Implements isNonSimpleChar(); sort the method like the sun Class for easer merging; copy some Java documentation

This commit is contained in:
smallsql 2011-01-23 20:32:58 +00:00
Родитель b0398ffc0a
Коммит 7078903c13
1 изменённых файлов: 287 добавлений и 47 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -1,5 +1,30 @@
/*
Copyright (C) 2009, 2010 Volker Berlin (i-net software)
* Copyright 2003-2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
*
* This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
* published by the Free Software Foundation. Sun designates this
* particular file as subject to the "Classpath" exception as provided
* by Sun in the LICENSE file that accompanied this code.
*
* This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
* version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
* accompanied this code).
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
* 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
* Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
*
* Please contact Sun Microsystems, Inc., 4150 Network Circle, Santa Clara,
* CA 95054 USA or visit www.sun.com if you need additional information or
* have any questions.
*/
/*
Copyright (C) 2009 - 2011 Volker Berlin (i-net software)
This software is provided 'as-is', without any express or implied
warranty. In no event will the authors be held liable for any damages
@ -21,13 +46,10 @@
jeroen@frijters.net
*/
package sun.font;
import ikvm.awt.IkvmToolkit;
import java.awt.Font;
import java.awt.Toolkit;
import java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import java.util.Locale;
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap;
@ -37,15 +59,19 @@ import javax.swing.plaf.FontUIResource;
import cli.System.Drawing.FontFamily;
import ikvm.internal.NotYetImplementedError;
/**
*
/*
* Interface between Java Fonts (java.awt.Font) and the underlying
* font files/native font resources and the Java and native font scalers.
*/
public class FontManager{
public final class FontManager {
public static final int NO_FALLBACK = 0;
public static final int PHYSICAL_FALLBACK = 1;
public static final int LOGICAL_FALLBACK = 2;
/* deprecated, unsupported hack - actually invokes a bug! */
private static boolean usePlatformFontMetrics = false;
private static ConcurrentHashMap<String, Font2D> fontNameCache = new ConcurrentHashMap<String, Font2D>();
private static final Method getFont2D;
@ -60,7 +86,77 @@ public class FontManager{
}
}
/* Revise the implementation to in fact mean "font is a composite font.
* This ensures that Swing components will always benefit from the
* fall back fonts
*/
public static boolean fontSupportsDefaultEncoding(Font font) {
// In Java the font must be a instanceof CompositeFont
// because .NET fonts are all already Composite Fonts (I think) that we can return true
// and does not need to implements CompositeFont
return true;
}
/**
* This method is provided for internal and exclusive use by Swing.
*
* It may be used in conjunction with fontSupportsDefaultEncoding(Font)
* In the event that a desktop properties font doesn't directly
* support the default encoding, (ie because the host OS supports
* adding support for the current locale automatically for native apps),
* then Swing calls this method to get a font which uses the specified
* font for the code points it covers, but also supports this locale
* just as the standard composite fonts do.
* Note: this will over-ride any setting where an application
* specifies it prefers locale specific composite fonts.
* The logic for this, is that this method is used only where the user or
* application has specified that the native L&F be used, and that
* we should honour that request to use the same font as native apps use.
*
* The behaviour of this method is to construct a new composite
* Font object that uses the specified physical font as its first
* component, and adds all the components of "dialog" as fall back
* components.
* The method currently assumes that only the size and style attributes
* are set on the specified font. It doesn't copy the font transform or
* other attributes because they aren't set on a font created from
* the desktop. This will need to be fixed if use is broadened.
*
* Operations such as Font.deriveFont will work properly on the
* font returned by this method for deriving a different point size.
* Additionally it tries to support a different style by calling
* getNewComposite() below. That also supports replacing slot zero
* with a different physical font but that is expected to be "rare".
* Deriving with a different style is needed because its been shown
* that some applications try to do this for Swing FontUIResources.
* Also operations such as new Font(font.getFontName(..), Font.PLAIN, 14);
* will NOT yield the same result, as the new underlying CompositeFont
* cannot be "looked up" in the font registry.
* This returns a FontUIResource as that is the Font sub-class needed
* by Swing.
* Suggested usage is something like :
* FontUIResource fuir;
* Font desktopFont = getDesktopFont(..);
* // NOTE even if fontSupportsDefaultEncoding returns true because
* // you get Tahoma and are running in an English locale, you may
* // still want to just call getCompositeFontUIResource() anyway
* // as only then will you get fallback fonts - eg for CJK.
