Граф коммитов

4 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Junio C Hamano 8fe9c3f21d Merge branch 'en/rebase-merge-on-sequencer'
"git rebase --merge" as been reimplemented by reusing the internal
machinery used for "git rebase -i".

* en/rebase-merge-on-sequencer:
  rebase: implement --merge via the interactive machinery
  rebase: define linearization ordering and enforce it
  git-legacy-rebase: simplify unnecessary triply-nested if
  git-rebase, sequencer: extend --quiet option for the interactive machinery
  am, rebase--merge: do not overlook --skip'ed commits with post-rewrite
  t5407: add a test demonstrating how interactive handles --skip differently
  rebase: fix incompatible options error message
  rebase: make builtin and legacy script error messages the same
2019-02-06 22:05:20 -08:00
Elijah Newren 899b49c446 git-rebase, sequencer: extend --quiet option for the interactive machinery
While 'quiet' and 'interactive' may sound like antonyms, the interactive
machinery actually has logic that implements several
interactive_rebase=implied cases (--exec, --keep-empty, --rebase-merges)
which won't pop up an editor.  The rewrite of interactive rebase in C
added a quiet option, though it only turns stats off.  Since we want to
make the interactive machinery also take over for git-rebase--merge, it
should fully implement the --quiet option.

git-rebase--interactive was already somewhat quieter than
git-rebase--merge and git-rebase--am, possibly because cherry-pick has
just traditionally been quieter.  As such, we only drop a few
informational messages -- "Rebasing (n/m)" and "Successfully rebased..."

Also, for simplicity, remove the differences in how quiet and verbose
options were recorded.  Having one be signalled by the presence of a
"verbose" file in the state_dir, while the other was signalled by the
contents of a "quiet" file was just weirdly inconsistent.  (This
inconsistency pre-dated the rewrite into C.)  Make them consistent by
having them both key off the presence of the file.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-12-28 12:49:48 -08:00
Johannes Schindelin d421afa0c6 rebase: introduce --reschedule-failed-exec
A common use case for the `--exec` option is to verify that each commit
in a topic branch compiles cleanly, via `git rebase -x make <base>`.

However, when an `exec` in such a rebase fails, it is not re-scheduled,
which in this instance is not particularly helpful.

Let's offer a flag to reschedule failed `exec` commands.

Based on an idea by Paul Morelle.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-12-11 17:19:01 +09:00
Pratik Karki c7b64aa0f3 rebase: refactor common shell functions into their own file
The functions present in `git-legacy-rebase.sh` are used by the rebase
backends as they are implemented as shell script functions in the
`git-rebase--<backend>` files.

To make the `builtin/rebase.c` work, we have to provide support via
a Unix shell script snippet that uses these functions and so, we
want to use the rebase backends *directly* from the builtin rebase
without going through `git-legacy-rebase.sh`.

This commit extracts the functions to a separate file,
`git-rebase--common`, that will be read by `git-legacy-rebase.sh` and
by the shell script snippets which will be used extensively in the
following commits.

Signed-off-by: Pratik Karki <predatoramigo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-08-06 13:08:01 -07:00