Граф коммитов

4 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Timo Sirainen 4ec99bf080 [PATCH] -Werror fixes
GCC's format __attribute__ is good for checking errors, especially
with -Wformat=2 parameter. This fixes most of the reported problems
against 2005-08-09 snapshot.
2005-08-09 22:28:19 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 1038f0c0a1 [PATCH] Typofix an error message in pack-check.c
The current error message does not make any sense.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-07 15:54:57 -07:00
Junio C Hamano ad8c80a58f [PATCH] Show more details of packfile with verify-pack -v.
This implements show_pack_info() function used in verify-pack
command when -v flag is used to obtain something like
unpack-objects used to give when it was first written.

It shows the following for each non-deltified object found in
the pack:

    SHA1 type size offset

For deltified objects, it shows this instead:

    SHA1 type size offset depth base_sha1

In order to get the output in the order that appear in the pack
file for debugging purposes, you can do this:

 $ git-verify-pack -v packfile | sort -n -k 4,4

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-30 22:33:47 -07:00
Junio C Hamano f3bf922409 [PATCH] verify-pack updates.
Nico pointed out that having verify_pack.c and verify-pack.c was
confusing.  Rename verify_pack.c to pack-check.c as suggested,
and enhances the verification done quite a bit.

 - Built-in sha1_file unpacking knows that a base object of a
   deltified object _must_ be in the same pack, and takes
   advantage of that fact.

 - Earlier verify-pack command only checked the SHA1 sum for the
   entire pack file and did not look into its contents.  It now
   checks everything idx file claims to have unpacks correctly.

 - It now has a hook to give more detailed information for
   objects contained in the pack under -v flag.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-30 22:33:47 -07:00