* if (FontManager.fontSupportsDefaultEncoding(desktopFont)) {
* fuir = new FontUIResource(..);
* } else {
* fuir = FontManager.getCompositeFontUIResource(desktopFont);
* }
* return fuir;
*/
public static FontUIResource getCompositeFontUIResource(Font font) {
throw new NotYetImplementedError();
}
public static Font2D getNewComposite(String family, int style, Font2D handle) {
throw new NotYetImplementedError();
}
/*
* return String representation of style prepended with "."
* This is useful for performance to avoid unnecessary string operations.
*/
@ -77,7 +173,7 @@ public class FontManager{
}
}
/**
/*
* The client supplies a name and a style.
* The name could be a family name, or a full name.
* A font may exist with the specified style, or it may
@ -110,9 +206,9 @@ public class FontManager{
return new PhysicalFont( family, style );
}
/** This method can be more efficient as it will only need to
/* This method can be more efficient as it will only need to
* do the lookup once, and subsequent calls on the java.awt.Font
* instance can utilize the cached Font2D on that object.
* instance can utilise the cached Font2D on that object.
* Its unfortunate it needs to be a native method, but the font2D
* variable has to be private.
*/
@ -124,56 +220,51 @@ public class FontManager{
}
}
public static boolean isComplexText(char[] text, int start, int limit){
/* Stuff below was in NativeFontWrapper and needed a new home */
/*
* Workaround for apps which are dependent on a font metrics bug
* in JDK 1.1. This is an unsupported win32 private setting.
*/
public static boolean usePlatformFontMetrics() {
return usePlatformFontMetrics;
}
/* This method doesn't check if alternates are selected in this app
* context. Its used by the FontMetrics caching code which in such
* a case cannot retrieve a cached metrics solely on the basis of
* the Font.equals() method since it needs to also check if the Font2D
* is the same.
* We also use non-standard composites for Swing native L&F fonts on
* Windows. In that case the policy is that the metrics reported are
* based solely on the physical font in the first slot which is the
* visible java.awt.Font. So in that case the metrics cache which tests
* the Font does what we want. In the near future when we expand the GTK
* logical font definitions we may need to revisit this if GTK reports
* combined metrics instead. For now though this test can be simple.
*/
static boolean maybeUsingAlternateCompositeFonts() {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
return false;
}
public static boolean maybeUsingAlternateCompositeFonts(){
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
return false;
}
public static boolean isNonSimpleChar(char ch){
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
return false;
}
public static boolean fontSupportsDefaultEncoding(Font f){
// In Java the font must be a instanceof CompositeFont
// because .NET fonts are all already Composite Fonts (I think) that we can return true
// and does not need to implements CompositeFont
return true;
}
public static Font getCompositeFontUIResource(Font f){
throw new NotYetImplementedError();
}
public static boolean registerFont(Font font){
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
return false;
}
public static void preferLocaleFonts(){
public static synchronized void preferLocaleFonts() {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
}
public static void preferProportionalFonts(){
public static synchronized void preferProportionalFonts() {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
}
public static boolean usePlatformFontMetrics(){
public static boolean registerFont(Font font) {
/* This method should not be called with "null".
* It is the caller's responsibility to ensure that.
*/
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
return false;
}
public static Font2D getNewComposite(Object object, int style, Font2D font2D){
throw new NotYetImplementedError();
}
/* This is called by Swing passing in a fontconfig family name
* such as "sans". In return Swing gets a FontUIResource instance
* that has queried fontconfig to resolve the font(s) used for this.
@ -195,4 +286,153 @@ public class FontManager{
return new FontUIResource( fcFamily, style, size );
}
/* The following fields and methods which relate to layout
* perhaps belong in some other class but FontManager is already
* widely used as an entry point for other JDK code that needs
* access to the font system internals.
*/
/**
* Referenced by code in the JDK which wants to test for the
* minimum char code for which layout may be required.
* Note that even basic latin text can benefit from ligatures,
* eg "ffi" but we presently apply those only if explicitly
* requested with TextAttribute.LIGATURES_ON.
* The value here indicates the lowest char code for which failing
* to invoke layout would prevent acceptable rendering.
*/
public static final int MIN_LAYOUT_CHARCODE = 0x0300;
/**
* Referenced by code in the JDK which wants to test for the
* maximum char code for which layout may be required.
