Summary:
This fixing a crash in RCTNativeAnimatedModule caused by accessing an `RCTSurfacePreseter` instance as "Objective-C runtime associated object" which was retained with `OBJC_ASSOCIATION_ASSIGN` policy. The documentation for `OBJC_ASSOCIATION_ASSIGN` says "Specifies a weak reference to the associated object." but it's a lie ( https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16569840/using-objc-setassociatedobject-with-weak-references) ). The policy is actually `ASSIGN` (aka `unsafe-unretained`).
That's why it's crashing.
We change that to `OBJC_ASSOCIATION_RETAIN` to retain the object (which meets the expectation of the interface of the category).
We also should not have over-retaining issues because:
* SurfacePresenter does not retain a Bridge or any object that can retain a Bridge;
* SurfacePresenter is a long-living object, we don't recreate it during bridge reloading or stuff like that.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D19333869
fbshipit-source-id: 1ff03659a880f2742b909c5668c47144719eeee2
Summary: The previous rename from RCT->RN prefix ended up causing some confusions on which prefix to use for which files and under what circumstances. To avoid further confusion before we're done with the re-architecture project, let's keep them as RCT.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D16705566
fbshipit-source-id: 395bff771c84e5ded6b2261a84c7549df1e6c5e5
Summary: Fabric ObjC(++) files will be prefixed by RN* for the time being, this codemod is a simple rename. This includes `interface` and `protocol` definition
Reviewed By: PeteTheHeat, yungsters
Differential Revision: D16611524
fbshipit-source-id: 868d2571ea2414dde4cbb3b75b1334b779b5d832
Summary:
Duplicate category method implementations cause undefined behavior in Objective-C; one is chosen essentially at random. The linker also issues a noisy warning about this (which is how I noticed this case).
It didn't matter in this particular case since both implementations do the same thing, but we should clean this up so people don't get desensitized to these linker warnings. There is no need to have two implementations.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D16587219
fbshipit-source-id: 56dc3493735443c476484092f4a7eacfcddee8cb
Valentin Shergin
Andres Suarez
Kevin Gozali
Adam Ernst
zhongwuzw
