gecko-dev/dom/base/DOMQuad.cpp

136 строки
3.5 KiB
C++
Исходник Обычный вид История

/* -*- Mode: C++; tab-width: 8; indent-tabs-mode: nil; c-basic-offset: 2 -*- */
/* vim: set ts=8 sts=2 et sw=2 tw=80: */
/* This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
* License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
* file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. */
#include "mozilla/dom/DOMQuad.h"
#include "mozilla/dom/DOMQuadBinding.h"
#include "mozilla/dom/DOMPoint.h"
#include "mozilla/dom/DOMRect.h"
#include <algorithm>
using namespace mozilla;
using namespace mozilla::dom;
using namespace mozilla::gfx;
NS_IMPL_CYCLE_COLLECTION_WRAPPERCACHE(DOMQuad, mParent, mBounds, mPoints[0],
mPoints[1], mPoints[2], mPoints[3])
NS_IMPL_CYCLE_COLLECTION_ROOT_NATIVE(DOMQuad, AddRef)
NS_IMPL_CYCLE_COLLECTION_UNROOT_NATIVE(DOMQuad, Release)
DOMQuad::DOMQuad(nsISupports* aParent, CSSPoint aPoints[4])
: mParent(aParent)
{
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
mPoints[i] = new DOMPoint(aParent, aPoints[i].x, aPoints[i].y);
}
}
DOMQuad::DOMQuad(nsISupports* aParent)
: mParent(aParent)
{
}
DOMQuad::~DOMQuad()
{
}
JSObject*
Bug 1117172 part 3. Change the wrappercached WrapObject methods to allow passing in aGivenProto. r=peterv The only manual changes here are to BindingUtils.h, BindingUtils.cpp, Codegen.py, Element.cpp, IDBFileRequest.cpp, IDBObjectStore.cpp, dom/workers/Navigator.cpp, WorkerPrivate.cpp, DeviceStorageRequestChild.cpp, Notification.cpp, nsGlobalWindow.cpp, MessagePort.cpp, nsJSEnvironment.cpp, Sandbox.cpp, XPCConvert.cpp, ExportHelpers.cpp, and DataStoreService.cpp. The rest of this diff was generated by running the following commands: find . -name "*.h" -o -name "*.cpp" | xargs perl -pi -e 'BEGIN { $/ = undef } s/(WrapObjectInternal\(JSContext *\* *(?:aCx|cx|aContext|aCtx|js))\)/\1, JS::Handle<JSObject*> aGivenProto)/g' find . -name "*.h" -o -name "*.cpp" | xargs perl -pi -e 'BEGIN { $/ = undef } s/(WrapObjectInternal\((?:aCx|cx|aContext|aCtx|js))\)/\1, aGivenProto)/g' find . -name "*.h" -o -name "*.cpp" | xargs perl -pi -e 'BEGIN { $/ = undef } s/(WrapNode\(JSContext *\* *(?:aCx|cx|aContext|aCtx|js))\)/\1, JS::Handle<JSObject*> aGivenProto)/g' find . -name "*.h" -o -name "*.cpp" | xargs perl -pi -e 'BEGIN { $/ = undef } s/(WrapNode\((?:aCx|cx|aContext|aCtx|js))\)/\1, aGivenProto)/g' find . -name "*.h" -o -name "*.cpp" | xargs perl -pi -e 'BEGIN { $/ = undef } s/(WrapObject\(JSContext *\* *(?:aCx|cx|aContext|aCtx|js))\)/\1, JS::Handle<JSObject*> aGivenProto)/g' find . -name "*.h" -o -name "*.cpp" | xargs perl -pi -e 'BEGIN { $/ = undef } s/(Binding(?:_workers)?::Wrap\((?:aCx|cx|aContext|aCtx|js), [^,)]+)\)/\1, aGivenProto)/g'
2015-03-19 17:13:33 +03:00
DOMQuad::WrapObject(JSContext* aCx, JS::Handle<JSObject*> aGivenProto)
{
return DOMQuad_Binding::Wrap(aCx, this, aGivenProto);
}
already_AddRefed<DOMQuad>
DOMQuad::Constructor(const GlobalObject& aGlobal,
const DOMPointInit& aP1,
const DOMPointInit& aP2,
const DOMPointInit& aP3,
const DOMPointInit& aP4,
ErrorResult& aRV)
{
Bug 1207245 - part 6 - rename nsRefPtr<T> to RefPtr<T>; r=ehsan; a=Tomcat The bulk of this commit was generated with a script, executed at the top level of a typical source code checkout. The only non-machine-generated part was modifying MFBT's moz.build to reflect the new naming. CLOSED TREE makes big refactorings like this a piece of cake. # The main substitution. find . -name '*.cpp' -o -name '*.cc' -o -name '*.h' -o -name '*.mm' -o -name '*.idl'| \ xargs perl -p -i -e ' s/nsRefPtr\.h/RefPtr\.h/g; # handle includes s/nsRefPtr ?</RefPtr</g; # handle declarations and variables ' # Handle a special friend declaration in gfx/layers/AtomicRefCountedWithFinalize.h. perl -p -i -e 's/::nsRefPtr;/::RefPtr;/' gfx/layers/AtomicRefCountedWithFinalize.h # Handle nsRefPtr.h itself, a couple places that define constructors # from nsRefPtr, and code generators specially. We do this here, rather # than indiscriminantly s/nsRefPtr/RefPtr/, because that would rename # things like nsRefPtrHashtable. perl -p -i -e 's/nsRefPtr/RefPtr/g' \ mfbt/nsRefPtr.h \ xpcom/glue/nsCOMPtr.h \ xpcom/base/OwningNonNull.h \ ipc/ipdl/ipdl/lower.py \ ipc/ipdl/ipdl/builtin.py \ dom/bindings/Codegen.py \ python/lldbutils/lldbutils/utils.py # In our indiscriminate substitution above, we renamed # nsRefPtrGetterAddRefs, the class behind getter_AddRefs. Fix that up. find . -name '*.cpp' -o -name '*.h' -o -name '*.idl' | \ xargs perl -p -i -e 's/nsRefPtrGetterAddRefs/RefPtrGetterAddRefs/g' if [ -d .git ]; then git mv mfbt/nsRefPtr.h mfbt/RefPtr.h else hg mv mfbt/nsRefPtr.h mfbt/RefPtr.h fi --HG-- rename : mfbt/nsRefPtr.h => mfbt/RefPtr.h
