"git fetch" that fetches a commit using the allow-tip-sha1-in-want
extension could have failed to fetch all the requested refs.
* jk/fetch-pack:
fetch-pack: remove dead assignment to ref->new_sha1
fetch_refs_via_pack: free extra copy of refs
filter_ref: make a copy of extra "sought" entries
filter_ref: avoid overwriting ref->old_sha1 with garbage
If the server supports allow_tip_sha1_in_want, we add any
unmatched raw-sha1 entries in our "sought" list of refs to
the list of refs we will ask the other side for. We do so by
inserting the original "struct ref" directly into our list,
rather than making a copy. This has several problems.
The most minor problem is that one cannot ever free the
resulting list; it contains structs that are copies of the
remote refs (made earlier by fetch_pack) along with sought
refs that are referenced elsewhere.
But more importantly that we set the ref->next pointer to
NULL, chopping off the remainder of any existing list that
the ref was a part of. We get the set of "sought" refs in
an array rather than a linked list, but that array is often
in turn generated from a list. The test modification in
t5516 demonstrates this. Rather than fetching just an exact
sha1, we fetch that sha1 plus another ref:
- we build a linked list of refs to fetch when do_fetch
calls get_ref_map; the exact sha1 is first, followed by
the named ref ("refs/heads/extra" in this case).
- we pass that linked list to transport_fetch_ref, which
squashes it into an array of pointers
- that array goes to fetch_pack, which calls filter_ref.
There we generate the want list from a mix of what the
remote side has advertised, and the "sought" entry for
the exact sha1. We set the sought entry's "next" pointer
to NULL.
- after we return from transport_fetch_refs, we then try
to update the refs by following the linked list. But our
list is now truncated, and we do not update
refs/heads/extra at all.
We can fix this by making a copy of the ref. There's nothing
that fetch_pack does to it that must be reflected in the
original "sought" list (and indeed, if that were the case we
would have a serious bug, because it is only exact-sha1
entries which are treated this way).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A future breakage to "git push" to make it incorrectly pay attention
to pushInsteadOf when it should not will be left uncaught without
this change.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When receive.denyCurrentBranch is set to updateInstead, a push that
tries to update the branch that is currently checked out is accepted
only when the index and the working tree exactly matches the
currently checked out commit, in which case the index and the
working tree are updated to match the pushed commit. Otherwise the
push is refused.
This hook can be used to customize this "push-to-deploy" logic. The
hook receives the commit with which the tip of the current branch is
going to be updated, and can decide what kind of local changes are
acceptable and how to update the index and the working tree to match
the updated tip of the current branch.
For example, the hook can simply run `git read-tree -u -m HEAD "$1"`
in order to emulate 'git fetch' that is run in the reverse direction
with `git push`, as the two-tree form of `read-tree -u -m` is
essentially the same as `git checkout` that switches branches while
keeping the local changes in the working tree that do not interfere
with the difference between the branches.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The previous one tests only the case where a path to be updated by
the push-to-deploy has an incompatible change in the target's
working tree that has already been added to the index, but the
feature itself wants to require the working tree to be a lot cleaner
than what is tested. Add a handful more tests to protect the
feature from future changes that mistakenly (from the viewpoint of
the inventor of the feature) loosens the cleanliness requirement,
namely:
- A change only to the working tree but not to the index is still a
change to be protected;
- An untracked file in the working tree that would be overwritten
by a push-to-deploy needs to be protected;
- A change that happens to make a file identical to what is being
pushed is still a change to be protected (i.e. the feature's
cleanliness requirement is more strict than that of checkout).
Also, test that a stat-only change to the working tree is not a
reason to reject a push-to-deploy.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When synchronizing between working directories, it can be handy to update
the current branch via 'push' rather than 'pull', e.g. when pushing a fix
from inside a VM, or when pushing a fix made on a user's machine (where
the developer is not at liberty to install an ssh daemon let alone know
the user's password).
The common workaround – pushing into a temporary branch and then merging
on the other machine – is no longer necessary with this patch.
The new option is:
'updateInstead':
Update the working tree accordingly, but refuse to do so if there
are any uncommitted changes.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Corner-case bugfixes for "git fetch" around reflog handling.
* jk/fetch-reflog-df-conflict:
ignore stale directories when checking reflog existence
fetch: load all default config at startup
When we start the git-fetch program, we call git_config to
load all config, but our callback only processes the
fetch.prune option; we do not chain to git_default_config at
all.
This means that we may not load some core configuration
which will have an effect. For instance, we do not load
core.logAllRefUpdates, which impacts whether or not we
create reflogs in a bare repository.
