gecko-dev/editor/libeditor/tests/test_nsITableEditor_insertT...

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

401 строка
22 KiB
HTML
Исходник Обычный вид История

<!DOCTYPE>
<html>
<head>
<title>Test for nsITableEditor.insertTableCell()</title>
<script src="/tests/SimpleTest/SimpleTest.js"></script>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/tests/SimpleTest/test.css">
</head>
<body>
<div id="display">
</div>
<div id="content" contenteditable>out of table<table><tr><td>default content</td></tr></table></div>
<pre id="test">
</pre>
<script class="testbody" type="application/javascript">
"use strict";
SimpleTest.waitForExplicitFinish();
SimpleTest.waitForFocus(async () => {
await SpecialPowers.pushPrefEnv({
set: [["dom.input_events.beforeinput.enabled", true]],
});
let editor = document.getElementById("content");
let selection = document.getSelection();
let selectionRanges = [];
function checkInputEvent(aEvent, aDescription) {
ok(aEvent instanceof InputEvent,
`"${aEvent.type}" event should be dispatched with InputEvent interface ${aDescription}`);
is(aEvent.cancelable, false,
`"${aEvent.type}" event should be never cancelable ${aDescription}`);
is(aEvent.bubbles, true,
`"${aEvent.type}" event should always bubble ${aDescription}`);
is(aEvent.inputType, "",
`inputType of "${aEvent.type}" event should be empty string ${aDescription}`);
is(aEvent.data, null,
`data of "${aEvent.type}" event should be null ${aDescription}`);
is(aEvent.dataTransfer, null,
`dataTransfer of "${aEvent.type}" event should be null ${aDescription}`);
let targetRanges = aEvent.getTargetRanges();
if (aEvent.type === "beforeinput") {
is(targetRanges.length, selectionRanges.length,
`getTargetRanges() of "beforeinput" event should return selection ranges ${aDescription}`);
if (targetRanges.length === selectionRanges.length) {
for (let i = 0; i < selectionRanges.length; i++) {
is(targetRanges[i].startContainer, selectionRanges[i].startContainer,
`startContainer of getTargetRanges()[${i}] of "beforeinput" event does not match ${aDescription}`);
is(targetRanges[i].startOffset, selectionRanges[i].startOffset,
`startOffset of getTargetRanges()[${i}] of "beforeinput" event does not match ${aDescription}`);
is(targetRanges[i].endContainer, selectionRanges[i].endContainer,
`endContainer of getTargetRanges()[${i}] of "beforeinput" event does not match ${aDescription}`);
is(targetRanges[i].endOffset, selectionRanges[i].endOffset,
`endOffset of getTargetRanges()[${i}] of "beforeinput" event does not match ${aDescription}`);
}
}
} else {
is(targetRanges.length, 0,
`getTargetRanges() of "${aEvent.type}" event should return empty array ${aDescription}`);
}
}
let beforeInputEvents = [];
let inputEvents = [];
function onBeforeInput(aEvent) {
beforeInputEvents.push(aEvent);
selectionRanges = [];
for (let i = 0; i < selection.rangeCount; i++) {
let range = selection.getRangeAt(i);
selectionRanges.push({startContainer: range.startContainer, startOffset: range.startOffset,
endContainer: range.endContainer, endOffset: range.endOffset});
}
}
function onInput(aEvent) {
inputEvents.push(aEvent);
}
editor.addEventListener("beforeinput", onBeforeInput);
editor.addEventListener("input", onInput);
beforeInputEvents = [];
inputEvents = [];
selection.collapse(editor.firstChild, 0);
getTableEditor().insertTableCell(1, false);
is(editor.innerHTML, "out of table<table><tbody><tr><td>default content</td></tr></tbody></table>",
"nsITableEditor.insertTableCell(1, false) should do nothing if selection is not in <table>");
is(beforeInputEvents.length, 1,
'"beforeinput" event should be fired when a call of nsITableEditor.insertTableCell(1, false) even though it will do nothing');
checkInputEvent(beforeInputEvents[0], "when selection collapsed outside table element (nsITableEditor.insertTableCell(1, false))");
is(inputEvents.length, 0,
