Fix a memory leak in code added in 5d7eeee2ac (git-show: grok blobs,
trees and tags, too, 2006-12-14). As we iterate over a "<revision>..."
command-line and encounter ad OBJ_COMMIT we want to use our "struct
rev_info", but with a "pending" array of one element: the one commit
we're showing in the loop.
To do this 5d7eeee2ac saved away a pointer to rev.pending.objects and
rev.pending.nr for its iteration. We'd then clobber those (and alloc)
when we needed to show an OBJ_COMMIT.
We'd therefore leak the "rev.pending" we started out with, and only
free the new "rev.pending" in the "OBJ_COMMIT" case arm as
prepare_revision_walk() would draw it down.
Let's fix this memory leak. Now when we encounter an OBJ_COMMIT we
save away the "rev.pending" before clearing it. We then add a single
commit to it, which our indirect invocation of prepare_revision_walk()
will remove. After that we restore the "rev.pending".
Our "rev.pending" will then get free'd by the release_revisions()
added in f6bfea0ad0 (revisions API users: use release_revisions() in
builtin/log.c, 2022-04-13)
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add missing tests for showing a tree with "git show". Let's test for
showing a tree, two trees, and that doing so doesn't recurse.
The only tests for this code added in 5d7eeee2ac (git-show: grok
blobs, trees and tags, too, 2006-12-14) were the tests in
t7701-repack-unpack-unreachable.sh added in ccc1297226 (repack:
modify behavior of -A option to leave unreferenced objects unpacked,
2008-05-09).
Let's add this common mode of operation to the "show" tests
themselves. It's more obvious, and the tests in
t7701-repack-unpack-unreachable.sh happily pass if we start buggily
emitting trees recursively.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Because "--graph" is about connected history while --no-walk is
about discrete points, it does not make sense to allow these two
options at the same time. [1]
This change makes a few calls to "show --graph" fail in t4052, but
asking to show one commit with graph is a nonsensical thing to do.
Thus, tests on "show --graph" in t4052 have been removed [2,3].
Same tests on "show" without --graph option have already been tested
in 4052.
3 testcases have been added to test this patch.
[1]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/216083
[2]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/264950
[3]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/265107
Helped-By: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Helped-By: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Helped-By: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongcan Jiang <dongcan.jiang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When git show -s is called for merge commit it prints extra newline
after any merge commit. This differs from output for commits with one
parent. Fix it by more thorough checking that diff output is disabled.
The code in question exists since commit 3969cf7db1. The additional
newline is really needed for cases when patch is requested, test
t4013-diff-various.sh contains cases which can demonstrate behavior when
the condition is restricted further.
Tests:
Added merge commit to 'set up a bit of history' case in t7007-show.sh to
cover the fix.
Existing tests are updated to demonstrate the new behaviour. Earlier,
the tests that used "git show -s --pretty=format:%s", even though
"--pretty=format:%s" calls for item separator semantics and does not ask
for the terminating newline after the last item, expected the output to
end with such a newline. They were relying on the buggy behaviour. Use
of "--format=%s", which is equivalent to "--pretty=tformat:%s" that asks
for a terminating newline after each item, is a more realistic way to
use the command.
In the test 'merge log messages' the expected data is changed, because
it was explicitly listing the extra newline. Also the msg.nologff and
msg.nolognoff expected files are replaced by one msg.nolog, because they
were diffing because of the bug, and now there should be no difference.
Signed-off-by: Max Kirillov <max@max630.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Originally the "--quiet" option was parsed by the
diff-option parser into the internal QUICK option. This had
the effect of silencing diff output from the log (which was
not intended, but happened to work and people started to
use it). But it also had other odd side effects at the diff
level (for example, it would suppress the second commit in
"git show A B").
To fix this, commit 1c40c36 converted log to parse-options
and handled the "quiet" option separately, not passing it
on to the diff code. However, it simply ignored the option,
which was a regression for people using it as a synonym for
"-s". Commit 01771a8 then fixed that by interpreting the
option to add DIFF_FORMAT_NO_OUTPUT to the list of output
formats.
However, that commit did not fix it in all cases. It sets
the flag after setup_revisions is called. Naively, this
makes sense because you would expect the setup_revisions
parser to overwrite our output format flag if "-p" or
another output format flag is seen.
However, that is not how the NO_OUTPUT flag works. We
actually store it in the bit-field as just another format.
At the end of setup_revisions, we call diff_setup_done,
which post-processes the bitfield and clears any other
formats if we have set NO_OUTPUT. By setting the flag after
setup_revisions is done, diff_setup_done does not have a
chance to make this tweak, and we end up with other format
options still set.
As a result, the flag would have no effect in "git log -p
--quiet" or "git show --quiet". Fix it by setting the
format flag before the call to setup_revisions.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The logic of git-show has remained largely unchanged since around
5d7eeee (git-show: grok blobs, trees and tags, too, 2006-12-14): start
a revision walker with no_walk=1, look at its pending objects and
handle them one-by-one. For commits, this means stuffing them into a
new queue all alone, and running the walker.
Then Linus's f222abd (Make 'git show' more useful, 2009-07-13) came
along and set no_walk=0 whenever the user specifies a range. Which
appears to work fine, until you actually prod it hard enough, as the
preceding commit shows: UNINTERESTING commits will be marked as such,
but not walked further to propagate the marks.
Demonstrate this with the main tests of this patch: 'showing a range
walks (Y shape)'. The Y shape of history ensures that propagating the
UNINTERESTING marks is necessary to correctly exclude the main1
commit. The only example I could find actually requires that the
negative revisions are listed later, and in this scenario a dotted
range actually works. However, it is easy to find examples in git.git
where a dotted range is wrong, e.g.
$ git show v1.7.0..v1.7.1 | grep ^commit | wc -l
1297
$ git rev-list v1.7.0..v1.7.1 | wc -l
702
While there, also test a few other things that are not covered so far:
the -N way of triggering a range (added in 5853cae, DWIM 'git show -5'
to 'git show --do-walk -5', 2010-06-01), and the interactions of tags,
commits and ranges.
Pointed out by Dr_Memory on #git.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a tag points at a bad or nonexistent object, we should diagnose the
breakage and exit. An earlier commit 4f3dcc2 (Fix 'git show' on signed
tag of signed tag of commit, 2008-07-01) lost this check and made it
segfault instead; not good.
This fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Dongcan Jiang
Max Kirillov
Jeff King
Junio C Hamano
Thomas Rast