in single-quotes:
test_expect_success "title" 'test script using "$svnrepo"'
which unfortunately makes the patch appear larger than it really is.
One consequence of this change is that in the verbose test output the
value of $svnrepo (and in some cases other variables, too) is no
longer expanded, i.e. previously we saw
* expecting success:
test script using /path/to/git/t/trash/svnrepo
but now it is:
* expecting success:
test script using "$svnrepo"
Signed-off-by: Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@fushizen.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Many scripts compare actual and expected output using
"diff -u". This is nicer than "cmp" because the output shows
how the two differ. However, not all versions of diff
understand -u, leading to unnecessary test failure.
This adds a test_cmp function to the test scripts and
switches all "diff -u" invocations to use it. The function
uses the contents of "$GIT_TEST_CMP" to compare its
arguments; the default is "diff -u".
On systems with a less-capable diff, you can do:
GIT_TEST_CMP=cmp make test
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The scripted version might not have handled this correctly
either, but the version rewritten in C definitely does not grok
this and complains $tag is not a commit object.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite
of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests
run a series of commands that leads to the single command that
needs to be tested, like this:
test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' '
setup1 &&
setup2 &&
setup3 &&
what is to be tested
'
And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the
point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to
succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are
trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to
check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which
is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands.
This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to
use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is
tested, like this:
test_expect_success 'test title' '
setup1 &&
setup2 &&
setup3 &&
! this command should fail
'
test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that
that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it
currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a
file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can
write a test like this:
test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' '
rm -f bar &&
git foo &&
test -f bar
'
This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead
of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the
outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
After tentatively applying a patch from a contributor, you can get a
replacement patch with corrected code and unusable commit log message.
In such a case, this sequence ought to give you an editor based on the
message in the earlier commit, to let you describe an incremental
improvement:
git reset --hard HEAD^ ;# discard the earlier one
git am <corrected-patch
git commit --amend -c HEAD@{1}
Unfortunately, --amend insisted reusing the message from the commit
being amended, ignoring the -c option. This corrects it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As desired, these pass for git-commit.sh, fail for builtin-commit (prior
to the fixes), and succeeded for builtin-commit (after the fixes).
Signed-off-by: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Junio C Hamano
Jeff King
Adam Dinwoodie
Stephen P. Smith
Tay Ray Chuan
Kacper Kornet
Thomas Rast
Chris Webb
Jonathan Nieder
Conrad Irwin
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Thomas Rast
Miklos Vajna
David Brown
Adeodato Simó
Nanako Shiraishi
Stephan Beyer
Bryan Donlan
Wincent Colaiuta