Summary:
This is my proposal for fixing `use_frameworks!` compatibility without breaking all `<React/*>` imports I outlined in https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/25393#issuecomment-508457700. If accepted, it will fix https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/25349.
It builds on the changes I made in https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/25496 by ensuring each podspec has a unique value for `header_dir` so that framework imports do not conflict. Every podspec which should be included in the `<React/*>` namespace now includes it's headers from `React-Core.podspec`.
The following pods can still be imported with `<React/*>` and so should not have breaking changes: `React-ART`,`React-DevSupport`, `React-CoreModules`, `React-RCTActionSheet`, `React-RCTAnimation`, `React-RCTBlob`, `React-RCTImage`, `React-RCTLinking`, `React-RCTNetwork`, `React-RCTPushNotification`, `React-RCTSettings`, `React-RCTText`, `React-RCTSettings`, `React-RCTVibration`, `React-RCTWebSocket` .
There are still a few breaking changes which I hope will be acceptable:
- `React-Core.podspec` has been moved to the root of the project. Any `Podfile` that references it will need to update the path.
- ~~`React-turbomodule-core`'s headers now live under `<turbomodule/*>`~~ Replaced by https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/25619#issuecomment-511091823.
- ~~`React-turbomodulesamples`'s headers now live under `<turbomodulesamples/*>`~~ Replaced by https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/25619#issuecomment-511091823.
- ~~`React-TypeSaferty`'s headers now live under `<TypeSafety/*>`~~ Replaced by https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/25619#issuecomment-511040967.
- ~~`React-jscallinvoker`'s headers now live under `<jscallinvoker/*>`~~ Replaced by https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/25619#issuecomment-511091823.
- Each podspec now uses `s.static_framework = true`. This means that a minimum of CocoaPods 1.5 ([released in April 2018](http://blog.cocoapods.org/CocoaPods-1.5.0/)) is now required. This is needed so that the ` __has_include` conditions can still work when frameworks are enabled.
Still to do:
- ~~Including `React-turbomodule-core` with `use_frameworks!` enabled causes the C++ import failures we saw in https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/25349. I'm sure it will be possible to fix this but I need to dig deeper (perhaps a custom modulemap would be needed).~~ Addressed by 33573511f0.
- I haven't got Fabric working yet. I wonder if it would be acceptable to move Fabric out of the `<React/*>` namespace since it is new? �
## Changelog
[iOS] [Fixed] - Fixed compatibility with CocoaPods frameworks.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/25619
Test Plan:
### FB
```
buck build catalyst
```
### Sample Project
Everything should work exactly as before, where `use_frameworks!` is not in `Podfile`s. I have a branch on my [sample project](https://github.com/jtreanor/react-native-cocoapods-frameworks) here which has `use_frameworks!` in its `Podfile` to demonstrate this is fixed.
You can see that it works with these steps:
1. `git clone git@github.com:jtreanor/react-native-cocoapods-frameworks.git`
2. `git checkout fix-frameworks-subspecs`
3. `cd ios && pod install`
4. `cd .. && react-native run-ios`
The sample app will build and run successfully. To see that it still works without frameworks, remove `use_frameworks!` from the `Podfile` and do steps 3 and 4 again.
### RNTesterPods
`RNTesterPodsPods` can now work with or without `use_frameworks!`.
1. Go to the `RNTester` directory and run `pod install`.
2. Run the tests in `RNTesterPods.xcworkspace` to see that everything still works fine.
3. Uncomment the `use_frameworks!` line at the top of `RNTester/Podfile` and run `pod install` again.
4. Run the tests again and see that it still works with frameworks enabled.
Reviewed By: PeteTheHeat
Differential Revision: D16465247
Pulled By: PeteTheHeat
fbshipit-source-id: cad837e9cced06d30cc5b372af1c65c7780b9e7a
Summary: This change drops the year from the copyright headers and the LICENSE file.
