Summary:
The static ViewConfig codegen generates the static ViewConfig inside the JavaScript module [under an exported constant](a0a2958cda/packages/react-native-codegen/src/generators/components/GenerateViewConfigJs.js (L127-L129)):
```
export const __INTERNAL_VIEW_CONFIG = VIEW_CONFIG;
export default NativeComponentRegistry.get(nativeComponentName, () => __INTERNAL_VIEW_CONFIG);
```
This exported constant allows us to build a test page that requires all components, and compares their static ViewConfigs with their native ViewConfig.
This diff makes components with hand-written static ViewConfigs also export this __INTERNAL_VIEW_CONFIG const.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: p-sun
Differential Revision: D34541868
fbshipit-source-id: f55dd3f1b161038baaf84cbbf75c1f4041c34647
Summary:
## Impact
Fix the Static ViewConfig for <View/>.
This diff fixes the base ViewConfig for all HostComponents on both platforms. Consequently, it simplifies SVC reconciliation efforts, by nearly eliminating the first of these classes of SVC errors:
1. Unexpected properties in SVC
2. Missing properties in SVC
3. Not matching properites in SVC
## What is the base ViewConfig on each iOS/Android?
**On iOS:**
- All props come from ViewManagers
- All HostComponent ViewManagers extend <View/> ViewManager
https://pxl.cl/1SxdF
Therefore, the base ViewConfig for all components should be <View/>'s static ViewConfig.
**On Android:**
The component model is a bit more complicated:
https://pxl.cl/1Vmp5
Takeaways:
- Props come from Shadow Nodes **and** ViewManagers
- Nearly all HostComponent ViewManagers extend BaseViewManager. But, that's not <View/>'s ViewManager.
- <View/>'s ViewManager is [ReactViewManager](https://fburl.com/code/0zalv8zk), which is a descendent of BaseViewManager, and declares its own ReactProps.
So, on Android, it's not safe for the base ViewConfig to be <View>'s ViewConfig:
1. No components actualy incorportate <View/>'s props
2. Some components don't even incorporate BaseViewManager's props.
So, what should the base ViewConfig be on Android?
- Nearly all components extend BaseViewManager. BaseViewManager must have a shadow node [that extends LayoutShadowNode](https://www.internalfb.com/code/fbsource/[47d68ebc06e64d97da9d069f1ab662b392f0df8a]/xplat/js/react-native-github/ReactAndroid/src/main/java/com/facebook/react/uimanager/BaseViewManager.java?lines=40). Therefore, we'll make the base ViewConfig on Android be generated by BaseViewManager + LayoutShadowNode.
## Changes
In this diff, I removed ReactNativeViewViewConfig, and introduced a new view config called PlatformBaseViewConfig. This ViewConfig partial will capture all the props available on all HostComponents on **both** platforms. This may not necessarily be the props made available on <View/>.
The only components that don't extend the base platform props are: RCTTextInlineImage. What we do with these components is TBD.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: p-sun, yungsters
Differential Revision: D33135055
fbshipit-source-id: 7299f60ae45ed499ce47c0d0a6309a047bff90bb
Summary:
## iOS
On iOS:
- All props come from ViewManagers
- All HostComponent ViewManagers extend <View/> ViewManager
https://pxl.cl/1SxdF
Therefore, it's safe to have all HostComponent Static View Configs extend <View/> Static View Config.
## Android
On Android, the model is a bit more complicated:
https://pxl.cl/1Vmp5
Takeaways:
- Props come from Shadow Nodes **and** ViewManagers
- Nearly all HostComponent ViewManagers extend BaseViewManager. But, that's not <View/>'s ViewManager.
- <View/>'s ViewManager is [ReactViewManager](https://fburl.com/code/0zalv8zk), which is a descendent of BaseViewManager, and declares its own ReactProps.