Note that I said "may" above. It gets even more exciting. If
we have to transfer actual objects as part of the fetch,
then we call fetch_pack as part of the same process. That
function loads its own config, which does chain to
git_default_config, impacting global variables which are
used by the rest of fetch. But if the fetch is a pure ref
update (e.g., a new ref which is a copy of an old one), we
skip fetch_pack entirely. So we get inconsistent results
depending on whether or not we have actual objects to
transfer or not!
Let's just load the core config at the start of fetch, so we
know we have it (we may also load it again as part of
fetch_pack, but that's OK; it's designed to be idempotent).
Our tests check both cases (with and without a pack). We
also check similar behavior for push for good measure, but
it already works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It's not unreasonable to have a tag that points to a blob
that is not part of the normal history. We do this in
git.git to distribute gpg keys. However, we never explicitly
checked in our test suite that this actually works (i.e.,
that pack-objects actually sends the blob because of the tag
mentioning it).
It does in fact work fine, but a recent patch under
discussion broke this, and the test suite didn't notice.
Let's make the test suite more complete.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git push" did not pay attention to branch.*.pushremote if it is
defined earlier than remote.pushdefault; the order of these two
variables in the configuration file should not matter, but it did by
mistake.
* jk/remote-pushremote-config-reading:
remote: handle pushremote config in any order
The remote we push can be defined either by
remote.pushdefault or by branch.*.pushremote for the current
branch. The order in which they appear in the config file
should not matter to precedence (which should be to prefer
the branch-specific config).
The current code parses the config linearly and uses a
single string to store both values, overwriting any
previous value. Thus, config like:
[branch "master"]
pushremote = foo
[remote]
pushdefault = bar
erroneously ends up pushing to "bar" from the master branch.
We can fix this by storing both values and resolving the
correct value after all config is read.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the user is using the 'upstream' mode, these commands:
$ git push
$ git push origin
would find the 'upstream' branch for the current branch, and then
push the current branch to update it. However, pushing a single
branch explicitly, i.e.
$ git push origin $(git symbolic-ref --short HEAD)
would not go through the same ref mapping process, and ends up
updating the branch at 'origin' of the same name, which may not
necessarily be the upstream of the branch being pushed.
In the spirit similar to the previous one, map a colon-less refspec
using the upstream mapping logic.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since f2690487 (fetch: opportunistically update tracking refs,
2013-05-11), we stopped taking a non-storing refspec given on the
command line of "git fetch" literally, and instead started mapping
it via remote.$name.fetch refspecs. This allows
$ git fetch origin master
from the 'origin' repository, which is configured with
[remote "origin"]
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
to update refs/remotes/origin/master with the result, as if the
command line were
$ git fetch origin +master:refs/remotes/origin/master
to reduce surprises and improve usability. Before that change, a
refspec on the command line without a colon was only to fetch the
history and leave the result in FETCH_HEAD, without updating the
remote-tracking branches.
When you are simulating a fetch from you by your mothership with a
push by you into your mothership, instead of having:
[remote "satellite"]
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/satellite/*
on the mothership repository and running:
mothership$ git fetch satellite
you would have:
[remote "mothership"]
push = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/satellite/*
on your satellite machine, and run:
satellite$ git push mothership
Because we so far did not make the corresponding change to the push
side, this command:
satellite$ git push mothership master
does _not_ allow you on the satellite to only push 'master' out but
still to the usual destination (i.e. refs/remotes/satellite/master).
Implement the logic to map an unqualified refspec given on the
command line via the remote.$name.push refspec. This will bring a
bit more symmetry between "fetch" and "push".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- From the beginning of push.c in 755225d, 2006-04-29, "thin" option
was enabled by default but could be turned off with --no-thin.
- Then Shawn changed the default to 0 in favor of saving server
resources in a4503a1, 2007-09-09. --no-thin worked great.
- One day later, in 9b28851 Daniel extracted some code from push.c to
create transport.c. He (probably accidentally) flipped the default
value from 0 to 1 in transport_get().
From then on --no-thin is effectively no-op because git-push still
expects the default value to be false and only calls
transport_set_option() when "thin" variable in push.c is true (which
is unnecessary). Correct the code to respect --no-thin by calling
transport_set_option() in both cases.
receive-pack learns about --reject-thin-pack-for-testing option,
which only is for testing purposes, hence no document update.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Adjust our tests for upcoming migration of the default value for the
"push.default" configuration variable to "simple" from "mixed".