'No "input" event should be fired when a call of nsITableEditor.insertTableCell(1, false) does nothing');
beforeInputEvents = [];
inputEvents = [];
getTableEditor().insertTableCell(1, true);
is(editor.innerHTML, "out of table<table><tbody><tr><td>default content</td></tr></tbody></table>",
"nsITableEditor.insertTableCell(1, true) should do nothing if selection is not in <table>");
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
is(beforeInputEvents.length, 1,
'"beforeinput" event should be fired when a call of nsITableEditor.insertTableCell(1, true) even though it will do nothing');
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
checkInputEvent(beforeInputEvents[0], "when selection is collapsed outside table element (nsITableEditor.insertTableCell(1, true))");
is(inputEvents.length, 0,
'No "input" event should be fired when a call of nsITableEditor.insertTableCell(1, true) does nothing');
selection.removeAllRanges();
try {
beforeInputEvents = [];
inputEvents = [];
getTableEditor().insertTableCell(1, false);
ok(false, "getTableEditor().insertTableCell(1, false) without selection ranges should throw exception");
} catch (e) {
ok(true, "getTableEditor().insertTableCell(1, false) without selection ranges should throw exception");
is(beforeInputEvents.length, 0,
'No "beforeinput" event should be fired when nsITableEditor.insertTableCell(1, false) causes exception due to no selection range');
is(inputEvents.length, 0,
'No "input" event should be fired when nsITableEditor.insertTableCell(1, false) causes exception due to no selection range');
}
try {
beforeInputEvents = [];
inputEvents = [];
getTableEditor().insertTableCell(1, true);
ok(false, "getTableEditor().insertTableCell(1, true) without selection ranges should throw exception");
} catch (e) {
ok(true, "getTableEditor().insertTableCell(1, true) without selection ranges should throw exception");
is(beforeInputEvents.length, 0,
'No "beforeinput" event should be fired when nsITableEditor.insertTableCell(1, true) causes exception due to no selection range');
is(inputEvents.length, 0,
'No "input" event should be fired when nsITableEditor.insertTableCell(1, true) causes exception due to no selection range');
}
selection.removeAllRanges();
editor.innerHTML = "<table>" +
"<tr><td>cell1-1</td><td>cell1-2</td></tr>" +
'<tr><td id="select">cell2-1</td><td>cell2-2</td></tr>' +
"<tr><td>cell3-1</td><td>cell3-2</td></tr>" +
"</table>";
editor.focus();
editor.scrollTop; // layout information required.
beforeInputEvents = [];
inputEvents = [];
selection.setBaseAndExtent(document.getElementById("select").firstChild, 0,
document.getElementById("select").firstChild, 0);
getTableEditor().insertTableCell(1, false);
is(editor.innerHTML, "<table><tbody>" +
"<tr><td>cell1-1</td><td>cell1-2</td></tr>" +
'<tr><td valign="top"><br></td><td id="select">cell2-1</td><td>cell2-2</td></tr>' +
"<tr><td>cell3-1</td><td>cell3-2</td></tr>" +
"</tbody></table>",
"nsITableEditor.insertTableCell(1, false) should insert a cell before the cell containing selection");
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
is(beforeInputEvents.length, 1,
'Only one "beforeinput" event should be fired when selection collapsed in a cell in middle row (before)');
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
checkInputEvent(beforeInputEvents[0], "when selection collapsed in a cell in middle row (before)");
is(inputEvents.length, 1,
'Only one "input" event should be fired when selection collapsed in a cell in middle row (before)');
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
checkInputEvent(inputEvents[0], "when selection collapsed in a cell in middle row (before)");
selection.removeAllRanges();
editor.innerHTML = "<table>" +
"<tr><td>cell1-1</td><td>cell1-2</td></tr>" +
'<tr><td id="select">cell2-1</td><td>cell2-2</td></tr>' +
"<tr><td>cell3-1</td><td>cell3-2</td></tr>" +
"</table>";
editor.focus();
editor.scrollTop; // layout information required.
