зеркало из https://github.com/microsoft/spark.git
First cut at adding documentation for GC tuning
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
97cbd699d7
Коммит
3d2b900b08
|
@ -67,13 +67,14 @@ object you will serialize.
|
|||
Finally, if you don't register your classes, Kryo will still work, but it will have to store the
|
||||
full class name with each object, which is wasteful.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Memory Tuning
|
||||
|
||||
There are three considerations in tuning memory usage: the *amount* of memory used by your objects
|
||||
(you likely want your entire dataset to fit in memory), the *cost* of accessing those objects, and the
|
||||
overhead of *garbage collection* (if you have high turnover in terms of objects).
|
||||
|
||||
## Efficient Data Structures
|
||||
|
||||
By default, Java objects are fast to access, but can easily consume a factor of 2-5x more space
|
||||
than the "raw" data inside their fields. This is due to several reasons:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -119,11 +120,68 @@ need to trace through all your Java objects and find the unused ones. The main p
|
|||
that *the cost of garbage collection is proportional to the number of Java objects*, so using data
|
||||
structures with fewer objects (e.g. an array of `Int`s instead of a `LinkedList`) greatly reduces
|
||||
this cost. An even better method is to persist objects in serialized form, as described above: now
|
||||
there will be only *one* object (a byte array) per RDD partition. There is a lot of
|
||||
[detailed information on GC tuning](http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/gc-tuning-6-140523.html)
|
||||
available online, but at a high level, the first thing to try if GC is a problem is to use serialized caching.
|
||||
there will be only *one* object (a byte array) per RDD partition. Before trying other advanced
|
||||
techniques, the first thing to try if GC is a problem is to use serialized caching.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Cache Size Tuning
|
||||
|
||||
One of the important configuration parameters passed to Spark is the amount of memory that should be used for
|
||||
caching RDDs. By default, Spark uses 66% of the configured memory (`SPARK_MEM`) to cache RDDs. This means that
|
||||
around 33% of memory is available for any objects created during task execution.
|
||||
|
||||
In case your tasks slow down and you find that your JVM is using almost all of its allocated memory, lowering
|
||||
this value will help reducing the memory consumption. To change this to say 50%, you can call
|
||||
`System.setProperty("spark.storage.memoryFraction", "0.5")`. Combined with the use of serialized caching,
|
||||
using a smaller cache should be sufficient to mitigate most of the garbage collection problems.
|
||||
In case you are interested in further tuning the Java GC, continue reading below.
|
||||
|
||||
## GC Tuning
|
||||
|
||||
The first step in GC tuning is to collect statistics on how frequently garbage collection occurs and the amount of
|
||||
time spent GC. This can be done by adding `-verbose:gc -XX:+PrintGCDetails -XX:+PrintGCTimeStamps` to
|
||||
`SPARK_JAVA_OPTS` environment variable. Next time your Spark job is run, you will see messages printed on the
|
||||
console whenever a JVM garbage collection takes place. Note that garabage collections that occur at the executor can be
|
||||
found in the executor logs and not on the `spark-shell`.
|
||||
|
||||
Some basic information about memory management in the JVM:
|
||||
|
||||
* Java Heap space is divided in to two regions Young and Old. The Young generation is meant to hold short-lived objects
|
||||
while the Old generation is intended for objects with longer lifetimes.
|
||||
|
||||
* The Young generation is further divided into three regions [Eden, Survivor1, Survivor2].
|
||||
|
||||
* A simplified description of the garbage collection procedure: When Eden is full, a minor GC is run on Eden and objects
|
||||
that are alive from Eden and Survivor1 are copied to Survivor2. The Survivor regions are swapped. If an object is old
|
||||
enough or Survivor2 is full, it is moved to Old. Finally when Old is close to full, a full GC is invoked.
|
||||
|
||||
The goal of GC-tuning in Spark is to ensure that only long-lived RDDs are stored in the Old generation and that
|
||||
the Young generation is sufficiently sized to store short-lived objects. This will help avoid full GCs to collect
|
||||
temporary objects created during task execution. Some steps which may be useful are:
|
||||
|
||||
* Check if there are too many garbage collections by collecting GC stats. If a full GC is invoked multiple times for
|
||||
before a task completes, it means that there isn't enough memory available for executing tasks.
|
||||
|
||||
* In the GC stats that are printed, if the OldGen is close to being full, reduce the amount of memory used for caching.
|
||||
This can be done using the `spark.storage.memoryFraction` property. It is better to cache fewer objects than to slow
|
||||
down task execution !
|
||||
|
||||
* If there are too many minor collections but not too many major GCs, allocating more memory for Eden would help. You
|
||||
can approximate the size of the Eden to be an over-estimate of how much memory each task will need. If the size of Eden
|
||||
is determined to be `E`, then you can set the size of the Young generation using the option `-Xmn=4/3*E`. (The scaling
|
||||
up by 4/3 is to account for space used by survivor regions as well)
|
||||
|
||||
* As an example, if your task is reading data from HDFS, the amount of memory used by the task can be estimated using
|
||||
the size of the data block read from HDFS. Note that the size of a decompressed block is often 2 or 3 times the
|
||||
size of the block. So if we wish to have 3 or 4 tasks worth of working space, and the HDFS block size is 64 MB,
|
||||
we can estimate size of Eden to be `4*3*64MB`.
|
||||
|
||||
* Monitor how the frequency and time taken by garbage collection changes with the new settings.
|
||||
|
||||
Our experience suggests that the effect of GC tuning depends on your application and the amount of memory available.
|
||||
There are [many more tuning options](http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/gc-tuning-6-140523.html) described online,
|
||||
but at a high level, managing how frequently full GC takes place can help in reducing the overhead.
|
||||
|
||||
# Other Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
## Level of Parallelism
|
||||
|
@ -165,4 +223,4 @@ This has been a quick guide to point out the main concerns you should know about
|
|||
Spark application -- most importantly, data serialization and memory tuning. For most programs,
|
||||
switching to Kryo serialization and persisting data in serialized form will solve most common
|
||||
performance issues. Feel free to ask on the
|
||||
[Spark mailing list](http://groups.google.com/group/spark-users) about other tuning best practices.
|
||||
[Spark mailing list](http://groups.google.com/group/spark-users) about other tuning best practices.
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче