зеркало из https://github.com/microsoft/git.git
5f02274e4c
Reimplement 'git pull' in C. * pt/pull-builtin: pull: remove redirection to git-pull.sh pull --rebase: error on no merge candidate cases pull --rebase: exit early when the working directory is dirty pull: configure --rebase via branch.<name>.rebase or pull.rebase pull: teach git pull about --rebase pull: set reflog message pull: implement pulling into an unborn branch pull: fast-forward working tree if head is updated pull: check if in unresolved merge state pull: support pull.ff config pull: error on no merge candidates pull: pass git-fetch's options to git-fetch pull: pass git-merge's options to git-merge pull: pass verbosity, --progress flags to fetch and merge pull: implement fetch + merge pull: implement skeletal builtin pull argv-array: implement argv_array_pushv() parse-options-cb: implement parse_opt_passthru_argv() parse-options-cb: implement parse_opt_passthru() |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
buildsystems | ||
completion | ||
contacts | ||
convert-objects | ||
credential | ||
diff-highlight | ||
emacs | ||
examples | ||
fast-import | ||
git-jump | ||
git-shell-commands | ||
gitview | ||
hg-to-git | ||
hooks | ||
mw-to-git | ||
persistent-https | ||
remote-helpers | ||
stats | ||
subtree | ||
svn-fe | ||
thunderbird-patch-inline | ||
workdir | ||
README | ||
convert-grafts-to-replace-refs.sh | ||
git-resurrect.sh | ||
remotes2config.sh | ||
rerere-train.sh |
README
Contributed Software Although these pieces are available as part of the official git source tree, they are in somewhat different status. The intention is to keep interesting tools around git here, maybe even experimental ones, to give users an easier access to them, and to give tools wider exposure, so that they can be improved faster. I am not expecting to touch these myself that much. As far as my day-to-day operation is concerned, these subdirectories are owned by their respective primary authors. I am willing to help if users of these components and the contrib/ subtree "owners" have technical/design issues to resolve, but the initiative to fix and/or enhance things _must_ be on the side of the subtree owners. IOW, I won't be actively looking for bugs and rooms for enhancements in them as the git maintainer -- I may only do so just as one of the users when I want to scratch my own itch. If you have patches to things in contrib/ area, the patch should be first sent to the primary author, and then the primary author should ack and forward it to me (git pull request is nicer). This is the same way as how I have been treating gitk, and to a lesser degree various foreign SCM interfaces, so you know the drill. I expect that things that start their life in the contrib/ area to graduate out of contrib/ once they mature, either by becoming projects on their own, or moving to the toplevel directory. On the other hand, I expect I'll be proposing removal of disused and inactive ones from time to time. If you have new things to add to this area, please first propose it on the git mailing list, and after a list discussion proves there are some general interests (it does not have to be a list-wide consensus for a tool targeted to a relatively narrow audience -- for example I do not work with projects whose upstream is svn, so I have no use for git-svn myself, but it is of general interest for people who need to interoperate with SVN repositories in a way git-svn works better than git-svnimport), submit a patch to create a subdirectory of contrib/ and put your stuff there. -jc