2015-10-18 08:24:48 +03:00
RefPtr<DOMQuad> obj = new DOMQuad(aGlobal.GetAsSupports());
Bug 1186265 - Partially update DOMPoint, DOMQuad, DOMRect, DOMMatrix. r=bz Some notes: this does not fully bring us to compliance to the current spec. Instead, these are the fixes that I needed to make in order to make css/geometry/interfaces.html pass with the DOMPoint changes in the previous patches. I don't fully understand why that patch caused the test to fail the way it did, but it ended up being easier to fix our code than understand why the harness was falling over. The DOMQuad::QuadBounds class was the source of some confusion for me. Now that DOMRectReadOnly is a concrete class with members, I wanted to avoid wasting them. However, the spec is unclear as to whether a DOMQuad's bound's should be live -- that is because DOMQuad exposes DOMPoint, we can set its points after retrieving a QuadBounds object. Our current code is live, setting the points changes the QuadBounds. Chromium's current behavior is to never update the QuadBounds object. I've left our behavior untouched in this patch (and waste 4 doubles per QuadBounds object), but I am intending to file a bug to understand what the intent of the spec is. I wonder if the author intended the points to be DOMPointReadOnly instead. If so, we could simplify the DOMRectReadOnly code and get rid of the virtual getters, which would be nice. I also wasn't thrilled to put the DOMMatrix setters on the DOMMatrixReadOnly class, but for brevity and simplicity of implementation, I've made them public. I briefly considered making the setters protected on the ReadOnly version of the class, but I'm not convinced that having to explicitly make them public on the derived class is worth the extra copies of the names. MozReview-Commit-ID: CjdW4Nbnc6A --HG-- extra : rebase_source : 44489693afebff571a415b487e29fa6153288421
2018-03-30 02:19:31 +03:00
obj->mPoints[0] = DOMPoint::FromPoint(aGlobal, aP1);
obj->mPoints[1] = DOMPoint::FromPoint(aGlobal, aP2);
obj->mPoints[2] = DOMPoint::FromPoint(aGlobal, aP3);
obj->mPoints[3] = DOMPoint::FromPoint(aGlobal, aP4);
return obj.forget();
}
already_AddRefed<DOMQuad>
DOMQuad::Constructor(const GlobalObject& aGlobal, const DOMRectReadOnly& aRect,
ErrorResult& aRV)
{
CSSPoint points[4];
Float x = aRect.X(), y = aRect.Y(), w = aRect.Width(), h = aRect.Height();
points[0] = CSSPoint(x, y);
points[1] = CSSPoint(x + w, y);
points[2] = CSSPoint(x + w, y + h);
points[3] = CSSPoint(x, y + h);
Bug 1207245 - part 6 - rename nsRefPtr<T> to RefPtr<T>; r=ehsan; a=Tomcat The bulk of this commit was generated with a script, executed at the top level of a typical source code checkout. The only non-machine-generated part was modifying MFBT's moz.build to reflect the new naming. CLOSED TREE makes big refactorings like this a piece of cake. # The main substitution. find . -name '*.cpp' -o -name '*.cc' -o -name '*.h' -o -name '*.mm' -o -name '*.idl'| \ xargs perl -p -i -e ' s/nsRefPtr\.h/RefPtr\.h/g; # handle includes s/nsRefPtr ?</RefPtr</g; # handle declarations and variables ' # Handle a special friend declaration in gfx/layers/AtomicRefCountedWithFinalize.h. perl -p -i -e 's/::nsRefPtr;/::RefPtr;/' gfx/layers/AtomicRefCountedWithFinalize.h # Handle nsRefPtr.h itself, a couple places that define constructors # from nsRefPtr, and code generators specially. We do this here, rather # than indiscriminantly s/nsRefPtr/RefPtr/, because that would rename # things like nsRefPtrHashtable. perl -p -i -e 's/nsRefPtr/RefPtr/g' \ mfbt/nsRefPtr.h \ xpcom/glue/nsCOMPtr.h \ xpcom/base/OwningNonNull.h \ ipc/ipdl/ipdl/lower.py \ ipc/ipdl/ipdl/builtin.py \ dom/bindings/Codegen.py \ python/lldbutils/lldbutils/utils.py # In our indiscriminate substitution above, we renamed # nsRefPtrGetterAddRefs, the class behind getter_AddRefs. Fix that up. find . -name '*.cpp' -o -name '*.h' -o -name '*.idl' | \ xargs perl -p -i -e 's/nsRefPtrGetterAddRefs/RefPtrGetterAddRefs/g' if [ -d .git ]; then git mv mfbt/nsRefPtr.h mfbt/RefPtr.h else hg mv mfbt/nsRefPtr.h mfbt/RefPtr.h fi --HG-- rename : mfbt/nsRefPtr.h => mfbt/RefPtr.h
2015-10-18 08:24:48 +03:00
RefPtr<DOMQuad> obj = new DOMQuad(aGlobal.GetAsSupports(), points);
return obj.forget();
}
Bug 1186265 - Partially update DOMPoint, DOMQuad, DOMRect, DOMMatrix. r=bz Some notes: this does not fully bring us to compliance to the current spec. Instead, these are the fixes that I needed to make in order to make css/geometry/interfaces.html pass with the DOMPoint changes in the previous patches. I don't fully understand why that patch caused the test to fail the way it did, but it ended up being easier to fix our code than understand why the harness was falling over. The DOMQuad::QuadBounds class was the source of some confusion for me. Now that DOMRectReadOnly is a concrete class with members, I wanted to avoid wasting them. However, the spec is unclear as to whether a DOMQuad's bound's should be live -- that is because DOMQuad exposes DOMPoint, we can set its points after retrieving a QuadBounds object. Our current code is live, setting the points changes the QuadBounds. Chromium's current behavior is to never update the QuadBounds object. I've left our behavior untouched in this patch (and waste 4 doubles per QuadBounds object), but I am intending to file a bug to understand what the intent of the spec is. I wonder if the author intended the points to be DOMPointReadOnly instead. If so, we could simplify the DOMRectReadOnly code and get rid of the virtual getters, which would be nice. I also wasn't thrilled to put the DOMMatrix setters on the DOMMatrixReadOnly class, but for brevity and simplicity of implementation, I've made them public. I briefly considered making the setters protected on the ReadOnly version of the class, but I'm not convinced that having to explicitly make them public on the derived class is worth the extra copies of the names. MozReview-Commit-ID: CjdW4Nbnc6A --HG-- extra : rebase_source : 44489693afebff571a415b487e29fa6153288421
2018-03-30 02:19:31 +03:00
void
DOMQuad::GetHorizontalMinMax(double* aX1, double* aX2) const
{
Bug 1186265 - Partially update DOMPoint, DOMQuad, DOMRect, DOMMatrix. r=bz Some notes: this does not fully bring us to compliance to the current spec. Instead, these are the fixes that I needed to make in order to make css/geometry/interfaces.html pass with the DOMPoint changes in the previous patches. I don't fully understand why that patch caused the test to fail the way it did, but it ended up being easier to fix our code than understand why the harness was falling over. The DOMQuad::QuadBounds class was the source of some confusion for me. Now that DOMRectReadOnly is a concrete class with members, I wanted to avoid wasting them. However, the spec is unclear as to whether a DOMQuad's bound's should be live -- that is because DOMQuad exposes DOMPoint, we can set its points after retrieving a QuadBounds object. Our current code is live, setting the points changes the QuadBounds. Chromium's current behavior is to never update the QuadBounds object. I've left our behavior untouched in this patch (and waste 4 doubles per QuadBounds object), but I am intending to file a bug to understand what the intent of the spec is. I wonder if the author intended the points to be DOMPointReadOnly instead. If so, we could simplify the DOMRectReadOnly code and get rid of the virtual getters, which would be nice. I also wasn't thrilled to put the DOMMatrix setters on the DOMMatrixReadOnly class, but for brevity and simplicity of implementation, I've made them public. I briefly considered making the setters protected on the ReadOnly version of the class, but I'm not convinced that having to explicitly make them public on the derived class is worth the extra copies of the names. MozReview-Commit-ID: CjdW4Nbnc6A --HG-- extra : rebase_source : 44489693afebff571a415b487e29fa6153288421
