2021-09-26 01:24:39 +03:00
|
|
|
load("//tools/build_defs/oss:rn_defs.bzl", "ANDROID", "APPLE", "CXX", "rn_xplat_cxx_library", "subdir_glob")
|
Make async calls work
Summary:
JSCallInvoker requires a `std::weak_ptr<Instance>` to create. In our C++, `CatalystInstance` is responsible for creating this `Instance` object. This `CatalystInstance` C++ initialization is separate from the `TurboModuleManager` C++ initialization. Therefore, in this diff, I made `CatalystInstance` responsible for creating the `JSCallInvoker`. It then exposes the `JSCallInvoker` using a hybrid class called `JSCallInvokerHolder`, which contains a `std::shared_ptr<JSCallInvoker>` member variable. Using `CatalystInstance.getJSCallInvokerHolder()` in TurboModuleManager.java, we get a handle to this hybrid container. Then, we pass it this hybrid object to `TurboModuleManager::initHybrid`, which retrieves the `std::shared_ptr<JSCallInvoker>` from the `JavaJSCallInvokerHandler`.
There were a few cyclic dependencies, so I had to break down the buck targets:
- `CatalystInstanceImpl.java` depends on `JSCallInvokerHolderImpl.java`, and `TurboModuleManager.java` depends on classes that are packaged with `CatalystInstanceImpl.java`. So, I had to put `JSCallInvokerHolderImpl.java` in its own buck target.
- `CatalystInstance.cpp` depends on `JavaJSCallInvokerHolder.cpp`, and `TurboModuleManager.cpp` depends on classes that are build with `CatalystInstance.cpp`. So, I had to put `JavaJSCallInvokerHolder.cpp` in its own buck target. To make things simpler, I also moved `JSCallInvoker.{cpp,h}` files into the same buck target as `JavaJSCallInvokerHolder.{cpp,h}`.
I think these steps should be enough to create the TurboModuleManager without needing a bridge:
1. Make `JSCallInvoker` an abstract base class.
2. On Android, create another derived class of `JSCallInvoker` that doesn't depend on Instance.
3. Create `JavaJSCallInvokerHolder` using an instance of this new class somewhere in C++.
4. Pass this instance of `JavaJSCallInvokerHolder` to Java and use it to create/instatiate `TurboModuleManager`.
Regarding steps 1 and 2, we can also make JSCallInvoker accept a lambda.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D15055511
fbshipit-source-id: 0ad72a86599819ec35d421dbee7e140959a26ab6
2019-05-03 23:25:56 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rn_xplat_cxx_library(
|
2019-09-20 20:48:50 +03:00
|
|
|
name = "callinvoker",
|
2019-07-13 08:34:14 +03:00
|
|
|
srcs = glob(["**/*.cpp"]),
|
Make async calls work
Summary:
JSCallInvoker requires a `std::weak_ptr<Instance>` to create. In our C++, `CatalystInstance` is responsible for creating this `Instance` object. This `CatalystInstance` C++ initialization is separate from the `TurboModuleManager` C++ initialization. Therefore, in this diff, I made `CatalystInstance` responsible for creating the `JSCallInvoker`. It then exposes the `JSCallInvoker` using a hybrid class called `JSCallInvokerHolder`, which contains a `std::shared_ptr<JSCallInvoker>` member variable. Using `CatalystInstance.getJSCallInvokerHolder()` in TurboModuleManager.java, we get a handle to this hybrid container. Then, we pass it this hybrid object to `TurboModuleManager::initHybrid`, which retrieves the `std::shared_ptr<JSCallInvoker>` from the `JavaJSCallInvokerHandler`.
There were a few cyclic dependencies, so I had to break down the buck targets:
- `CatalystInstanceImpl.java` depends on `JSCallInvokerHolderImpl.java`, and `TurboModuleManager.java` depends on classes that are packaged with `CatalystInstanceImpl.java`. So, I had to put `JSCallInvokerHolderImpl.java` in its own buck target.
- `CatalystInstance.cpp` depends on `JavaJSCallInvokerHolder.cpp`, and `TurboModuleManager.cpp` depends on classes that are build with `CatalystInstance.cpp`. So, I had to put `JavaJSCallInvokerHolder.cpp` in its own buck target. To make things simpler, I also moved `JSCallInvoker.{cpp,h}` files into the same buck target as `JavaJSCallInvokerHolder.{cpp,h}`.