So, it's not safe to have all Android HostComponent Static View Configs to extend <View/>'s Static View Config:
1. No components actualy incorportate <View/>'s props
2. Some components don't even incorporate BaseViewManager's props.
## Changes
In this diff, I removed ReactNativeViewViewConfig, and introduced a new view config called PlatformBaseViewConfig. This ViewConfig partial will capture all the props available on all HostComponents on **both** platforms. This may not necessarily be the props made available on <View/>.
The only components that don't extend the base platform props are: RCTTextInlineImage. What we do with these components is TBD.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D32187832
fbshipit-source-id: 9a057abb3f58801615891c21e42ad4cfa5c69f21
Summary:
With the conclusion of D27944688 (925af8ddea), this backs out the experiment introduced via D27987619 (f598dd0ee3).
Changelog:
[Internal]
Reviewed By: kacieb
Differential Revision: D28799741
fbshipit-source-id: 607ee85db26326e13dd8ddb52f5aebb732e9a354
Summary:
Sets up an experiment that enables `collapsable` in Fabric for iOS. This will enable us to validate with production data that enabling the use of this prop does not cause unexpected regressions.
Changelog:
[internal]
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D27987619
fbshipit-source-id: 9b1c0ff45bed09b1e72ad7d9c782f07bb4211cc6
Summary:
ES Modules implicitly enable strict mode. Adding the "use strict" directive is, therefore, not required.
This diff removes all "use strict" directives from ES modules.
Changelog:
[Internal]
Reviewed By: motiz88
Differential Revision: D26172715
fbshipit-source-id: 57957bcbb672c4c3e62b1db633cf425c1c9d6430
Summary:
Migrates `View` to use `NativeComponentRegistry`, which enables configuring it to avoid reflection by using a static `ViewConfig`.
Changelog:
[Internal]
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D25136054
fbshipit-source-id: f2abda1105bd2a8b396db6f1a640430b62bbcdaf
Summary:
All of our other JS view configs are gated by the `RN$Bridgeless` flag. This one has been behind a DEV flag instead. We've been using it in DEV for a long time now, so it's probably ok to be in prod, but I figured it's better to just be consistent with the rest of the native components, since we only need this for bridgeless.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: TheSavior
Differential Revision: D19669902
fbshipit-source-id: bd28cf84947bfe298efd95ae07e38c2bf4e45091
Summary:
We are rolling out exact-by-default syntax to xplat/js.
I had to manually move around some comments to preserve proper placement.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: jbrown215
Differential Revision: D18633611
fbshipit-source-id: 48f7468dcc55b1d00985419d035a61c6820b3abe
Summary:
In React Native there are three types of "Native" components.
```
createReactClass with NativeMethodsMixin
```
```
class MyComponent extends ReactNative.NativeComponent
```
```
requireNativeComponent('RCTView')
```
The implementation for how to handle all three of these exists in the React Native Renderer. Refs attached to components created via these methods provide a set of functions such as
```
.measure
.measureInWindow
.measureLayout
.setNativeProps
```
These methods have been used for our core components in the repo to provide a consistent API. Many of the APIs in React Native require a `reactTag` to a host component. This is acquired by calling `findNodeHandle` with any component. `findNodeHandle` works with the first two approaches.
For a lot of our new Fabric APIs, we will require passing a ref to a HostComponent directly instead of relying on `findNodeHandle` to tunnel through the component tree as that behavior isn't safe with React concurrent mode.
The goal of this change is to enable us to differentiate between components created with `requireNativeComponent` and the other types. This will be needed to be able to safely type the new APIs.
For existing components that should support being a host component but need to use some JS behavior in a wrapper, they should use `forwardRef`. The majority of React Native's core components were migrated to use `forwardRef` last year. Components that can't use forwardRef will need to have a method like `getNativeRef()` to get access to the underlying host component ref.
Note, we will need follow up changes as well as changes to the React Renderer in the React repo to fully utilize this new type.
Changelog:
[Internal] Flow type to differentiate between HostComponent and NativeMethodsMixin and NativeComponent
Reviewed By: jbrown215
Differential Revision: D17551089
fbshipit-source-id: 7a30b4bb4323156c0b2465ca41fcd05f4315becf
Summary:
Reverting D16909622 and D16909622 due to T53098065. This change made TouchableNativeFeedback a bit less resilient to non native components being passed as the child. We probably need to handle this migration a little bit safer.
