The tests added in 96e7225b31 (hook: add 'run' subcommand,
2021-12-22) were redirecting to "actual" both in the body of the hook
itself and in the testing code below.
The net result was that the "2>>actual" redirection later in the test
wasn't doing anything. Let's have those redirection do what it looks
like they're doing.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
On Cygwin, when failing to spawn a process using start_command, Git
outputs the same error as on Linux systems, rather than using the
GIT_WINDOWS_NATIVE-specific error output. The WINDOWS test prerequisite
is set in both Cygwin and native Windows environments, which means it's
not appropriate to use to anticipate the error output from
start_command. Instead, use the MINGW test prerequisite, which is only
set for Git in native Windows environments, and not for Cygwin.
Signed-off-by: Adam Dinwoodie <adam@dinwoodie.org>
Helped-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a logic error in a082345372 (hook API: fix v2.36.0 regression:
hooks should be connected to a TTY, 2022-06-07). When it started using
the "ungroup" API added in fd3aaf53f7 (run-command: add an "ungroup"
option to run_process_parallel(), 2022-06-07) it should have made the
same sort of change that fd3aaf53f7 itself made in
"t/helper/test-run-command.c".
The correct way to emit this "Couldn't start" output with "ungroup"
would be:
fprintf(stderr, _("Couldn't start hook '%s'\n"), hook_path);
But we should instead remove the emitting of this output. As the added
test shows we already emit output when we can't run the child. The
"cannot run" output here is emitted by run-command.c's
child_err_spew().
So the addition of the "Couldn't start hook" output here in
96e7225b31 (hook: add 'run' subcommand, 2021-12-22) was always
redundant. For the pre-commit hook we'll now emit exactly the same
output as we did before f443246b9f (commit: convert
{pre-commit,prepare-commit-msg} hook to hook.h, 2021-12-22) (and
likewise for others).
We could at this point add this to the pick_next_hook() callbacks in
hook.c:
assert(!out);
assert(!*pp_task_cb);
And this to notify_start_failure() and notify_hook_finished() (in the
latter case the parameter is called "pp_task_cp"):
assert(!out);
assert(!pp_task_cb);
But let's leave any such instrumentation for some eventual cleanup of
the "ungroup" API.
Reported-by: Ilya K <me@0upti.me>
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a regression reported[1] against f443246b9f (commit: convert
{pre-commit,prepare-commit-msg} hook to hook.h, 2021-12-22): Due to
using the run_process_parallel() API in the earlier 96e7225b31 (hook:
add 'run' subcommand, 2021-12-22) we'd capture the hook's stderr and
stdout, and thus lose the connection to the TTY in the case of
e.g. the "pre-commit" hook.
As a preceding commit notes GNU parallel's similar --ungroup option
also has it emit output faster. While we're unlikely to have hooks
that emit truly massive amounts of output (or where the performance
thereof matters) it's still informative to measure the overhead. In a
similar "seq" test we're now ~30% faster:
$ cat .git/hooks/seq-hook; git hyperfine -L rev origin/master,HEAD~0 -s 'make CFLAGS=-O3' './git hook run seq-hook'
#!/bin/sh
seq 100000000
Benchmark 1: ./git hook run seq-hook' in 'origin/master
Time (mean ± σ): 787.1 ms ± 13.6 ms [User: 701.6 ms, System: 534.4 ms]
Range (min … max): 773.2 ms … 806.3 ms 10 runs
Benchmark 2: ./git hook run seq-hook' in 'HEAD~0
Time (mean ± σ): 603.4 ms ± 1.6 ms [User: 573.1 ms, System: 30.3 ms]
Range (min … max): 601.0 ms … 606.2 ms 10 runs
Summary
'./git hook run seq-hook' in 'HEAD~0' ran
1.30 ± 0.02 times faster than './git hook run seq-hook' in 'origin/master'
1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/CA+dzEBn108QoMA28f0nC8K21XT+Afua0V2Qv8XkR8rAeqUCCZw@mail.gmail.com/
Reported-by: Anthony Sottile <asottile@umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
[jc: minor fix-up to tests for consistency]
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Amend a test added in 96e7225b31 (hook: add 'run' subcommand,
2021-12-22) to use a for-loop instead of a copy/pasting the same test
for the four exit codes we test.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a "test_hook" wrapper similar to the existing "test_config"
wrapper added in d960c47a88 (test-lib: add helper functions for
config, 2011-08-17).
This wrapper:
- Will clean up the hook with "test_when_finished", unless --setup is
provided.
- Will error if we clobber a hook, unless --clobber is provided.
- Takes a name like "update" instead of ".git/hooks/update".
- Accepts -C <dir>, like "test_config" and "test_commit".
By using a wrapper we'll be able to easily change all the hook-related
code that assumes that the template-created ".git/hooks" directory is
created by "init", "clone" etc. once another topic follows-up and
changes the test suite to stop creating trash directories using those
templates.
In addition this will make it easy to have the hooks configured using
the "configuration-based hooks" topic, once we get around to
integrating that. I.e. we'll be able to run the tests in a mode where
we sometimes create a .git/hooks/<name>, and other times create a
script in another location, and point the relevant configuration
snippet to it.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
For certain one-shot hooks we'd like to optimistically run them, and
not complain if they don't exist.
This was already supported by the underlying hook.c library, but had
not been exposed via "git hook run". The command version of this will
be used by send-email in a subsequent commit.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In order to enable hooks to be run as an external process, by a
standalone Git command, or by tools which wrap Git, provide an external
means to run all configured hook commands for a given hook event.
Most of our hooks require more complex functionality than this, but
let's start with the bare minimum required to support our simplest
hooks.
In terms of implementation the usage_with_options() and "goto usage"
pattern here mirrors that of
builtin/{commit-graph,multi-pack-index}.c.
Some of the implementation here, such as a function being named
run_hooks_opt() when it's tasked with running one hook, to using the
run_processes_parallel_tr2() API to run with jobs=1 is somewhere
between a bit odd and and an overkill for the current features of this
"hook run" command and the hook.[ch] API.
This code will eventually be able to run multiple hooks declared in
config in parallel, by starting out with these names and APIs we
reduce the later churn of renaming functions, switching from the
run_command() to run_processes_parallel_tr2() API etc.
Signed-off-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Adam Dinwoodie
Emily Shaffer