beforeInputEvents = [];
inputEvents = [];
selection.setBaseAndExtent(document.getElementById("select").firstChild, 0,
document.getElementById("select").firstChild, 0);
getTableEditor().insertTableCell(1, true);
is(editor.innerHTML, "<table><tbody>" +
"<tr><td>cell1-1</td><td>cell1-2</td></tr>" +
'<tr><td id="select">cell2-1</td><td valign="top"><br></td><td>cell2-2</td></tr>' +
"<tr><td>cell3-1</td><td>cell3-2</td></tr>" +
"</tbody></table>",
"nsITableEditor.insertTableCell(1, true) should insert a cell after the cell containing selection");
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
is(beforeInputEvents.length, 1,
'Only one "beforeinput" event should be fired when selection collapsed in a cell in middle row (after)');
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
checkInputEvent(beforeInputEvents[0], "when selection collapsed in a cell in middle row (after)");
is(inputEvents.length, 1,
'Only one "input" event should be fired when selection collapsed in a cell in middle row (after)');
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
checkInputEvent(inputEvents[0], "when selection collapsed in a cell in middle row (after)");
// with rowspan.
// Odd case. This puts the cell containing selection moves right of row-spanning cell.
selection.removeAllRanges();
editor.innerHTML = "<table>" +
'<tr><td>cell1-1</td><td rowspan="2">cell1-2</td></tr>' +
'<tr><td id="select">cell2-1</td></tr>' +
"<tr><td>cell3-1</td><td>cell3-2</td></tr>" +
"</table>";
editor.focus();
editor.scrollTop; // layout information required.
beforeInputEvents = [];
inputEvents = [];
selection.setBaseAndExtent(document.getElementById("select").firstChild, 0,
document.getElementById("select").firstChild, 0);
getTableEditor().insertTableCell(1, false);
is(editor.innerHTML, "<table><tbody>" +
'<tr><td>cell1-1</td><td rowspan="2">cell1-2</td></tr>' +
'<tr><td valign="top"><br></td><td id="select">cell2-1</td></tr>' +
"<tr><td>cell3-1</td><td>cell3-2</td></tr>" +
"</tbody></table>",
"nsITableEditor.insertTableCell(1, false) should insert a cell before the cell containing selection and moves the cell to right of the row-spanning cell element");
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
is(beforeInputEvents.length, 1,
'Only one "beforeinput" event should be fired when selection collapsed in a cell in middle row and it has row-spanned cell (before)');
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
checkInputEvent(beforeInputEvents[0], "when selection collapsed in a cell in middle row and it has row-spanned cell (before)");
is(inputEvents.length, 1,
'Only one "input" event should be fired when selection collapsed in a cell in middle row and it has row-spanned cell (before)');
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
checkInputEvent(inputEvents[0], "when selection collapsed in a cell in middle row and it has row-spanned cell (before)");
selection.removeAllRanges();
editor.innerHTML = "<table>" +
'<tr><td>cell1-1</td><td rowspan="3">cell1-2</td></tr>' +
'<tr><td id="select">cell2-1</td></tr>' +
"<tr><td>cell3-1</td></tr>" +
"</table>";
editor.focus();
editor.scrollTop; // layout information required.
beforeInputEvents = [];
inputEvents = [];
selection.setBaseAndExtent(document.getElementById("select").firstChild, 0,
document.getElementById("select").firstChild, 0);
getTableEditor().insertTableCell(1, true);
is(editor.innerHTML, "<table><tbody>" +
'<tr><td>cell1-1</td><td rowspan="3">cell1-2</td></tr>' +
'<tr><td id="select">cell2-1</td><td valign="top"><br></td></tr>' +
"<tr><td>cell3-1</td></tr>" +
"</tbody></table>",
"nsITableEditor.insertTableCell(1, true) should insert a cell after the cell containing selection and moves the cell to right of the row-spanning cell element");
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
is(beforeInputEvents.length, 1,
'Only one "beforeinput" event should be fired when selection collapsed in a cell in middle row and it has row-spanned cell (after)');
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
checkInputEvent(beforeInputEvents[0], "when selection collapsed in a cell in middle row and it has row-spanned cell (after)");
is(inputEvents.length, 1,
'Only one "input" event should be fired when selection collapsed in a cell in middle row and it has row-spanned cell (after)');
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
checkInputEvent(inputEvents[0], "when selection collapsed in a cell in middle row and it has row-spanned cell (after)");
selection.removeAllRanges();
editor.innerHTML = "<table>" +
'<tr><td>cell1-1</td><td id="select" rowspan="2">cell1-2</td></tr>' +
"<tr><td>cell2-1</td></tr>" +
"<tr><td>cell3-1</td><td>cell3-2</td></tr>" +
"</table>";
editor.focus();
editor.scrollTop; // layout information required.