* 'jc/push-2.0-default-to-simple' (early part):
t5570: do not assume the "matching" push is the default
t5551: do not assume the "matching" push is the default
t5550: do not assume the "matching" push is the default
t9401: do not assume the "matching" push is the default
t9400: do not assume the "matching" push is the default
t7406: do not assume the "matching" push is the default
t5531: do not assume the "matching" push is the default
t5519: do not assume the "matching" push is the default
t5517: do not assume the "matching" push is the default
t5516: do not assume the "matching" push is the default
t5505: do not assume the "matching" push is the default
t5404: do not assume the "matching" push is the default
Support "pull from one place, push to another place" workflow
better by introducing remote.pushdefault (overrides the "origin"
thing) and branch.*.pushremote (overrides the branch.*.remote).
* rr/triangle:
remote.c: introduce branch.<name>.pushremote
remote.c: introduce remote.pushdefault
remote.c: introduce a way to have different remotes for fetch/push
t5516 (fetch-push): drop implicit arguments from helper functions
t5516 (fetch-push): update test description
remote.c: simplify a bit of code using git_config_string()
Update a test to match the documented interaction between pushURL
and pushInsteadOf.
* jc/t5516-pushInsteadOf-vs-pushURL:
t5516: test interaction between pushURL and pushInsteadOf correctly
This new configuration variable overrides `remote.pushdefault` and
`branch.<name>.remote` for pushes. When you pull from one
place (e.g. your upstream) and push to another place (e.g. your own
publishing repository), you would want to set `remote.pushdefault` to
specify the remote to push to for all branches, and use this option to
override it for a specific branch.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This new configuration variable defines the default remote to push to,
and overrides `branch.<name>.remote` for all branches. It is useful
in the typical triangular-workflow setup, where the remote you're
fetching from is different from the remote you're pushing to.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Many of the tests in t5516 look like:
mk_empty &&
git push testrepo ... &&
check_push_result $commit heads/master
It's reasonably easy to see what is being tested, with the
exception that "testrepo" is a magic global name (it is
implicitly used in the helpers, but we have to name it
explicitly when calling git directly). Let's make it
explicit when call the helpers, too. This is slightly more
typing, but makes the test snippets read more naturally.
It also makes it easy for future tests to use an alternate
or multiple repositories, without a proliferation of helper
functions.
[rr: fixed sloppy quoting]
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The file was originally created in bcdb34f (Test wildcard push/fetch,
2007-06-08), and only contained tests that exercised wildcard
functionality at the time. In subsequent commits, many other tests
unrelated to wildcards were added but the test description was never
updated. Fix this.
Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Update t5516 with style fixes.
* jn/push-tests:
push test: rely on &&-chaining instead of 'if bad; then echo Oops; fi'
push test: simplify check of push result
push test: use test_config when appropriate
1c2eafb89b (Add url.<base>.pushInsteadOf: URL rewriting for push
only, 2009-09-07) wants to make sure that a push destination read
from URL is not rewritten by pushInsteadOf because an explicit
pushURL exists; for that, a pushInsteadOf rewrite rule for the value
of remote.r.URL is set to a non-existent is set up.
We would also want to make sure that pushInsteadOf rewrite rule is
not applied to the location read from pushURL.
This way, we will make sure that
- "testrepo/" (pushURL) gets updated;
- the push does not try to update "trash2/" (the result of applying
pushInsteadOf to pushURL);
- the push does not try to update "trash3/" (the result of applying
pushInsteadOf to URL).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Allows requests to fetch objects at any tip of refs (including
hidden ones). It seems that there may be use cases even outside
Gerrit (e.g. $gmane/215701).
* jc/fetch-raw-sha1:
fetch: fetch objects by their exact SHA-1 object names
upload-pack: optionally allow fetching from the tips of hidden refs
fetch: use struct ref to represent refs to be fetched
parse_fetch_refspec(): clarify the codeflow a bit
When it is unclear which command from a test has failed, usual
practice these days is to debug by running the test again with "sh -x"
instead of relying on debugging 'echo' statements.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This test checks each ref with code like the following:
r=$(git show-ref -s --verify refs/$ref) &&
test "z$r" = "z$the_first_commit"
Afterward it counts refs:
test 1 = $(git for-each-ref refs/remotes/origin | wc -l)
Simpler to test the number and values of relevant refs in for-each-ref
output at the same time using test_cmp. This makes the test more
readable and provides more helpful "./t5516-push-push.sh -v" output
when the test fails.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Configuration from test_config does not last beyond the end of the
current test assertion, making each test easier to think about in
isolation.
This changes the meaning of some of the tests. For example, currently
"push with insteadOf" passes even if the line setting
"url.$TRASH.pushInsteadOf" is dropped because an url.$TRASH.insteadOf
setting leaks in from a previous test.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The new option "--follow-tags" tells "git push" to push annotated
tags that are missing from the other side and that can be reached by
the history that is otherwise pushed out.
