Граф коммитов

25 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Martin Ågren 3c29e21eb0 t: drop debug `cat` calls
We `cat` files, but don't inspect or grab the contents in any way.
Unlike in an earlier commit, there is no reason to suspect that these
files could be missing, so `cat`-ing them is just wasted effort.

Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-24 11:18:25 -08:00
Ruud van Asseldonk 13ca8fb79e t5150: skip request-pull test if Perl is disabled
The git-request-pull.sh script invokes Perl, so it requires Perl to be
available, but the associated test t5150 does not skip itself when Perl
has been disabled, which then makes subtest 4 through 10 fail. Subtest 3
still passes, but for the wrong reasons (it expects git-request-pull to
fail, and it does fail when Perl is not available). The initial two
subtests that do pass are only doing setup.

To prevent t5150 from failing the build when NO_PERL=1, add a check that
sets skip_all when "! test_have_prereq PERL", just like how for example
t3701-add-interactive skips itself when Perl has been disabled.

Signed-off-by: Ruud van Asseldonk <dev@veniogames.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-11-27 10:59:15 +09:00
Paolo Bonzini 0454220d66 request-pull: warn if the remote object is not the same as the local one
In some cases, git request-pull might be invoked with remote and
local objects that differ even though they point to the same commit.
For example, the remote object might be a lightweight tag
vs. an annotated tag on the local side; or the user might have
reworded the tag locally and forgotten to push it.

When this happens git-request-pull will not warn, because it only
checks that "git ls-remote" returns an SHA1 that matches the local
commit (known as $headrev in the script).  This patch makes
git-request-pull retrieve the tag object SHA1 while processing
the "git ls-remote" output, so that it can be matched against the
local object.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-05-28 13:06:25 -07:00
Paolo Bonzini 5731dfce06 request-pull: quote regex metacharacters in local ref
The local part of the third argument of git-request-pull is used in
a regular expression without quoting it.  Use qr{} and \Q\E to ensure
that e.g. a period in a tag name does not match any character on the
remote side.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-05-28 13:06:21 -07:00
brian m. carlson 2ece6ad281 t: switch $_x40 to $OID_REGEX
Switch all uses of $_x40 to $OID_REGEX so that they work correctly with
larger hashes.  This commit was created by using the following sed
command to modify all files in the t directory except t/test-lib.sh:

  sed -i 's/\$_x40/$OID_REGEX/g'

Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-05-14 11:02:01 +09:00
Ann T Ropea e66d7c37a5 request-pull: capitalise "Git" to make it a proper noun
Of the many ways to spell the three-letter word, the variant "Git"
should be used when referring to a repository in a description; or, in
general, when it is used as a proper noun.

We thus change the pull-request template message so that it reads

   "...in the Git repository at:"

Besides, this brings us in line with the documentation, see
Documentation/howto/using-signed-tag-in-pull-request.txt

Signed-off-by: Ann T Ropea <bedhanger@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-10-03 13:11:57 +09:00
Johannes Sixt 644edd02c1 fix brown paper bag breakage in t5150-request-pull.sh
The recent addition to the test case 'pull request format' interrupted
the single-quoted text, effectively adding a third argument to the
test_expect_success command. Since we do not have a prerequisite named
"pull request format", the test is skipped, no matter what. Additionally,
the file name argument to the grep command is missing. Fix both issues.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-02 11:05:33 -07:00
Junio C Hamano d952cbb190 request-pull: resurrect for-linus -> tags/for-linus DWIM
Older versions of Git before v1.7.10 did not DWIM

    $ git pull $URL for-linus

to the tag "tags/for-linus" and the users were required to say

    $ git pull $URL tags/for-linus

instead.  Because newer versions of Git works either way,
request-pull used to show tags/for-linus when asked

    $ git request-pull origin/master $URL for-linus

The recent updates broke this and in the output we see "for-linus"
without the "tags/" prefix.

As v1.7.10 is more than 2 years old, this should matter very little
in practice, but resurrecting it is very simple.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-05-16 10:18:25 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 5aae66bd99 request-pull: resurrect "pretty refname" feature
When asking to fetch/pull a branch whose name is B or a tag whose
name is T, we used to show the command to run as:

	git pull $URL B
        git pull $URL tags/T

even when B and T were spelled in a more qualified way in order to
disambiguate, e.g. heads/B or refs/tags/T, but the recent update
lost this feature.  Resurrect it.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-02-25 13:45:38 -08:00
Junio C Hamano 28ad685f70 request-pull: test updates
This illustrates behaviour changes that result from the recent
change by Linus.  Most show good changes, but there may be some
usability regressions:

 - The command continues to fail when the user forgot to push out
   before running the command, but the wording of the message has
   been slightly changed.

 - The command no longer guesses when asked to request the commit at
   the HEAD be pulled after pushing it to a branch 'for-upstream',
   even when that branch points at the correct commit.  The user
   must ask the command with the new "master:for-upstream" syntax.

The new behaviour needs to be documented in any case, but we need to
agree what the new behaviour should be before doing so first.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-02-25 12:54:45 -08:00
Dennis Kaarsemaker d77fd050ab tests: allow sha1's as part of the path
When running 'make test' from a path such as
.../daily-build/master@bdff0e3a374617dce784f801b97500d9ba2e4705, the
logic in fuzz.sed as generated by t5105-request-pull.sh was backwards,
replacing object names before replacing urls, making the test fail.