2018-03-30 02:19:31 +03:00
double x1, x2;
x1 = x2 = Point(0)->X();
for (uint32_t i = 1; i < 4; ++i) {
double x = Point(i)->X();
x1 = std::min(x1, x);
x2 = std::max(x2, x);
}
Bug 1186265 - Partially update DOMPoint, DOMQuad, DOMRect, DOMMatrix. r=bz Some notes: this does not fully bring us to compliance to the current spec. Instead, these are the fixes that I needed to make in order to make css/geometry/interfaces.html pass with the DOMPoint changes in the previous patches. I don't fully understand why that patch caused the test to fail the way it did, but it ended up being easier to fix our code than understand why the harness was falling over. The DOMQuad::QuadBounds class was the source of some confusion for me. Now that DOMRectReadOnly is a concrete class with members, I wanted to avoid wasting them. However, the spec is unclear as to whether a DOMQuad's bound's should be live -- that is because DOMQuad exposes DOMPoint, we can set its points after retrieving a QuadBounds object. Our current code is live, setting the points changes the QuadBounds. Chromium's current behavior is to never update the QuadBounds object. I've left our behavior untouched in this patch (and waste 4 doubles per QuadBounds object), but I am intending to file a bug to understand what the intent of the spec is. I wonder if the author intended the points to be DOMPointReadOnly instead. If so, we could simplify the DOMRectReadOnly code and get rid of the virtual getters, which would be nice. I also wasn't thrilled to put the DOMMatrix setters on the DOMMatrixReadOnly class, but for brevity and simplicity of implementation, I've made them public. I briefly considered making the setters protected on the ReadOnly version of the class, but I'm not convinced that having to explicitly make them public on the derived class is worth the extra copies of the names. MozReview-Commit-ID: CjdW4Nbnc6A --HG-- extra : rebase_source : 44489693afebff571a415b487e29fa6153288421
2018-03-30 02:19:31 +03:00
*aX1 = x1;
*aX2 = x2;
}
Bug 1186265 - Partially update DOMPoint, DOMQuad, DOMRect, DOMMatrix. r=bz Some notes: this does not fully bring us to compliance to the current spec. Instead, these are the fixes that I needed to make in order to make css/geometry/interfaces.html pass with the DOMPoint changes in the previous patches. I don't fully understand why that patch caused the test to fail the way it did, but it ended up being easier to fix our code than understand why the harness was falling over. The DOMQuad::QuadBounds class was the source of some confusion for me. Now that DOMRectReadOnly is a concrete class with members, I wanted to avoid wasting them. However, the spec is unclear as to whether a DOMQuad's bound's should be live -- that is because DOMQuad exposes DOMPoint, we can set its points after retrieving a QuadBounds object. Our current code is live, setting the points changes the QuadBounds. Chromium's current behavior is to never update the QuadBounds object. I've left our behavior untouched in this patch (and waste 4 doubles per QuadBounds object), but I am intending to file a bug to understand what the intent of the spec is. I wonder if the author intended the points to be DOMPointReadOnly instead. If so, we could simplify the DOMRectReadOnly code and get rid of the virtual getters, which would be nice. I also wasn't thrilled to put the DOMMatrix setters on the DOMMatrixReadOnly class, but for brevity and simplicity of implementation, I've made them public. I briefly considered making the setters protected on the ReadOnly version of the class, but I'm not convinced that having to explicitly make them public on the derived class is worth the extra copies of the names. MozReview-Commit-ID: CjdW4Nbnc6A --HG-- extra : rebase_source : 44489693afebff571a415b487e29fa6153288421