Original commit changeset: 902528623742
Differential Revision: D17096765
fbshipit-source-id: e3fc1a21504459b6d7ea5442c4bc926bbd77379d
Summary:
Instead of dispatching the command with findNodeHandle and the UIManager, go through the new API. This is safe because codegenNativeCommands can work at runtime as well as with the babel transform.
Changelog:
[Internal]
Reviewed By: rickhanlonii
Differential Revision: D16909599
fbshipit-source-id: 90252862374290dbeb7202483fa585b6a7051c12
Summary:
Need to add explicit type annotations in these areas to unblock types-first architecture for Flow. These are locations the codemod could not automatically handle.
I'll call out areas I need a close eye on in the comments.
Reviewed By: panagosg7
Differential Revision: D16659053
fbshipit-source-id: 167dd2abe093019b128676426374c1c62cf71e7f
Summary: We will need to use ES6 exports when we switch this to use the codegen'd view configs. I also need to have a named export from this file.
Reviewed By: rickhanlonii
Differential Revision: D15923789
fbshipit-source-id: 513e27834583b6d021ff06d5d7f116ccdcd27722
Summary: This diff adds the generated view config for View (in DEV)
Reviewed By: ejanzer
Differential Revision: D15780039
fbshipit-source-id: 1ec8ed1b57fd2341552746051980129848cb8e85
Summary: Rick manually created view config in JS for View; adding some missing attributes/events and using this instead of `requireNativeComponent`
Reviewed By: rickhanlonii
Differential Revision: D15488008
fbshipit-source-id: 48e925ec0ca2aeba9e6cc66edef0b70ee1c94d27
Summary:
This is the next step in moving RN towards standard path-based requires. All the requires in `Libraries` have been rewritten to use relative requires with a few exceptions, namely, `vendor` and `Renderer/oss` since those need to be changed upstream. This commit uses relative requires instead of `react-native/...` so that if Facebook were to stop syncing out certain folders and therefore remove code from the react-native package, internal code at Facebook would not need to change.
See the umbrella issue at https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/24316 for more detail.
[General] [Changed] - Migrate "Libraries" from Haste to standard path-based requires
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/24749
Differential Revision: D15258017
Pulled By: cpojer
fbshipit-source-id: a1f480ea36c05c659b6f37c8f02f6f9216d5a323
Summary: This change drops the year from the copyright headers and the LICENSE file.
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D9727774
fbshipit-source-id: df4fc1e4390733fe774b1a160dd41b4a3d83302a
Summary: Apparently different apps have different implementations of view managers that support different props. This is a problem that we will need to address. Unfortunately, this means we can't have a static config defined in JS. We will need to find another approach to this problem.
Reviewed By: sahrens
Differential Revision: D9500178
fbshipit-source-id: b591559164fcf29f5fd43e13a0f2da15011491c6
Summary: As we move these configs to JS from native, until we have codegen that ensures everything stays up to date, this adds a dev mode check to ensure they are consistent.
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D9475011
fbshipit-source-id: 9d6f7b6c649229cae569d840eda3d5f7b7aa7cb2
Summary: Moving this config to native for android so we skip the native lookup for the config.
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D9415726
fbshipit-source-id: 84cac3f0dfa4f6ea8800de77676f1e2896ee463d
Summary: Moving out the requireNativeComponent call into a new file. We want this long term for all of our view managers to support codegen of the native side and so we can move the viewConfigs into JS.
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D9231619
fbshipit-source-id: 7c89587cc6a76e92b309c4941577291e56af8c7c
Ramanpreet Nara
Andres Suarez
Gijs Weterings
Tim Yung
Micha Reiser
Emily Janzer
George Zahariev
Luna Wei
Eli White
Logan Daniels
Rick Hanlon
Emily Janzer
James Ide
glevi@fb.com
Héctor Ramos