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D9727774
fbshipit-source-id: df4fc1e4390733fe774b1a160dd41b4a3d83302a
Summary:
Includes React Native and its dependencies Fresco, Metro, and Yoga. Excludes samples/examples/docs.
find: ^(?:( *)|( *(?:[\*~#]|::))( )? *)?Copyright (?:\(c\) )?(\d{4})\b.+Facebook[\s\S]+?BSD[\s\S]+?(?:this source tree|the same directory)\.$
replace: $1$2$3Copyright (c) $4-present, Facebook, Inc.\n$2\n$1$2$3This source code is licensed under the MIT license found in the\n$1$2$3LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree.
Reviewed By: TheSavior, yungsters
Differential Revision: D7007050
fbshipit-source-id: 37dd6bf0ffec0923bfc99c260bb330683f35553e
Summary:
This diff attempts to fix a number of iOS native animation bugs related to improper node invalidation and a race with view creation. The major issues were presented in #9120 as problems 3 and 3b, but I'll recap here:
The invalidation model we use is overly complicated and incomplete. The proper combination of `_needsUpdate` and `_hasUpdated` will result in nodes values being recomputed. However, we do not invalidate nodes in all the places we should, e.g. if we create a new view and attach it to an existing value node (see example in #9120). This diff chooses to remove the `_hasUpdated` flag, and simply relies on the `_needsUpdate` flag to mark a node as dirty.
We mark nodes as dirty when they are:
- created
- updated
- attached to new parents
- detached from old parents
- attached to a view
Calling `updateNodeIfNecessary` will, if necessary, compute all invalidated parent values before recomputing the node value. It will then apply the update, and mark the no
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/10663
Differential Revision: D4120301
Pulled By: mkonicek
fbshipit-source-id: e247afcb5d8c15999b8328c664b9f7e764d76a75
Summary:
This diff addresses the issues raised by kmagiera in https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7884. Transforms should be applied in the order they are defined, just like in `processTransform.js`. A scale applied before a translation, for instance, should give a different result than a translation applied before a scale.
We leverage CATransform3D to do the heavy lifting. A concatenated transform is passed all the way to `RCTViewPropertyMapper`. It is compared with the transform currently applied to the view, and if different, applied. The same approach is used for opacity.
I think it makes the most sense to do this diffing in `RCTViewPropertyMapper`, as opposed to creating and cleaning up an `_updatedPropsDictionary` each frame in `RCTTransformAnimatedNode` and `RCTStyleAnimatedNode`. The node should keep its full value; applying a minimal set of altered props is an optimization. The higher up this optimization is implemented, the more assumptions it makes. e.g. that there will only ever be a sing
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/9050
Differential Revision: D3658139
fbshipit-source-id: ad6286762ef734084cbdf83c9bd9241190302d34
Summary:
Currently on iOS animations are being performed on the JS thread. This ports animations over to the native thread and performs them natively. A lot of this work has already been done on Android, but this PR enables a few animation nodes that Android doesn't yet support such as Transform, Multiplication, and Addition nodes.
Also there is a demo of the native animations added to the UIExplorer app.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7884
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3409179
Pulled By: nicklockwood
fbshipit-source-id: ef2d8840032e0c32f49e4a16ba86d448662e1751
Summary:
Currently on iOS animations are being performed on the JS thread. This ports animations over to the native thread and performs them natively. A lot of this work has already been done on Android, but this PR enables a few animation nodes that Android doesn't yet support such as Transform, Multiplication, and Addition nodes.
Also there is a demo of the native animations added to the UIExplorer app.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7884
Differential Revision: D3401811
Pulled By: nicklockwood
fbshipit-source-id: 709e533243130153febef03ddd60d39e9fe70e3e
Summary:
Currently on iOS animations are being performed on the JS thread. This ports animations over to the native thread and performs them natively. A lot of this work has already been done on Android, but this PR enables a few animation nodes that Android doesn't yet support such as Transform, Multiplication, and Addition nodes.
Also there is a demo of the native animations added to the UIExplorer app.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7884
Differential Revision: D3401811
Pulled By: nicklockwood
fbshipit-source-id: c8d750b75e4410923e17eaeb6dcaf079a09942e2