зеркало из https://github.com/microsoft/git.git
2b916ffa18
* jn/update-contrib-example-merge: (24 commits) merge script: learn --[no-]rerere-autoupdate merge script: notice @{-1} shorthand merge script: handle --no-ff --no-commit correctly merge script: --ff-only to disallow true merge merge script: handle many-way octopus merge script: handle -m --log correctly merge script: forbid merge -s index merge script: allow custom strategies merge script: merge -X<option> merge script: improve log message subject merge script: refuse to merge during merge merge script: tweak unmerged files message to match builtin merge script: --squash, --ff from unborn branch are errors fmt-merge-msg -m to override merge title merge-base --independent to print reduced parent list in a merge merge-base --octopus to mimic show-branch --merge-base Documentation: add a SEE ALSO section for merge-base t6200 (fmt-merge-msg): style nitpicks t6010 (merge-base): modernize style t7600 (merge): test merge from branch yet to be born ... |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
blameview | ||
buildsystems | ||
ciabot | ||
completion | ||
continuous | ||
convert-objects | ||
emacs | ||
examples | ||
fast-import | ||
gitview | ||
hg-to-git | ||
hooks | ||
p4import | ||
patches | ||
stats | ||
svn-fe | ||
thunderbird-patch-inline | ||
vim | ||
workdir | ||
README | ||
git-resurrect.sh | ||
remotes2config.sh | ||
rerere-train.sh |
README
Contributed Software Although these pieces are available as part of the official git source tree, they are in somewhat different status. The intention is to keep interesting tools around git here, maybe even experimental ones, to give users an easier access to them, and to give tools wider exposure, so that they can be improved faster. I am not expecting to touch these myself that much. As far as my day-to-day operation is concerned, these subdirectories are owned by their respective primary authors. I am willing to help if users of these components and the contrib/ subtree "owners" have technical/design issues to resolve, but the initiative to fix and/or enhance things _must_ be on the side of the subtree owners. IOW, I won't be actively looking for bugs and rooms for enhancements in them as the git maintainer -- I may only do so just as one of the users when I want to scratch my own itch. If you have patches to things in contrib/ area, the patch should be first sent to the primary author, and then the primary author should ack and forward it to me (git pull request is nicer). This is the same way as how I have been treating gitk, and to a lesser degree various foreign SCM interfaces, so you know the drill. I expect that things that start their life in the contrib/ area to graduate out of contrib/ once they mature, either by becoming projects on their own, or moving to the toplevel directory. On the other hand, I expect I'll be proposing removal of disused and inactive ones from time to time. If you have new things to add to this area, please first propose it on the git mailing list, and after a list discussion proves there are some general interests (it does not have to be a list-wide consensus for a tool targeted to a relatively narrow audience -- for example I do not work with projects whose upstream is svn, so I have no use for git-svn myself, but it is of general interest for people who need to interoperate with SVN repositories in a way git-svn works better than git-svnimport), submit a patch to create a subdirectory of contrib/ and put your stuff there. -jc