We don't call this function, and never have. The on-disk
bitmap format uses network-byte-order integers, meaning that
we cannot use the native-byte-order format written here.
Let's drop it in the name of simplicity.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We don't call this function, and in fact never have since it
was added (at least not in iterations of the ewah patches
that got merged). Instead we use ewah_read_mmap().
Let's drop the unused code.
Note to anybody who later wants to resurrect this: it does
not check for integer overflow in the ewah data size,
meaning it may be possible to convince the code to allocate
a too-small buffer and read() into it.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Reported-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The on-disk ewah format tells us how big the ewah data is,
and we blindly read that much from the buffer without
considering whether the mmap'd data is long enough, which
can lead to out-of-bound reads.
Let's make sure we have data available before reading it,
both for the ewah header/footer as well as for the bit data
itself. In particular:
- keep our ptr/len pair in sync as we move through the
buffer, and check it before each read
- check the size for integer overflow (this should be
impossible on 64-bit, as the size is given as a 32-bit
count of 8-byte words, but is possible on a 32-bit
system)
- return the number of bytes read as an ssize_t instead of
an int, again to prevent integer overflow
- compute the return value using a pointer difference;
this should yield the same result as the existing code,
but makes it more obvious that we got our computations
right
The included test is far from comprehensive, as it just
picks a static point at which to truncate the generated
bitmap. But in practice this will hit in the middle of an
ewah and make sure we're at least exercising this code.
Reported-by: Luat Nguyen <root@l4w.io>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The mailing address for the FSF has changed over the years. Rather than
updating the address across all files, refer readers to gnu.org, as the
GNU GPL documentation now suggests for license notices. The mailing
address is retained in the full license files (COPYING and LGPL-2.1).
The old address is still present in t/diff-lib/COPYING. This is
intentional, as the file is used in tests and the contents are not
expected to change.
Signed-off-by: Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The ewah subsystem typedefs eword_t to be uint64_t, but some
code uses a bare uint64_t. This isn't a bug now, but it's a
potential maintenance problem if the definition of eword_t
ever changes. Let's use the correct type.
Note that we can't use COPY_ARRAY() here because the source
and destination point to objects of different sizes. For
that reason we'll also skip the usual "sizeof(*dst)" and use
the real type, which should make it more clear that there's
something tricky going on.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Now that we're built around xmalloc and friends, we can use
helpers like REALLOC_ARRAY, ALLOC_GROW, and so on to make
the code shorter and protect against integer overflow.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This code was originally written with the idea that it could
be spun off into its own ewah library, and uses the
overrideable ewah_malloc to do allocations.
We plug in xmalloc as our ewah_malloc, of course. But over
the years the ewah code itself has become more entangled
with git, and the return value of many ewah_malloc sites is
not checked.
Let's just drop the level of indirection and use xmalloc and
friends directly. This saves a few lines, and will let us
adapt these sites to our more advanced malloc helpers.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit a201c20 tried to optimize out a loop like:
for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
data[i] = ntohll(data[i]);
in the big-endian case, because we know that ntohll is a
noop, and we do not need to pay the cost of the loop at all.
However, it mistakenly assumed that __BYTE_ORDER was always
defined, whereas it may not be on systems which do not
define it by default, and where we did not need to define it
to set up the ntohll macro. This includes OS X and Windows.
We could muck with the ordering in compat/bswap.h to make
sure it is defined unconditionally, but it is simpler to
still to just execute the loop unconditionally. That avoids
the application code knowing anything about these magic
macros, and lets it depend only on having ntohll defined.
And since the resulting loop looks like (on a big-endian
system):
for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
data[i] = data[i];
any decent compiler can probably optimize it out.
Original report and analysis by Brian Gernhardt.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The caller may hand us an unaligned buffer (e.g., because it
is an mmap of a file with many ewah bitmaps). On some
platforms (like SPARC) this can cause a bus error. We can
fix it with a combination of get_be32 and moving the data
into an aligned buffer (which we would do anyway, but we can
move it before fixing the endianness).
Signed-off-by: Vicent Marti <tanoku@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
EWAH is a word-aligned compressed variant of a bitset (i.e. a data
structure that acts as a 0-indexed boolean array for many entries).
It uses a 64-bit run-length encoding (RLE) compression scheme,
trading some compression for better processing speed.
The goal of this word-aligned implementation is not to achieve
the best compression, but rather to improve query processing time.
As it stands right now, this EWAH implementation will always be more
efficient storage-wise than its uncompressed alternative.
EWAH arrays will be used as the on-disk format to store reachability
bitmaps for all objects in a repository while keeping reasonable sizes,
in the same way that JGit does.
This EWAH implementation is a mostly straightforward port of the
original `javaewah` library that JGit currently uses. The library is
self-contained and has been embedded whole (4 files) inside the `ewah`
folder to ease redistribution.
The library is re-licensed under the GPLv2 with the permission of Daniel
Lemire, the original author. The source code for the C version can
be found on GitHub:
https://github.com/vmg/libewok
The original Java implementation can also be found on GitHub:
https://github.com/lemire/javaewah
[jc: stripped debug-only code per Peff's $gmane/239768]
Signed-off-by: Vicent Marti <tanoku@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Helped-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Jeff King
Derrick Stolee
Todd Zullinger
Junio C Hamano
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
Vicent Marti