mail-archives/mono-bugs/2004-June/016863.html

74 строки
3.1 KiB
HTML

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mono-bugs] [Bug 58234][Nor] Changed - FileSystemWatcher does not seem to work
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:bugzilla-daemon%40bugzilla.ximian.com">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016860.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="016862.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mono-bugs] [Bug 58234][Nor] Changed - FileSystemWatcher does not seem to work
</H1>
<B>bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com
</B>
<A HREF="mailto:bugzilla-daemon%40bugzilla.ximian.com"
TITLE="[Mono-bugs] [Bug 58234][Nor] Changed - FileSystemWatcher does not seem to work">bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com
</A><BR>
<I>Sun, 6 Jun 2004 16:52:39 -0400 (EDT)</I>
<P><UL>
<LI> Previous message: <A HREF="016860.html">[Mono-bugs] [Bug 58332][Cri] Changed - spec file to rebuild rpms fails on Fedora FC1
</A></li>
<LI> Next message: <A HREF="016862.html">[Mono-bugs] [Bug 58539][Wis] Changed - No RPM for mod_mono for fedora core 1
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16863">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16863">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16863">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16863">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by <A HREF="mailto:gonzalo@ximian.com.">gonzalo@ximian.com.</A>
<A HREF="http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=58234">http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=58234</A>
--- shadow/58234 2004-06-06 15:59:40.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/58234.tmp.31675 2004-06-06 16:52:39.000000000 -0400
@@ -77,6 +77,10 @@
dirs with a large number of subdirs it doesn't work. I've got a dir
here with 104 subdirs and it only picks up changes in the main dir.
A few years ago there was a bug in gnome-vfs: there was only a certain
number of dirs that could be monitored by the fam backend. I don't
know the details, but perhaps something similar is going on here?
+
+------- Additional Comments From <A HREF="mailto:gonzalo@ximian.com">gonzalo@ximian.com</A> 2004-06-06 16:52 -------
+It might be FAM, yes. Can you try exporting MONO_MANAGED_WATCHER=1 and
+runnning your test?
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI> Previous message: <A HREF="016860.html">[Mono-bugs] [Bug 58332][Cri] Changed - spec file to rebuild rpms fails on Fedora FC1
</A></li>
<LI> Next message: <A HREF="016862.html">[Mono-bugs] [Bug 58539][Wis] Changed - No RPM for mod_mono for fedora core 1
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16863">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16863">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16863">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16863">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
</body></html>