mail-archives/mono-list/2003-October/016309.html

114 строки
4.7 KiB
HTML

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mono-list] Re: [DotGNU]Re: Collaboration on alternatives to the
US-patent-endangered APIs?
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:miguel%40ximian.com">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016312.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="016314.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mono-list] Re: [DotGNU]Re: Collaboration on alternatives to the
US-patent-endangered APIs?
</H1>
<B>Miguel de Icaza
</B>
<A HREF="mailto:miguel%40ximian.com"
TITLE="[Mono-list] Re: [DotGNU]Re: Collaboration on alternatives to the
US-patent-endangered APIs?">miguel@ximian.com
</A><BR>
<I>11 Oct 2003 22:11:39 -0400</I>
<P><UL>
<LI> Previous message: <A HREF="016312.html">[Mono-list] Asp.Net Security Analyser
</A></li>
<LI> Next message: <A HREF="016314.html">[Mono-list] Re: [DotGNU]Re: Collaboration on alternatives to the
US-patent-endangered APIs?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16309">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16309">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16309">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16309">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Hello,
&gt;<i> &gt; If you did such a careful study with your lawyer, would you mind
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; publishing it so others can review it?
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> And I suppose you would just turn over internal Ximian/Novell legal advice and
</I>&gt;<i> developer discussions should I ask for it? Nice try to avoid the apology.
</I>
Rhys, I am not the one making claims that `Windows.Forms has no patent
violations', you are the one who claimed that you had done a careful
study.
What I said is reflected on our FAQ: we dont believe that *any* of it is
patentable. But if you are going to pick `Windows.Forms' as part of
your initiative of &quot;apis which are absolutely not encumbered by a
patent&quot;, then I believe that Norbert is miss-leading the community and
it can not be the basis of a completely pure effort to have a
non-encumbered system.
You claim that you did a careful study on Windows.Forms and its
applicability to the patent, and that is why its excluded. I do not
believe either you or Norbert did any careful study.
For us to cooperate in this delicate matter, I must trust you, and so
far you are not giving me any sense of security. If anything, you are
avoiding the topic, just like Darl McBride is.
&gt;<i> Anyway, from the USPTO's guidelines on patentability [1]:
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> The subject matter sought to be patented must be sufficiently different
</I>&gt;<i> from what has been used or described before that it may be said to be
</I>&gt;<i> nonobvious to a person having ordinary skill in the area of technology
</I>&gt;<i> related to the invention. For example, the substitution of one material
</I>&gt;<i> for another, or changes in size, are ordinarily not patentable.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> The last sentence is the important one: &quot;the substitution of one material for
</I>&gt;<i> another&quot;. Changing C++ in MFC into C# in Windows.Forms would seem to be
</I>&gt;<i> little more than a change in &quot;material&quot;.
</I>
An excellent quote, worth keeping it around.
&gt;<i> Of course, we could be wrong - anything could happen once the C&amp;D's start
</I>&gt;<i> flying. Hence the hedge-betting on Qt# and Gtk#.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> I (still) await your apology. Accusing us of being deceptive, and then asking
</I>&gt;<i> that we prove your own accusation, is quite offensive. And needless to say,
</I>&gt;<i> uncooperative.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> Cheers,
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> Rhys.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> [1] <A HREF="http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/doc/general/index.html#novelty">http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/doc/general/index.html#novelty</A>
</I>--
Miguel de Icaza &lt;<A HREF="mailto:miguel@ximian.com">miguel@ximian.com</A>&gt;
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI> Previous message: <A HREF="016312.html">[Mono-list] Asp.Net Security Analyser
</A></li>
<LI> Next message: <A HREF="016314.html">[Mono-list] Re: [DotGNU]Re: Collaboration on alternatives to the
US-patent-endangered APIs?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16309">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16309">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16309">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16309">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
</body></html>