Signed-off-by: Dennis Kaarsemaker <dennis@kaarsemaker.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-17 12:59:50 -07:00
Jonathan Nieder fc5877a623 test: use test_i18ncmp when checking --stat output
Ever since v1.7.9.2~13 (2012-02-01), git's diffstat-style summary line
produced by "git apply --stat", "git diff --stat", and "git commit"
varies by locale, producing test failures when GETTEXT_POISON is set.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-03-13 14:26:27 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 2ef80c2d89 Merge branch 'nd/diffstat-gramnum'
* nd/diffstat-gramnum:
  Use correct grammar in diffstat summary line
2012-02-12 22:43:19 -08:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 7f814632f5 Use correct grammar in diffstat summary line
"git diff --stat" and "git apply --stat" now learn to print the line
"%d files changed, %d insertions(+), %d deletions(-)" in singular form
whenever applicable. "0 insertions" and "0 deletions" are also omitted
unless they are both zero.

This matches how versions of "diffstat" that are not prehistoric produced
their output, and also makes this line translatable.

[jc: with help from Thomas Dickey in archaeology of "diffstat"]
[jc: squashed Jonathan's updates to illustrations in tutorials and a test]

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-03 23:19:42 -08:00
Junio C Hamano 2ad9ba0382 request-pull: explicitly ask tags/$name to be pulled
When asking for a tag to be pulled, disambiguate by leaving tags/ prefix
in front of the name of the tag. E.g.

    ... in the git repository at:

      git://example.com/git/git.git/ tags/v1.2.3

    for you to fetch changes up to 123456...

This way, older versions of "git pull" can be used to respond to such a
request more easily, as "git pull $URL v1.2.3" did not DWIM to fetch
v1.2.3 tag in older versions. Also this makes it clearer for humans that
the pull request is made for a tag and he should anticipate a signed one.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-01-31 21:27:58 -08:00
Junio C Hamano f032d66ddb request-pull: do not emit "tag" before the tagname
The whole point of the recent update to allow "git pull $url $tagname" is
so that the integrator does not have to store the (signed) tag that is
used to convey authenticity to be recorded in the resulting merge in the
local repository's tag namespace.  Asking for a merge be made with "git
pull $url tag $tagname" defeats it.

Note that the request can become ambiguous if the requestor has a branch
with the same name as the tag, but that is not a new problem limited to
pulling. I wouldn't mind if somebody wants to add disambiguation to the
find_matching_ref logic in the script as a separate patch, though.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-19 11:59:57 -08:00
Junio C Hamano fe46fa9d26 request-pull: update the "pull" command generation logic
The old code that insisted on asking for the tip of a branch to be pulled
were not updated when we started allowing for a tag to be pulled. When a
tag points at an older part of the history and there is no branch that
points at the tagged commit, the script failed to say which ref is to be
pulled.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-16 09:25:20 -08:00
Junio C Hamano d050464541 request-pull: use the annotated tag contents
The integrator tool will start allowing to pull a signed or an annotated
tag, i.e.

    $ git pull $there tags/for-linus

and the description in the tag is used to convey a meaningful message from
the lieutenant to the integrator to justify the history being pulled.

Include the message in the pull request e-mail, as the same information is
useful in this context, too. It would encourage the lieutenants to write
meaningful messages in their signed tags.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-11-09 05:31:09 -08:00
Junio C Hamano cf7316663e request-pull: state what commit to expect
The message gives a detailed explanation of the commit the requester based
the changes on, but lacks information that is necessary for the person who
performs a fetch & merge in order to verify that the correct branch was
fetched when responding to the pull request.

Add a few more lines to describe the commit at the tip expected to be
fetched to the same level of detail as the base commit.

Also update the warning message slightly when the script notices that the
commit may not have been pushed.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-10-05 14:51:26 -07:00
Brandon Casey 6f89384fe0 t/t5150: remove space from sed script
Solaris's xpg4/sed and IRIX's sed fail to parse these negated matching
expressions when the '!' is separated from the command that follows.

Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-02 09:30:35 -07:00
Jeff King bf4d382615 tests: chmod +x t5150
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-05-10 11:52:16 -07:00
Jonathan Nieder f2cabf6abf adapt request-pull tests for new pull request format
10eb0007 (request-pull: avoid mentioning that the start point is a
single commit, 2010-01-29), changed the pull request format, so the
test needs some changes to still pass:

 - tolerate a missing blank line between “in the git repository at:”
   and the name of repository and branch

 - recognize subject and date in the new request format

 - update the expected request template to match the new format

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-05-07 21:33:19 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 5bab69172f t5150: protect backslash with backslash in shell
At least /bin/sh on FreeBSD 8 interprets backslash followed by newline in an
unquoted here text as "empty".

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-05-07 21:30:29 -07:00
Jonathan Nieder 50ab6558bf request-pull: protect against OPTIONS_KEEPDASHDASH from environment
Like most git commands, request-pull supports a -- delimiter to allow
callers to pass arguments that would otherwise be treated as an option
afterwards.  The internal OPTIONS_KEEPDASHDASH variable is passed
empty to git-sh-setup to indicate that request-pull itself does not
care about the position of the -- delimiter.  But if the user has
that variable in her environment, request-pull will see the “--” and
fail.

Empty it explicitly to guard against this.  While at it, make the
corresponding fix to git-resurrect, too (all other scripts in git.git
already protect themselves).

Acked-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Acked-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-05-01 11:02:21 -07:00
Jonathan Nieder 30c56eaa2e tests for request-pull
Test that request-pull handles failure to push cleanly, writes
pull requests that produce the correct effect when followed, and
uses a predictable format.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-05-01 11:01:27 -07:00