Summary:
Right now we rely on the Paper UIManager to update animated node graphs - this hooks us into `RCTSurfacePresenter` in the same way so we are no longer reliant on Paper. Should also help with complex ordering corner cases with pre vs. post operations and restoring defaults when nodes are removed. More info:
https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/11819/files
Note that we don't have a way to differentiate animation nodes related to fabric views vs. paper views, so if paper and fabric are both rendering updates simultaneously it's possible they could get processed by the wrong callback. That should be very rare, rarely cause problems even if it does happen, and won't be a problem at all in a post-Paper world.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D14336760
fbshipit-source-id: 1c6a72fa67d5fedbaefb21cd4d7e5d75484f4fae
Summary:
Not super clean, but not terrible.
Unfortunately this still relies on the old Paper UIManager calling delegate methods to flush the operations queues. This will work for Marketplace You since Paper will be active, but we need to fix this, along with Animated Events which don't work at all yet.
Random aside: it seems like taps are less responsive in fabric vs. paper, at least on iOS. There is a sporadic delay between the touches event coming in nativly to the JS callback invoking the native module function to start the animation - this will need some debugging.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D14143331
fbshipit-source-id: 63a17eaafa1217d77a532a2716d9f886a96fae59
Summary:
`RCTSurfaceHostingProxyRootView` surfaces are still automatically started right after the initialization to match `RCTRootView` interface, but `RCTSurfaceHostingView` must be started explicitly now. Also fixed some internal stuff so start and register are clear and distinct.
Background / initial motivation:
One tricky bit - we render the template as part of init`ing the rootView, so we don't know what the surfaceId will be before hand to register the UITemplate. Two possible solutions:
1) Require start be called explicitly after initializing the rootView, and setup the context in between.
2) Do something like "setUITemplateConfigForNextSurface" before creating the rootView, and have some hook when the surfaceId is assigned that associates the surfaceId with that "next" UITemplate stuff before.
(1) seems a lot cleaner, but it requires ever user of rootView to explicitly call start on it - how do you feel about that? Seems like we could also use that start call to decide if the initial render should be synchronous or not? start vs. startSync?
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D13372914
fbshipit-source-id: 6db297870610e6c231f8a78c0dd74d584cb64910
Summary: We need a way for different apps to inject dependencies or additional functionality into Fabric - ReactNativeConfig might be a special case, but I think this could clean up it's integration nicely, and I'm using this for a uitemplate cache system so we can use CompactDisk or other storage systems for caching depending on the app.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D13407287
fbshipit-source-id: 45481908434e6235850aa4d2d6b2bfb936a23be7
Summary: Each app may provide different impl for its runtime specific behaviors, then Fabric and other new infra can share the same config instance to configure stuffs.
Reviewed By: sahrens
Differential Revision: D13290319
fbshipit-source-id: 30e3eeedc6ff6ef250ed233b27e38cb7c1062b55
Summary:
The whole mounting iOS infra now uses `ComponentHandle` instead of `std::string` as a reference to particular `ComponentView` implementation. All changes are pretty straightforward, we use a different thing/type to refer to the particular class; no changes in the logic besides a new `RCTComponentViewFactory` that serves the same role of classes registry as Objective-C runtime served previously.
That has several benefits:
* It should be slightly faster, mostly because we don't need to convert `char *` strings to `std::string` and then to `NSString *`.
* We don't need string-based component-name maps anymore (at least on this layer). We can call classes as we want and it will work because of classes are now explicit about which ShadowNodes they are compatible with.
* Most importantly, it's explicit now! That means that no runtime magic is involved anymore and we can rely on static linting tool now and not be afraid of improper code stripping/overoptimization.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D13130760
fbshipit-source-id: aadf70525a1335b96992443abae4da359efdc829
Summary: Trivial. We don't use it anymore.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D12876743
fbshipit-source-id: dc979aaea1fef443b8caf2e58d44b0c7aad90246
Summary:
This diff introduces a new integration concept (called RuntimeExecutor) which consolidates `Runtime` and the dispatching mechanism.
As simple as that:
`using RuntimeExecutor = std::function<void(std::function<void(facebook::jsi::Runtime &runtime)> &&callback)>;`
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D12816746
fbshipit-source-id: 9e27ef16b98af861d494fe50c7e50bd0536e6aaf
Summary:
New `ShadowTree::synchronize` method allows to perform operations on ShadowTree without a risk of an unsuccessful commit. To make it happen, the `commitMutex_` is now recursive and `synchronize` acquires it before calling the callback.
Using that we finally can implement reliable `constraintLayout`.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D10174281
fbshipit-source-id: 9864ebb5343d40e2da205272a834710f0ab730db
Summary:
Setting the right expectations: setting layout constraints might fail. Nothing really changed.
Implementing a reliable `constraintLayout` which locks instead of returning immediately requires some additional work and new/additional API.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D10159457
fbshipit-source-id: bb23c7de105629ef086ae0b04667ff32c6ffb81d
Summary: Besides that it's more simple and straight-forward now, we need that to always instantiate Scheduler with a context full of fresh valid objects derived from the new instance of the bridge.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D9995780
fbshipit-source-id: 534a314152d93562b08dd7857962f174b0d06886
Summary: This change drops the year from the copyright headers and the LICENSE file.
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D9727774
fbshipit-source-id: df4fc1e4390733fe774b1a160dd41b4a3d83302a
Summary:
@public
We are moving away from using `RCTBridge` instance in public APIs to enable us using more performance solutions in the future.
This change also fixes "SwipeBack issue" caused by RCTSurfaceHostingProxyRootView returning nil bridge.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D9094625
fbshipit-source-id: 6bde3c54773e75ca4c0b6fd908da9d7235b5c3be
Summary: The app needs to find the surface by rootTag at some point.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D8391957
fbshipit-source-id: b0bb107b7be882071890afb46de17b50e7ee060d
Summary:
RCTSurfacePresenter coordinates presenting of React Native Surfaces and represents application-facing interface of running React Native core.
SurfacePresenter incapsulates a bridge object inside and discourages direct access to it.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D7526413
fbshipit-source-id: 9b6c513ec63a84d8b6c0951458cbd6b47f49669b
Spencer Ahrens
Kevin Gozali
Valentin Shergin
Héctor Ramos