mail-archives/mono-bugs/2004-June/017905.html

77 строки
3.2 KiB
HTML

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mono-bugs] [Bug 56038][Nor] Changed - Memory leak in the outputcache of a page.
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:bugzilla-daemon%40bugzilla.ximian.com">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="017904.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="017906.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mono-bugs] [Bug 56038][Nor] Changed - Memory leak in the outputcache of a page.
</H1>
<B>bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com
</B>
<A HREF="mailto:bugzilla-daemon%40bugzilla.ximian.com"
TITLE="[Mono-bugs] [Bug 56038][Nor] Changed - Memory leak in the outputcache of a page.">bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com
</A><BR>
<I>Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:51:01 -0400 (EDT)</I>
<P><UL>
<LI> Previous message: <A HREF="017904.html">[Mono-bugs] [Bug 60445][Wis] Changed - mod-mono-server/mod_mono can't display more than one webapplication.
</A></li>
<LI> Next message: <A HREF="017906.html">[Mono-bugs] [Bug 60478][Wis] Changed - XSP doesn't shows correct links with non-root webapplications
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#17905">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#17905">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#17905">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#17905">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by <A HREF="mailto:patrik.torstensson@intel.com.">patrik.torstensson@intel.com.</A>
<A HREF="http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=56038">http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=56038</A>
--- shadow/56038 2004-06-23 15:44:09.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/56038.tmp.17486 2004-06-23 16:51:01.000000000 -0400
@@ -85,6 +85,13 @@
VP:id=2
System.Web.Caching.CachedRawResponse Expired
removed: CachedRawResponse
So the &quot;leak&quot; is not because old data is not being disposed, but
because new data is inserted more quickly than removed.
+
+------- Additional Comments From <A HREF="mailto:Patrik.Torstensson@intel.com">Patrik.Torstensson@intel.com</A> 2004-06-23 16:51 -------
+Remember also that I fixed the cache disposal algorithm, items was
+moved into wrong buckets etc.
+
+therefore I think the current cache works a lot better.. even in the
+extreme case that the test shows.
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI> Previous message: <A HREF="017904.html">[Mono-bugs] [Bug 60445][Wis] Changed - mod-mono-server/mod_mono can't display more than one webapplication.
</A></li>
<LI> Next message: <A HREF="017906.html">[Mono-bugs] [Bug 60478][Wis] Changed - XSP doesn't shows correct links with non-root webapplications
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#17905">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#17905">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#17905">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#17905">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
</body></html>