mail-archives/gtk-sharp-list/2005-June/006048.html

93 строки
3.8 KiB
HTML

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Gtk-sharp-list] GTK# Vs. System.Windows.Forms (Want reasons
as to why GTK# is better)
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:gtk-sharp-list%40lists.ximian.com?Subject=%5BGtk-sharp-list%5D%20GTK%23%20Vs.%20System.Windows.Forms%20%28Want%20reasons%0A%09as%20to%20why%20GTK%23%20is%20better%29&In-Reply-To=42A8BA20.6070606%40gmail.com">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="006047.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="005974.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Gtk-sharp-list] GTK# Vs. System.Windows.Forms (Want reasons
as to why GTK# is better)</H1>
<B>Miguel de Icaza</B>
<A HREF="mailto:gtk-sharp-list%40lists.ximian.com?Subject=%5BGtk-sharp-list%5D%20GTK%23%20Vs.%20System.Windows.Forms%20%28Want%20reasons%0A%09as%20to%20why%20GTK%23%20is%20better%29&In-Reply-To=42A8BA20.6070606%40gmail.com"
TITLE="[Gtk-sharp-list] GTK# Vs. System.Windows.Forms (Want reasons
as to why GTK# is better)">miguel at ximian.com
</A><BR>
<I>Sun Jun 26 15:58:57 EDT 2005</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006047.html">[Gtk-sharp-list] GTK# Vs. System.Windows.Forms (Want reasons as
to why GTK# is better)
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="005974.html">[Gtk-sharp-list] Creating Rsvg.Pixbuf from a Stream AtSize
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#6048">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#6048">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#6048">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#6048">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Hello,
&gt;<i> I'm trying to convince a project-manager as to why I should keep
</I>&gt;<i> working on GTK# as the UI rather than System.Windows.Forms.
</I>&gt;<i> The project is a GUI for a C# BitTorrent client library [it intends
</I>&gt;<i> to have mutliple-torrents, easy sharing, easy searching via RSS Feeds].
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> The main kill is the additional 5MB dependency to a &lt; 1 MB set [at
</I>&gt;<i> most, since its all in .Net and tends to be small]. (if its possible
</I>&gt;<i> to shrink down that size, that'd be great.. I'll try compressing all
</I>&gt;<i> the native libaries with UPX and trimming language stuff out.)
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> I've been trying to think up solid reasons as to why GTK# is better,
</I>&gt;<i> but since S.W.F. is plowing ahead in Mono... cross-platform is
</I>&gt;<i> lozing its ground in that matter.
</I>
You might want to read:
<A HREF="http://mono-project.com/Gui_Toolkits">http://mono-project.com/Gui_Toolkits</A>
In addition, for Linux deployment, here are a few extras:
* You get accessibility (and external scriptability through it).
* It is more mature, S.W.F is making a lot of progress, but will
take some time to mature.
Your manager is right in that the download against S.W.F will be
smaller.
Miguel.
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006047.html">[Gtk-sharp-list] GTK# Vs. System.Windows.Forms (Want reasons as
to why GTK# is better)
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="005974.html">[Gtk-sharp-list] Creating Rsvg.Pixbuf from a Stream AtSize
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#6048">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#6048">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#6048">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#6048">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gtk-sharp-list">More information about the Gtk-sharp-list
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>