For example, if you are using the "simple", "current", or "upstream"
push, you would ordinarily push the history leading to the commit at
your current HEAD and nothing else. With this option, you would
also push all annotated tags that can be reached from that commit to
the other side.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Allow the server side to redact the refs/ namespace it shows to the
client.
Will merge to 'master'.
* jc/hidden-refs:
upload/receive-pack: allow hiding ref hierarchies
upload-pack: simplify request validation
upload-pack: share more code
Teach "git fetch" to accept an exact SHA-1 object name the user may
obtain out of band on the LHS of a pathspec, and send it on a "want"
message when the server side advertises the allow-tip-sha1-in-want
capability.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A repository may have refs that are only used for its internal
bookkeeping purposes that should not be exposed to the others that
come over the network.
Teach upload-pack to omit some refs from its initial advertisement
by paying attention to the uploadpack.hiderefs multi-valued
configuration variable. Do the same to receive-pack via the
receive.hiderefs variable. As a convenient short-hand, allow using
transfer.hiderefs to set the value to both of these variables.
Any ref that is under the hierarchies listed on the value of these
variable is excluded from responses to requests made by "ls-remote",
"fetch", etc. (for upload-pack) and "push" (for receive-pack).
Because these hidden refs do not count as OUR_REF, an attempt to
fetch objects at the tip of them will be rejected, and because these
refs do not get advertised, "git push :" will not see local branches
that have the same name as them as "matching" ones to be sent.
An attempt to update/delete these hidden refs with an explicit
refspec, e.g. "git push origin :refs/hidden/22", is rejected. This
is not a new restriction. To the pusher, it would appear that there
is no such ref, so its push request will conclude with "Now that I
sent you all the data, it is time for you to update the refs. I saw
that the ref did not exist when I started pushing, and I want the
result to point at this commit". The receiving end will apply the
compare-and-swap rule to this request and rejects the push with
"Well, your update request conflicts with somebody else; I see there
is such a ref.", which is the right thing to do. Otherwise a push to
a hidden ref will always be "the last one wins", which is not a good
default.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When pushing to update a branch with a commit that is not a
descendant of the commit at the tip, a wrong message "already
exists" was given, instead of the correct "non-fast-forward", if we
do not have the object sitting in the destination repository at the
tip of the ref we are updating.
The primary cause of the bug is that the check in a new helper
function is_forwardable() assumed both old and new objects are
available and can be checked, which is not always the case.
The way the caller uses the result of this function is also wrong.
If the helper says "we do not want to let this push go through", the
caller unconditionally translates it into "we blocked it because the
destination already exists", which is not true at all in this case.
Fix this by doing these three things:
* Remove unnecessary not_forwardable from "struct ref"; it is only
used inside set_ref_status_for_push();
* Make "refs/tags/" the only hierarchy that cannot be replaced
without --force;
* Remove the misguided attempt to force that everything that
updates an existing ref has to be a commit outside "refs/tags/"
hierarchy.
The policy last one tried to implement may later be resurrected and
extended to ensure fast-forwardness (defined as "not losing
objects", extending from the traditional "not losing commits from
the resulting history") when objects that are not commit are
involved (e.g. an annotated tag in hierarchies outside refs/tags),
but such a logic belongs to "is this a fast-forward?" check that is
done by ref_newer(); is_forwardable(), which is now removed, was not
the right place to do so.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Do not allow fast-forwarding of references that point to a tag object.
Updating from a tag is potentially destructive since it would likely
leave the tag dangling. Disallowing updates to a tag also makes sense
semantically and is consistent with the behavior of lightweight tags.
Signed-off-by: Chris Rorvick <chris@rorvick.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
References are allowed to update from one commit-ish to another if the
former is an ancestor of the latter. This behavior is oriented to
branches which are expected to move with commits. Tag references are
expected to be static in a repository, though, thus an update to
something under refs/tags/ should be rejected unless the update is
forced.
Signed-off-by: Chris Rorvick <chris@rorvick.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When pushing groups of refs to a remote, there is no simple way to remove
old refs that still exist at the remote that is no longer updated from us.
This will allow us to remove such refs from the remote.
With this change, running this command
$ git push --prune remote refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/laptop/*
removes refs/remotes/laptop/foo from the remote if we do not have branch
"foo" locally anymore.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a push specifies deletion of non-existent refs, the post post-receive and
post-update hooks receive them as input/arguments.
