Граф коммитов

11 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Ramsay Allan Jones 15e593e4d3 Fixup command names in some usage strings.
Most usage strings, such as for command xxx, start with "git-xxx".
This updates the rebels to conform to the general pattern.
(The git wrapper is an exception to this, of course ...)

Signed-off-by: Ramsay Allan Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-08-03 21:38:24 -07:00
Jeff King 8f615493e6 git-push: allow -f as an alias for --force
This was already documented in the options section of the manpage. This
patch implements it, adds it to the usage message, and mentions it at the
top of the manpage.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-08-02 11:30:42 -07:00
Linus Torvalds a633fca0c0 Call setup_git_directory() much earlier
This changes the calling convention of built-in commands and
passes the "prefix" (i.e. pathname of $PWD relative to the
project root level) down to them.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-29 01:34:07 -07:00
Pavel Roskin a9486b02ec Avoid C99 comments, use old-style C comments instead.
This doesn't make the code uglier or harder to read, yet it makes the
code more portable.  This also simplifies checking for other potential
incompatibilities.  "gcc -std=c89 -pedantic" can flag many incompatible
constructs as warnings, but C99 comments will cause it to emit an error.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-10 00:47:13 -07:00
Pavel Roskin 82e5a82fd7 Fix more typos, primarily in the code
The only visible change is that git-blame doesn't understand
"--compability" anymore, but it does accept "--compatibility" instead,
which is already documented.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-10 00:36:44 -07:00
Nick Hengeveld 441c823e89 builtin-push: don't pass --thin to HTTP transport
git-http-push does not currently use packs to transfer objects.

Signed-off-by: Nick Hengeveld <nickh@reactrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-06-05 17:39:44 -07:00
Johannes Schindelin 5edbcd8d77 builtin-push: --all and --tags _are_ explicit refspecs
... so do not get refspecs from remotes/* or the config if one of them
was specified.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-04 17:28:14 -07:00
Johannes Schindelin 97d4df0b29 builtin-push: also ask config for remote information
Now you can store your remote information in the config file like this:

[remote.upstream]
	url = me@company.com:the-project
	push = master:iceballs

[jc: fixed up to adjust a different fix for Push: lines earlier.]

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-02 01:03:02 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 7aaf83dafb Fix builtin-push to honor Push: lines in remotes file.
[jc: originally from Johannes Schindelin, but reworked to lift a
 hard limit of Push: lines]

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-04-30 16:03:27 -07:00
Johannes Schindelin 5c477b9725 builtin-push: resurrect parsing of Push: lines
The C'ification of push left these behind.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-04-30 15:42:09 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 755225de6c git builtin "push"
This adds a builtin "push" command, which is largely just a C'ification of
the "git-push.sh" script.

Now, the reason I did it as a built-in is partly because it's yet another
step on relying less on shell, but it's actually mostly because I've
wanted to be able to push to _multiple_ repositories, and the most obvious
and simplest interface for that would seem be to just have a "remotes"
file that has multiple URL entries.

(For "pull", having multiple entries should either just select the first
one, or you could fall back on the others on failure - your choice).

And quite frankly, it just became too damn messy to do that in shell.
Besides, we actually have a fair amount of infrastructure in C, so it just
wasn't that hard to do.

Of course, this is almost totally untested. It probably doesn't work for
anything but the one trial I threw at it. "Simple" doesn't necessarily
mean "obviously correct".

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-04-30 00:59:18 -07:00