[Mono-osx] which framework to choose?

Duane Wandless duane at wandless.net
Tue Sep 14 16:20:35 EDT 2010


We have been using mobjc/mcocoa.  Not sure about the PowerPC support.  But I
found mobjc to have a smaller memory footprint than monobjc.

I'm helping by contributing to the effort to make MonoMac more stable.

Duane

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Natalia Portillo <claunia at claunia.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm more or less in the same situation.
>
> Cocoa# is abandoned, and MonoMac is not yet stable.
> However I decided not to use Monoobjc as it does not work at all on
> PowerPC, and there is still market for it.
>
> Regards,
> Natalia Portillo
>
> El 14/09/2010, a las 06:44, Sebastian P.R. Gingter escribió:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm not quite sure what framework to pick now when developing for OS X.
> > I know of Cocoa#, Monobjc and now MonoMac.
> > All are different approaches to bringing the cocoa API to the .NET / Mono
> world.
> > But which one is the way to go?
> >
> > I already learned that several dropped cocoa# and switched to Monobjc.
> but what about MonoMac? That seems quite new and seems to be based in
> MonoTouch.
> >
> > So what is the 'official' Mono way of doing Mac applications?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >  Sebastian
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mono-osx mailing list
> > Mono-osx at lists.ximian.com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-osx
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-osx mailing list
> Mono-osx at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-osx
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-osx/attachments/20100914/f8377267/attachment.html 


More information about the Mono-osx mailing list