We just started preparing t5515 for the upcoming change of the default
branch name to `main`. This patch adjusts roughly half of the supporting
material in `t/t5515/` (the patch adjusting all of `t/t5515/` would have
weighed more than 100kB and therefore not made it to the Git mailing
list for review).
Similar to what we did for the `t5515` script itself in the previous
commit, this patch was generated via:
sed -i -e 's/master/main/g' -e 's/Master/Main/g' \
-e 's/6c9dec2b923228c9ff994c6cfe4ae16c12408dc5/ecf3b3627b498bdcb735cc4343bf165f76964e9a/g' \
-e 's/8521c3072461fcfe8f32d67f95cc6e6b832a2db2fa29769ffc788bce85ebcd75/fff666109892bb4b1c80cd1649d2d8762a0663db8b5d46c8be98360b64fbba5f/g' \
-e 's/754b754407bf032e9a2f9d5a9ad05ca79a6b228f/b4ab76b1a01ea602209932134a44f1e6bd610832/g' \
-e 's/6c7abaea8a6d8ef4d89877e68462758dc6774690fbbbb0e6d7dd57415c9abde0/380ebae0113f877ce46fcdf39d5bc33e4dc0928db5c5a4d5fdc78381c4d55ae3/g' \
-- t/t5515/fetch.*
In addition to that, we need to adjust some file _names_ in `t/t5515/`
because they encode the branch name:
eval "$(git ls-files t/t5515/fetch.\* | sed -n \
-e 's/\(.*\)master\(.*\)/git mv & \1main\2;/p')"
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We do not want to record tags as parents of a merge when the user does
"git pull $there tag v1.0" to merge tagged commit, but that is not a good
enough excuse to peel the tag down to commit when storing in FETCH_HEAD.
The caller of underlying "git fetch $there tag v1.0" may have other uses
of information contained in v1.0 tag in mind.
[jc: the test adjustment is to update for the new expectation]
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
My prior bug fix for git-push titled "Don't configure remote "." to
fetch everything to itself" actually broke t5520 as we were unable
to evaluate a branch configuration of:
[branch "copy"]
remote = .
merge = refs/heads/master
as remote "." did not have a "remote...fetch" configuration entry to
offer up refs/heads/master as a possible candidate available to be
fetched and merged. In shell script git-fetch and prior to the above
mentioned commit this was hardcoded for a url of "." to be the set of
local branches.
Chasing down this bug led me to the conclusion that our prior behavior
with regards to branch.$name.merge was incorrect. In the shell script
based git-fetch implementation we only fetched and merged a branch if
it appeared both in branch.$name.merge *and* in remote.$r.fetch, where
$r = branch.$name.remote. In other words in the following config file:
[remote "origin"]
url = git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git
fetch = refs/heads/master:refs/remotes/origin/master
[branch "master"]
remote = origin
merge = refs/heads/master
[branch "pu"]
remote = origin
merge = refs/heads/pu
Attempting to run `git pull` while on branch "pu" would always give
the user "Already up-to-date" as git-fetch did not fetch pu and thus
did not mark it for merge in .git/FETCH_HEAD. The configured merge
would always be ignored and the user would be left scratching her
confused head wondering why merge did not work on "pu" but worked
fine on "master".
If we are using the "default fetch" specification for the current
branch and the current branch has a branch.$name.merge configured
we now union it with the list of refs in remote.$r.fetch. This
way the above configuration does what the user expects it to do,
which is to fetch only "master" by default but when on "pu" to
fetch both "master" and "pu".
This uncovered some breakage in the test suite where old-style Cogito
branches (.git/branches/$r) did not fetch the branches listed in
.git/config for merging and thus did not actually merge them if the
user tried to use `git pull` on that branch. Junio and I discussed
it on list and felt that the union approach here makes more sense to
DWIM for the end-user than silently ignoring their configured request
so the test vectors for t5515 have been updated to include for-merge
lines in .git/FETCH_HEAD where they have been configured for-merge
in .git/config.
Since we are now performing a union of the fetch specification and
the merge specification and we cannot allow a branch to be listed
twice (otherwise it comes out twice in .git/FETCH_HEAD) we need to
perform a double loop here over all of the branch.$name.merge lines
and try to set their merge flag if we have already schedule that
branch for fetching by remote.$r.fetch. If no match is found then
we must add new specifications to fetch the branch but not store it
as no local tracking branch has been designated.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Johannes Schindelin
Linus Torvalds
Shawn O. Pearce
Santi Béjar