* Note this does not account for supplementary characters
* where the caller interprets 'layout' to mean any case where
* one 'char' (ie the java type char) does not map to one glyph
*/
public static final int MAX_LAYOUT_CHARCODE = 0x206F;
/* If the character code falls into any of a number of unicode ranges
* where we know that simple left->right layout mapping chars to glyphs
* 1:1 and accumulating advances is going to produce incorrect results,
* we want to know this so the caller can use a more intelligent layout
* approach. A caller who cares about optimum performance may want to
* check the first case and skip the method call if its in that range.
* Although there's a lot of tests in here, knowing you can skip
* CTL saves a great deal more. The rest of the checks are ordered
* so that rather than checking explicitly if (>= start & <= end)
* which would mean all ranges would need to be checked so be sure
* CTL is not needed, the method returns as soon as it recognises
* the code point is outside of a CTL ranges.
* NOTE: Since this method accepts an 'int' it is asssumed to properly
* represent a CHARACTER. ie it assumes the caller has already
* converted surrogate pairs into supplementary characters, and so
* can handle this case and doesn't need to be told such a case is
* 'complex'.
*/
static boolean isComplexCharCode(int code) {
if (code < MIN_LAYOUT_CHARCODE || code > MAX_LAYOUT_CHARCODE) {
return false;
}
else if (code <= 0x036f) {
// Trigger layout for combining diacriticals 0x0300->0x036f
return true;
}
else if (code < 0x0590) {
// No automatic layout for Greek, Cyrillic, Armenian.
return false;
}
else if (code <= 0x06ff) {
// Hebrew 0590 - 05ff
// Arabic 0600 - 06ff
return true;
}
else if (code < 0x0900) {
return false; // Syriac and Thaana
}
else if (code <= 0x0e7f) {
// if Indic, assume shaping for conjuncts, reordering:
// 0900 - 097F Devanagari
// 0980 - 09FF Bengali
// 0A00 - 0A7F Gurmukhi
// 0A80 - 0AFF Gujarati
// 0B00 - 0B7F Oriya
// 0B80 - 0BFF Tamil
// 0C00 - 0C7F Telugu
// 0C80 - 0CFF Kannada
// 0D00 - 0D7F Malayalam
// 0D80 - 0DFF Sinhala
// 0E00 - 0E7F if Thai, assume shaping for vowel, tone marks
return true;
}
else if (code < 0x1780) {
return false;
}
else if (code <= 0x17ff) { // 1780 - 17FF Khmer
return true;
}
else if (code < 0x200c) {
return false;
}
else if (code <= 0x200d) { // zwj or zwnj
return true;
}
else if (code >= 0x202a && code <= 0x202e) { // directional control
return true;
}
else if (code >= 0x206a && code <= 0x206f) { // directional control
return true;
}
return false;
}
/* This is almost the same as the method above, except it takes a
* char which means it may include undecoded surrogate pairs.
* The distinction is made so that code which needs to identify all
* cases in which we do not have a simple mapping from
* char->unicode character->glyph can be be identified.
* For example measurement cannot simply sum advances of 'chars',
* the caret in editable text cannot advance one 'char' at a time, etc.
* These callers really are asking for more than whether 'layout'
* needs to be run, they need to know if they can assume 1->1
* char->glyph mapping.
*/
static boolean isNonSimpleChar(char ch) {
return
isComplexCharCode(ch) ||
(ch >= CharToGlyphMapper.HI_SURROGATE_START &&
ch <= CharToGlyphMapper.LO_SURROGATE_END);
}
/**
* If there is anything in the text which triggers a case
* where char->glyph does not map 1:1 in straightforward
* left->right ordering, then this method returns true.
* Scripts which might require it but are not treated as such
* due to JDK implementations will not return true.
* ie a 'true' return is an indication of the treatment by
* the implementation.
* Whether supplementary characters should be considered is dependent
* on the needs of the caller. Since this method accepts the 'char' type
* then such chars are always represented by a pair. From a rendering
* perspective these will all (in the cases I know of) still be one
* unicode character -> one glyph. But if a caller is using this to
* discover any case where it cannot make naive assumptions about
* the number of chars, and how to index through them, then it may
* need the option to have a 'true' return in such a case.
*/
public static boolean isComplexText(char [] chs, int start, int limit) {
for (int i = start; i < limit; i++) {
if (chs[i] < MIN_LAYOUT_CHARCODE) {
continue;
}
else if (isNonSimpleChar(chs[i])) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
}