Граф коммитов

4 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Johannes Schindelin e145d99347 rebase -r: support merge strategies other than `recursive`
We already support merge strategies in the sequencer, but only for
`pick` commands.

With this commit, we now also support them in `merge` commands. The
approach is simple: if any merge strategy option is specified, or if any
merge strategy other than `recursive` is specified, we simply spawn the
`git merge` command. Otherwise, we handle the merge in-process just as
before.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-07-31 12:24:07 -07:00
Johannes Schindelin db4a3f26c3 tests: mark a couple more test cases as requiring `rebase -p`
The `--preserve-merges` option has been deprecated, and as a consequence
we started to mark test cases that require that option to be supported,
in preparation for removing that support eventually.

Since we marked those test cases, a couple more crept into the test
suite, and with this patch, we mark them, too.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-05-28 13:22:32 -07:00
Elijah Newren c840e1af09 git-rebase: error out when incompatible options passed
git rebase has three different types: am, merge, and interactive, all of
which are implemented in terms of separate scripts.  am builds on git-am,
merge builds on git-merge-recursive, and interactive builds on
git-cherry-pick.  We make use of features in those lower-level commands in
the different rebase types, but those features don't exist in all of the
lower level commands so we have a range of incompatibilities.  Previously,
we just accepted nearly any argument and silently ignored whichever ones
weren't implemented for the type of rebase specified.  Change this so the
incompatibilities are documented, included in the testsuite, and tested
for at runtime with an appropriate error message shown.

Some exceptions I left out:

  * --merge and --interactive are technically incompatible since they are
    supposed to run different underlying scripts, but with a few small
    changes, --interactive can do everything that --merge can.  In fact,
    I'll shortly be sending another patch to remove git-rebase--merge and
    reimplement it on top of git-rebase--interactive.

  * One could argue that --interactive and --quiet are incompatible since
    --interactive doesn't implement a --quiet mode (perhaps since
    cherry-pick itself does not implement one).  However, the interactive
    mode is more quiet than the other modes in general with progress
    messages, so one could argue that it's already quiet.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-27 11:23:22 -07:00
Elijah Newren 9929430c32 t3422: new testcases for checking when incompatible options passed
git rebase is split into three types: am, merge, and interactive.  Various
options imply different types, and which mode we are using determine which
sub-script (git-rebase--$type) is executed to finish the work.  Not all
options work with all types, so add tests for combinations where we expect
to receive an error rather than having options be silently ignored.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-27 11:23:22 -07:00