Summary:
Trivial.
If you have troubles with rebasing on top of this revision, run this on your diff:
$ find */*.h */*.mm */*.cpp */*.m -exec clang-format -style=file -i {} \;
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D14018903
fbshipit-source-id: fd0ce2da0e11954e683385402738c701045e727c
Summary:
`RCTSurfaceHostingProxyRootView` surfaces are still automatically started right after the initialization to match `RCTRootView` interface, but `RCTSurfaceHostingView` must be started explicitly now. Also fixed some internal stuff so start and register are clear and distinct.
Background / initial motivation:
One tricky bit - we render the template as part of init`ing the rootView, so we don't know what the surfaceId will be before hand to register the UITemplate. Two possible solutions:
1) Require start be called explicitly after initializing the rootView, and setup the context in between.
2) Do something like "setUITemplateConfigForNextSurface" before creating the rootView, and have some hook when the surfaceId is assigned that associates the surfaceId with that "next" UITemplate stuff before.
(1) seems a lot cleaner, but it requires ever user of rootView to explicitly call start on it - how do you feel about that? Seems like we could also use that start call to decide if the initial render should be synchronous or not? start vs. startSync?
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D13372914
fbshipit-source-id: 6db297870610e6c231f8a78c0dd74d584cb64910
Summary:
So, it does not start itself automatically right after instantiation.
(Classic RCTSurface still kinda start itself automatically but only because start/stop concept is not implemented for this yet.)
Reviewed By: sahrens
Differential Revision: D13461294
fbshipit-source-id: 05430688f69a0d9bf75d03e6d25f02ccd5d3176a
Summary: That's a temporary change that useful only while we don't have deeper/proper intergration with UIKit's navigation infra.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D13104172
fbshipit-source-id: 024e71e04470d56d2c5e9b3f6c3392555ce50b63
Summary:
Setting the right expectations: setting layout constraints might fail. Nothing really changed.
Implementing a reliable `constraintLayout` which locks instead of returning immediately requires some additional work and new/additional API.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D10159457
fbshipit-source-id: bb23c7de105629ef086ae0b04667ff32c6ffb81d
Summary:
The original design of RCTSurface implied that the Surface starts on initialization and stops on deallocation. Recently I realized that this not sufficient API in some cases when the application uses ARC with autorelease pools (that can postpone object deallocations, which is highly undesirable).
And that's simply handy to have those methods sometimes.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D9982356
fbshipit-source-id: baa3bd24804d3708606ebd00b8795f2d5c9d4de9
Summary: All integration with Bridge was removed from RCTFabricSurface, now it's Surface's responsibility to start and stop JS app and register the ShadowTree in the Scheduler.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D9931317
fbshipit-source-id: 55a682f0afb1c542a904e1a8570029e4690967cc
Summary: This change drops the year from the copyright headers and the LICENSE file.
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D9727774
fbshipit-source-id: df4fc1e4390733fe774b1a160dd41b4a3d83302a
Summary:
@public
We are moving away from using `RCTBridge` instance in public APIs to enable us using more performance solutions in the future.
This change also fixes "SwipeBack issue" caused by RCTSurfaceHostingProxyRootView returning nil bridge.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D9094625
fbshipit-source-id: 6bde3c54773e75ca4c0b6fd908da9d7235b5c3be
Summary:
@public
... and we initalize this in Surface.
We need this for requesting images with proper size/pixel-density, setup proper parameters for rasterizing CALayer's and rounding layout metric values.
Then we have to figure out how to wire this up with YGConfig.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D8475639
fbshipit-source-id: cec7af581b94efb4595dcf3f232252ce87a1fde3
Summary:
@public
When JS first starts up, Fabric surface end up double registering itself, causing events to not work. So let's guard it so that registration happens only on reload case.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D8521002
fbshipit-source-id: 441f121786e860dc10e959e940b411c2afaf96dc
Summary:
@public
The bridge may send the reload event twice when reloading JS in some rare condition. The 2nd one was actually when the "new" bridge wasn't valid yet, so log an error if that happens. This may happen if the connection to Metro server gets into a weird state. Restarting Metro would solve the problem.
The issue was that `RCTBridgeWillReloadNotification` fired twice for each reload with metro connected.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D8509448
fbshipit-source-id: 647fb98c0a97503409a10451b8f152145947ae20
Summary:
On JS reload the FabricUIManager and EventDispatcher didn't get release due to a retain cycle. This breaks the cycle.
In addition, force release the Scheduler on reload so that the stale classes get cleaned up properly, avoiding crashes. Also the surface now remounts the content correctly
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D8414916
fbshipit-source-id: 4b14031f29b3bc9987d7aa765dc0d930a7de2b1e
Summary:
RCTSurfaceTouchHandler is a complete rewrite of RCTTouchHandler which uses direct Fabric-specific event dispatching pipeline and several new approaches to managing active events (such as high-performant C++ collections, better management of identifier pool, and so on).
Besides that, the new implementation is much more W3C compliant that it used to be (see old TODOs near `receiveTouches()` implementation in Javascript).
So, touch events work now!
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D8246713
fbshipit-source-id: 218dc15cd8f982237de7e2497ff36a7bfe6d37cc
Summary:
This diff deprecates `-[RCTSurface rootViewTag]` in favour of `-[RCTSurface rootTag]` which returns
same value but represented as `ReactTag` (`long`) instead of `NSNumber *`.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D7857044
fbshipit-source-id: f5427c30d3de2d3563e830f2caac70b7dc9631f9
Summary: RCTFabricSurface was reimplemented as separate class which does not rely on (old) RCTUIManager and delegate some functionality (which must be coordinated between Surface instances and Scheduler) to RCTSurfacePresenter.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D7526404
fbshipit-source-id: e8c38261bc489fd6066ba29a829cd8f623c26217
Valentin Shergin
Spencer Ahrens
Héctor Ramos
Kevin Gozali