For instance, for the following push, where refs/heads/nonexistent is a ref
which does not exist on the remote side:
git push origin :refs/heads/nonexistent
the post-receive hook receives from standard input:
<null-sha1> SP <null-sha1> SP refs/heads/nonexistent
and the post-update hook receives as arguments:
refs/heads/nonexistent
which does not make sense since it is a no-op.
Teach receive-pack not to pass non-existent refs to the post-receive and
post-update hooks. If the push only attempts to delete non-existent refs,
these hooks are not even called.
The update and pre-receive hooks are still notified about attempted
deletion of non-existent refs to give them a chance to inspect the
situation and act on it.
[jc: mild fix-ups to avoid introducing an extra list; also added fixes to
some tests]
Signed-off-by: Pang Yan Han <pangyanhan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
refs.c had a error message "Trying to write ref with nonexistant object".
And no tests relied on the wrong spelling.
Also typo was present in some test scripts internals, these tests still pass.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Ivankov <divanorama@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Breaks in a test assertion's && chain can potentially hide
failures from earlier commands in the chain.
Commands intended to fail should be marked with !, test_must_fail, or
test_might_fail. The examples in this patch do not require that.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* js/maint-receive-pack-symref-alias:
t5516-fetch-push.sh: style cleanup
receive-pack: detect aliased updates which can occur with symrefs
receive-pack: switch global variable 'commands' to a parameter
Conflicts:
t/t5516-fetch-push.sh
Fix the problem where the cmd->err passed into start_command wasn't
being properly closed when certain types of errors occurr. (Compare
the affected code with the clean shutdown code later in the function.)
On Windows, this problem would be triggered if mingw_spawnvpe()
failed, which would happen if the command to be executed was malformed
(e.g. a text file that didn't start with a #! line). If cmd->err was
a pipe, the failure to close it could result in a hang while the other
side was waiting (forever) for either input or pipe close, e.g. while
trying to shove the output into the side band. On msysGit, this
problem was causing a hang in t5516-fetch-push.
[J6t: With a slight adjustment of the test case, the hang is also
observed on Linux.]
Signed-off-by: bert Dvornik <dvornik+git@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cleanup t5516-fetch-push.sh to use prevailing test script style
Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When pushing to a remote repo the sending side filters out aliased
updates (e.g., foo:baz bar:baz). However, it is not possible for the
sender to know if two refs are aliased on the receiving side via
symrefs. Here is one such scenario:
$ git init origin
$ (cd origin && touch file && git add file && git commit -a -m intial)
$ git clone --bare origin origin.git
$ rm -rf origin
$ git clone origin.git client
$ git clone --mirror client backup.git &&
$ (cd backup.git && git remote set-head origin --auto)
$ (cd client &&
git remote add --mirror backup ../backup.git &&
echo change1 > file && git commit -a -m change1 &&
git push origin &&
git push backup
)
The push to backup fails with:
Counting objects: 5, done.
Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 244 bytes, done.
Total 3 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
Unpacking objects: 100% (3/3), done.
error: Ref refs/remotes/origin/master is at ef3... but expected 262...
remote: error: failed to lock refs/remotes/origin/master
To ../backup.git
262cd57..ef307ff master -> master
262cd57..ef307ff origin/HEAD -> origin/HEAD
! [remote rejected] origin/master -> origin/master (failed to lock)
error: failed to push some refs to '../backup.git'
The reason is that refs/remotes/origin/HEAD is a symref to
refs/remotes/origin/master, but it is not possible for the sending side
to unambiguously know this.
This commit fixes the issue by having receive-pack ignore any update to
a symref whose target is being identically updated. If a symref and its
target are being updated inconsistently, then the update for both fails
with an error message ("refusing inconsistent update...") to help
diagnose the situation.
Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Consistently using test_cmp would make debugging test scripts far easier,
as output from them run under "-v" option becomes readable.
Besides, some platforms' "diff" implementations lack "-q" option.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Verify that the output format is correct for successful, rejected, and
flagrantly erroneous pushes.
Signed-off-by: Larry D'Anna <larry@elder-gods.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Refspecs without a source side have been reported as confusing by many.
As an alternative, this adds support for commands like:
git push origin --delete somebranch
git push origin --delete tag sometag
Specifically, --delete will prepend a colon to all colon-less refspecs
given on the command line, and will refuse to accept refspecs with
colons to prevent undue confusion.
Signed-off-by: Jan Krüger <jk@jk.gs>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Junio C Hamano
Jeff King
Anders Kaseorg
Johannes Schindelin
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
Ramkumar Ramachandra
Jonathan Nieder
Chris Rorvick
Felipe Contreras
Pang Yan Han
Dmitry Ivankov
bert Dvornik
Jay Soffian
Larry D'Anna
Jan Krüger