I think these steps should be enough to create the TurboModuleManager without needing a bridge:
1. Make `JSCallInvoker` an abstract base class.
2. On Android, create another derived class of `JSCallInvoker` that doesn't depend on Instance.
3. Create `JavaJSCallInvokerHolder` using an instance of this new class somewhere in C++.
4. Pass this instance of `JavaJSCallInvokerHolder` to Java and use it to create/instatiate `TurboModuleManager`.
Regarding steps 1 and 2, we can also make JSCallInvoker accept a lambda.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D15055511
fbshipit-source-id: 0ad72a86599819ec35d421dbee7e140959a26ab6
2019-05-03 23:25:56 +03:00
|
|
|
header_namespace = "",
|
2019-07-13 08:34:14 +03:00
|
|
|
exported_headers = subdir_glob(
|
|
|
|
|
[
|
|
|
|
|
("ReactCommon", "*.h"),
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
prefix = "ReactCommon",
|
|
|
|
|
),
|
2022-08-11 14:37:35 +03:00
|
|
|
compiler_flags_pedantic = True,
|
2022-03-31 00:37:03 +03:00
|
|
|
labels = [
|
2022-04-05 22:15:05 +03:00
|
|
|
"pfh:ReactNative_CommonInfrastructurePlaceholder",
|
2022-03-31 00:37:03 +03:00
|
|
|
"supermodule:xplat/default/public.react_native.infra",
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
2021-09-26 01:24:39 +03:00
|
|
|
platforms = (ANDROID, APPLE, CXX),
|
Make async calls work
Summary:
JSCallInvoker requires a `std::weak_ptr<Instance>` to create. In our C++, `CatalystInstance` is responsible for creating this `Instance` object. This `CatalystInstance` C++ initialization is separate from the `TurboModuleManager` C++ initialization. Therefore, in this diff, I made `CatalystInstance` responsible for creating the `JSCallInvoker`. It then exposes the `JSCallInvoker` using a hybrid class called `JSCallInvokerHolder`, which contains a `std::shared_ptr<JSCallInvoker>` member variable. Using `CatalystInstance.getJSCallInvokerHolder()` in TurboModuleManager.java, we get a handle to this hybrid container. Then, we pass it this hybrid object to `TurboModuleManager::initHybrid`, which retrieves the `std::shared_ptr<JSCallInvoker>` from the `JavaJSCallInvokerHandler`.
There were a few cyclic dependencies, so I had to break down the buck targets:
- `CatalystInstanceImpl.java` depends on `JSCallInvokerHolderImpl.java`, and `TurboModuleManager.java` depends on classes that are packaged with `CatalystInstanceImpl.java`. So, I had to put `JSCallInvokerHolderImpl.java` in its own buck target.
- `CatalystInstance.cpp` depends on `JavaJSCallInvokerHolder.cpp`, and `TurboModuleManager.cpp` depends on classes that are build with `CatalystInstance.cpp`. So, I had to put `JavaJSCallInvokerHolder.cpp` in its own buck target. To make things simpler, I also moved `JSCallInvoker.{cpp,h}` files into the same buck target as `JavaJSCallInvokerHolder.{cpp,h}`.
I think these steps should be enough to create the TurboModuleManager without needing a bridge:
1. Make `JSCallInvoker` an abstract base class.
2. On Android, create another derived class of `JSCallInvoker` that doesn't depend on Instance.
3. Create `JavaJSCallInvokerHolder` using an instance of this new class somewhere in C++.
4. Pass this instance of `JavaJSCallInvokerHolder` to Java and use it to create/instatiate `TurboModuleManager`.
Regarding steps 1 and 2, we can also make JSCallInvoker accept a lambda.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D15055511
fbshipit-source-id: 0ad72a86599819ec35d421dbee7e140959a26ab6
2019-05-03 23:25:56 +03:00
|
|
|
preferred_linkage = "static",
|
|
|
|
|
preprocessor_flags = [
|
|
|
|
|
"-DLOG_TAG=\"ReactNative\"",
|
|
|
|
|
"-DWITH_FBSYSTRACE=1",
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
visibility = [
|
|
|
|
|
"PUBLIC",
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