2018-03-30 02:19:31 +03:00
void
DOMQuad::GetVerticalMinMax(double* aY1, double* aY2) const
{
double y1, y2;
y1 = y2 = Point(0)->Y();
for (uint32_t i = 1; i < 4; ++i) {
double y = Point(i)->Y();
y1 = std::min(y1, y);
y2 = std::max(y2, y);
}
Bug 1186265 - Partially update DOMPoint, DOMQuad, DOMRect, DOMMatrix. r=bz Some notes: this does not fully bring us to compliance to the current spec. Instead, these are the fixes that I needed to make in order to make css/geometry/interfaces.html pass with the DOMPoint changes in the previous patches. I don't fully understand why that patch caused the test to fail the way it did, but it ended up being easier to fix our code than understand why the harness was falling over. The DOMQuad::QuadBounds class was the source of some confusion for me. Now that DOMRectReadOnly is a concrete class with members, I wanted to avoid wasting them. However, the spec is unclear as to whether a DOMQuad's bound's should be live -- that is because DOMQuad exposes DOMPoint, we can set its points after retrieving a QuadBounds object. Our current code is live, setting the points changes the QuadBounds. Chromium's current behavior is to never update the QuadBounds object. I've left our behavior untouched in this patch (and waste 4 doubles per QuadBounds object), but I am intending to file a bug to understand what the intent of the spec is. I wonder if the author intended the points to be DOMPointReadOnly instead. If so, we could simplify the DOMRectReadOnly code and get rid of the virtual getters, which would be nice. I also wasn't thrilled to put the DOMMatrix setters on the DOMMatrixReadOnly class, but for brevity and simplicity of implementation, I've made them public. I briefly considered making the setters protected on the ReadOnly version of the class, but I'm not convinced that having to explicitly make them public on the derived class is worth the extra copies of the names. MozReview-Commit-ID: CjdW4Nbnc6A --HG-- extra : rebase_source : 44489693afebff571a415b487e29fa6153288421
2018-03-30 02:19:31 +03:00
*aY1 = y1;
*aY2 = y2;
}
DOMRectReadOnly*
DOMQuad::Bounds()
{
if (!mBounds) {
mBounds = GetBounds();
}
return mBounds;
}
Bug 1186265 - Partially update DOMPoint, DOMQuad, DOMRect, DOMMatrix. r=bz Some notes: this does not fully bring us to compliance to the current spec. Instead, these are the fixes that I needed to make in order to make css/geometry/interfaces.html pass with the DOMPoint changes in the previous patches. I don't fully understand why that patch caused the test to fail the way it did, but it ended up being easier to fix our code than understand why the harness was falling over. The DOMQuad::QuadBounds class was the source of some confusion for me. Now that DOMRectReadOnly is a concrete class with members, I wanted to avoid wasting them. However, the spec is unclear as to whether a DOMQuad's bound's should be live -- that is because DOMQuad exposes DOMPoint, we can set its points after retrieving a QuadBounds object. Our current code is live, setting the points changes the QuadBounds. Chromium's current behavior is to never update the QuadBounds object. I've left our behavior untouched in this patch (and waste 4 doubles per QuadBounds object), but I am intending to file a bug to understand what the intent of the spec is. I wonder if the author intended the points to be DOMPointReadOnly instead. If so, we could simplify the DOMRectReadOnly code and get rid of the virtual getters, which would be nice. I also wasn't thrilled to put the DOMMatrix setters on the DOMMatrixReadOnly class, but for brevity and simplicity of implementation, I've made them public. I briefly considered making the setters protected on the ReadOnly version of the class, but I'm not convinced that having to explicitly make them public on the derived class is worth the extra copies of the names. MozReview-Commit-ID: CjdW4Nbnc6A --HG-- extra : rebase_source : 44489693afebff571a415b487e29fa6153288421
2018-03-30 02:19:31 +03:00
already_AddRefed<DOMRectReadOnly>
DOMQuad::GetBounds() const
{
double x1, x2;
