зеркало из https://github.com/mono/mail-archives.git
86 строки
3.2 KiB
HTML
86 строки
3.2 KiB
HTML
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
|
|
<HTML>
|
|
<HEAD>
|
|
<TITLE> [Mono-list] Re: [DotGNU]Re: Collaboration on alternatives to the
|
|
US-patent-endangered APIs?
|
|
</TITLE>
|
|
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
|
|
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:rweather%40zip.com.au">
|
|
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
|
|
|
|
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016304.html">
|
|
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="016315.html">
|
|
</HEAD>
|
|
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
|
|
<H1>[Mono-list] Re: [DotGNU]Re: Collaboration on alternatives to the
|
|
US-patent-endangered APIs?
|
|
</H1>
|
|
<B>Rhys Weatherley
|
|
</B>
|
|
<A HREF="mailto:rweather%40zip.com.au"
|
|
TITLE="[Mono-list] Re: [DotGNU]Re: Collaboration on alternatives to the
|
|
US-patent-endangered APIs?">rweather@zip.com.au
|
|
</A><BR>
|
|
<I>Sun, 12 Oct 2003 09:17:22 +1000</I>
|
|
<P><UL>
|
|
<LI> Previous message: <A HREF="016304.html">[Mono-list] RE: [DotGNU]Re: Collaboration on alternatives to the
|
|
US-patent-endangered APIs?
|
|
</A></li>
|
|
<LI> Next message: <A HREF="016315.html">[Mono-list] RE: [DotGNU]Re: Collaboration on alternatives to the
|
|
US-patent-endangered APIs?
|
|
</A></li>
|
|
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
|
|
<a href="date.html#16308">[ date ]</a>
|
|
<a href="thread.html#16308">[ thread ]</a>
|
|
<a href="subject.html#16308">[ subject ]</a>
|
|
<a href="author.html#16308">[ author ]</a>
|
|
</LI>
|
|
</UL>
|
|
<HR>
|
|
<!--beginarticle-->
|
|
<PRE>On Sunday 12 October 2003 06:47 am, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
|
|
|
|
><i> But being selective about what you consider to be
|
|
</I>><i> thin-wrapper, and what you don't is just an exercise in deception.
|
|
</I>
|
|
That's out of line and you should apologise. It was based on a careful
|
|
analysis of the API's and other similar API's in the past (MFC of 10 years
|
|
ago does everything that you listed as "massive departures").
|
|
|
|
In any case, it has already been made clear in this thread that we are hedging
|
|
our bets: we'll switch to Qt# or Gtk# in a heartbeat should Microsoft
|
|
disagree with our analysis. What? We can't have it both ways?
|
|
|
|
If you have no interest in co-operating with us in a productive and
|
|
non-hostile fashion, why don't you just say so? Attacking our judgement is
|
|
hardly conducive to a productive working relationship.
|
|
|
|
I suspect that the real problem here is that you desperately don't want
|
|
Windows.Forms to succeed (either Mono's or pnet's). Because who in the world
|
|
would use Gtk# if Windows.Forms applications worked everywhere?
|
|
|
|
Cheers,
|
|
|
|
Rhys.
|
|
|
|
|
|
</PRE>
|
|
<!--endarticle-->
|
|
<HR>
|
|
<P><UL>
|
|
<!--threads-->
|
|
<LI> Previous message: <A HREF="016304.html">[Mono-list] RE: [DotGNU]Re: Collaboration on alternatives to the
|
|
US-patent-endangered APIs?
|
|
</A></li>
|
|
<LI> Next message: <A HREF="016315.html">[Mono-list] RE: [DotGNU]Re: Collaboration on alternatives to the
|
|
US-patent-endangered APIs?
|
|
</A></li>
|
|
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
|
|
<a href="date.html#16308">[ date ]</a>
|
|
<a href="thread.html#16308">[ thread ]</a>
|
|
<a href="subject.html#16308">[ subject ]</a>
|
|
<a href="author.html#16308">[ author ]</a>
|
|
</LI>
|
|
</UL>
|
|
</body></html>
|