зеркало из https://github.com/mono/mail-archives.git
101 строка
3.2 KiB
HTML
101 строка
3.2 KiB
HTML
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
|
|
<HTML>
|
|
<HEAD>
|
|
<TITLE> [Mono-list] Binaries naming
|
|
</TITLE>
|
|
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
|
|
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:asierllano%40infonegocio.com">
|
|
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
|
|
|
|
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016386.html">
|
|
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="016401.html">
|
|
</HEAD>
|
|
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
|
|
<H1>[Mono-list] Binaries naming
|
|
</H1>
|
|
<B>Asier Llano Palacios
|
|
</B>
|
|
<A HREF="mailto:asierllano%40infonegocio.com"
|
|
TITLE="[Mono-list] Binaries naming">asierllano@infonegocio.com
|
|
</A><BR>
|
|
<I>Tue, 14 Oct 2003 13:12:33 +0200</I>
|
|
<P><UL>
|
|
<LI> Previous message: <A HREF="016386.html">[Mono-list] Dispose() method in the UdpClient class
|
|
</A></li>
|
|
<LI> Next message: <A HREF="016401.html">[Mono-list] Binaries naming
|
|
</A></li>
|
|
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
|
|
<a href="date.html#16392">[ date ]</a>
|
|
<a href="thread.html#16392">[ thread ]</a>
|
|
<a href="subject.html#16392">[ subject ]</a>
|
|
<a href="author.html#16392">[ author ]</a>
|
|
</LI>
|
|
</UL>
|
|
<HR>
|
|
<!--beginarticle-->
|
|
<PRE>Hello,
|
|
|
|
I've bin thinking about the names of the executables and found the following
|
|
two cosmetic problems.
|
|
|
|
a) Unconsistent naming, some of the including an 'm' at the beginning, some
|
|
of them 'mono' and some of them nothing at all.
|
|
mcs: for the compiler
|
|
mono: for the jit
|
|
mint: for the interpreter
|
|
ilasm: for the assembler
|
|
monodis: for the disassembler
|
|
monodoc: for the documentation
|
|
....
|
|
|
|
b) Distributions make pnet and mono block each other just because of sharing
|
|
the name of 'ilasm'. Although I'm not a fan of pnet it is a pity to block
|
|
each other for sharing just the name of one executable.
|
|
|
|
c) Windows people ask for tools that already exist, because they don't know
|
|
the mono's name of the same tool. (I was thinking about a mail asking for
|
|
the disassembler).
|
|
|
|
I know that it would be a little change in source, but a big change in the
|
|
documentation, in the working of the people and packaging. But, I was
|
|
thinking that if the change is proposed, the sooner, the better.
|
|
(Once Mono 1.0 is released, it is clearly too late).
|
|
|
|
Just I was thinking that it would be better if for Mono 1.0 the executables
|
|
would be called:
|
|
mcsc: for the compiler
|
|
mjit: for the jit
|
|
mint: for the interpreter
|
|
milasm: for the assembler
|
|
mdoc: for the documentation
|
|
....
|
|
|
|
I think it would make everything more consistent and easier for people to
|
|
start working with mono.
|
|
Don't you think it would look as a more organized framework?
|
|
|
|
I know it would be a hard job, so don't blame me just for thinking. I'm open
|
|
to hear your thoughts.
|
|
|
|
Asier Llano
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
</PRE>
|
|
<!--endarticle-->
|
|
<HR>
|
|
<P><UL>
|
|
<!--threads-->
|
|
<LI> Previous message: <A HREF="016386.html">[Mono-list] Dispose() method in the UdpClient class
|
|
</A></li>
|
|
<LI> Next message: <A HREF="016401.html">[Mono-list] Binaries naming
|
|
</A></li>
|
|
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
|
|
<a href="date.html#16392">[ date ]</a>
|
|
<a href="thread.html#16392">[ thread ]</a>
|
|
<a href="subject.html#16392">[ subject ]</a>
|
|
<a href="author.html#16392">[ author ]</a>
|
|
</LI>
|
|
</UL>
|
|
</body></html>
|