double y1, y2;
Bug 1186265 - Partially update DOMPoint, DOMQuad, DOMRect, DOMMatrix. r=bz Some notes: this does not fully bring us to compliance to the current spec. Instead, these are the fixes that I needed to make in order to make css/geometry/interfaces.html pass with the DOMPoint changes in the previous patches. I don't fully understand why that patch caused the test to fail the way it did, but it ended up being easier to fix our code than understand why the harness was falling over. The DOMQuad::QuadBounds class was the source of some confusion for me. Now that DOMRectReadOnly is a concrete class with members, I wanted to avoid wasting them. However, the spec is unclear as to whether a DOMQuad's bound's should be live -- that is because DOMQuad exposes DOMPoint, we can set its points after retrieving a QuadBounds object. Our current code is live, setting the points changes the QuadBounds. Chromium's current behavior is to never update the QuadBounds object. I've left our behavior untouched in this patch (and waste 4 doubles per QuadBounds object), but I am intending to file a bug to understand what the intent of the spec is. I wonder if the author intended the points to be DOMPointReadOnly instead. If so, we could simplify the DOMRectReadOnly code and get rid of the virtual getters, which would be nice. I also wasn't thrilled to put the DOMMatrix setters on the DOMMatrixReadOnly class, but for brevity and simplicity of implementation, I've made them public. I briefly considered making the setters protected on the ReadOnly version of the class, but I'm not convinced that having to explicitly make them public on the derived class is worth the extra copies of the names. MozReview-Commit-ID: CjdW4Nbnc6A --HG-- extra : rebase_source : 44489693afebff571a415b487e29fa6153288421
2018-03-30 02:19:31 +03:00
GetHorizontalMinMax(&x1, &x2);
GetVerticalMinMax(&y1, &y2);
Bug 1186265 - Partially update DOMPoint, DOMQuad, DOMRect, DOMMatrix. r=bz Some notes: this does not fully bring us to compliance to the current spec. Instead, these are the fixes that I needed to make in order to make css/geometry/interfaces.html pass with the DOMPoint changes in the previous patches. I don't fully understand why that patch caused the test to fail the way it did, but it ended up being easier to fix our code than understand why the harness was falling over. The DOMQuad::QuadBounds class was the source of some confusion for me. Now that DOMRectReadOnly is a concrete class with members, I wanted to avoid wasting them. However, the spec is unclear as to whether a DOMQuad's bound's should be live -- that is because DOMQuad exposes DOMPoint, we can set its points after retrieving a QuadBounds object. Our current code is live, setting the points changes the QuadBounds. Chromium's current behavior is to never update the QuadBounds object. I've left our behavior untouched in this patch (and waste 4 doubles per QuadBounds object), but I am intending to file a bug to understand what the intent of the spec is. I wonder if the author intended the points to be DOMPointReadOnly instead. If so, we could simplify the DOMRectReadOnly code and get rid of the virtual getters, which would be nice. I also wasn't thrilled to put the DOMMatrix setters on the DOMMatrixReadOnly class, but for brevity and simplicity of implementation, I've made them public. I briefly considered making the setters protected on the ReadOnly version of the class, but I'm not convinced that having to explicitly make them public on the derived class is worth the extra copies of the names. MozReview-Commit-ID: CjdW4Nbnc6A --HG-- extra : rebase_source : 44489693afebff571a415b487e29fa6153288421
2018-03-30 02:19:31 +03:00
RefPtr<DOMRectReadOnly> rval = new DOMRectReadOnly(GetParentObject(),
x1, y1, x2 - x1, y2 - y1);
return rval.forget();
}
void
DOMQuad::ToJSON(DOMQuadJSON& aInit)
{
aInit.mP1.Construct(RefPtr<DOMPoint>(P1()).forget());
aInit.mP2.Construct(RefPtr<DOMPoint>(P2()).forget());
aInit.mP3.Construct(RefPtr<DOMPoint>(P3()).forget());
aInit.mP4.Construct(RefPtr<DOMPoint>(P4()).forget());
}