beforeInputEvents = [];
inputEvents = [];
selection.setBaseAndExtent(document.getElementById("select").firstChild, 0,
document.getElementById("select").firstChild, 1);
getTableEditor().insertTableCell(2, false);
is(editor.innerHTML, "<table><tbody>" +
'<tr><td>cell1-1</td><td valign="top"><br></td><td valign="top"><br></td><td id="select" rowspan="2">cell1-2</td></tr>' +
"<tr><td>cell2-1</td></tr>" +
"<tr><td>cell3-1</td><td>cell3-2</td></tr>" +
"</tbody></table>",
"nsITableEditor.insertTableCell(2, false) should insert 2 cells before the row-spanning cell containing selection");
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
is(beforeInputEvents.length, 1,
'Only one "beforeinput" event should be fired when selection collapsed in a cell in row-spanning (before)');
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
checkInputEvent(beforeInputEvents[0], "when selection collapsed in a cell in row-spanning (before)");
is(inputEvents.length, 1,
'Only one "input" event should be fired when selection collapsed in a cell in row-spanning (before)');
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
checkInputEvent(inputEvents[0], "when selection collapsed in a cell in row-spanning (before)");
selection.removeAllRanges();
editor.innerHTML = "<table>" +
'<tr><td>cell1-1</td><td id="select" rowspan="2">cell1-2</td></tr>' +
"<tr><td>cell2-1</td></tr>" +
"<tr><td>cell3-1</td><td>cell3-2</td></tr>" +
"</table>";
editor.focus();
editor.scrollTop; // layout information required.
beforeInputEvents = [];
inputEvents = [];
selection.setBaseAndExtent(document.getElementById("select").firstChild, 0,
document.getElementById("select").firstChild, 1);
getTableEditor().insertTableCell(2, true);
is(editor.innerHTML, "<table><tbody>" +
'<tr><td>cell1-1</td><td id="select" rowspan="2">cell1-2</td><td valign="top"><br></td><td valign="top"><br></td></tr>' +
"<tr><td>cell2-1</td></tr>" +
"<tr><td>cell3-1</td><td>cell3-2</td></tr>" +
"</tbody></table>",
"nsITableEditor.insertTableCell(2, false) should insert 2 cells after the row-spanning cell containing selection");
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
is(beforeInputEvents.length, 1,
'Only one "beforeinput" event should be fired when selection collapsed in a cell in row-spanning (after)');
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
checkInputEvent(beforeInputEvents[0], "when selection collapsed in a cell in row-spanning (after)");
is(inputEvents.length, 1,
'Only one "input" event should be fired when selection collapsed in a cell in row-spanning (after)');
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
checkInputEvent(inputEvents[0], "when selection collapsed in a cell in row-spanning (after)");
// with colspan
selection.removeAllRanges();
editor.innerHTML = "<table>" +
'<tr><td>cell1-1</td><td id="select">cell1-2</td><td>cell1-3</td></tr>' +
'<tr><td colspan="2">cell2-1</td><td>cell2-3</td></tr>' +
"</table>";
editor.focus();
editor.scrollTop; // layout information required.
beforeInputEvents = [];
inputEvents = [];
selection.setBaseAndExtent(document.getElementById("select").firstChild, 0,
document.getElementById("select").firstChild, 0);
getTableEditor().insertTableCell(1, false);
is(editor.innerHTML, "<table><tbody>" +
'<tr><td>cell1-1</td><td valign="top"><br></td><td id="select">cell1-2</td><td>cell1-3</td></tr>' +
'<tr><td colspan="2">cell2-1</td><td>cell2-3</td></tr>' +
"</tbody></table>",
"nsITableEditor.insertTableCell(1, false) should insert a cell before the cell containing selection but do not modify col-spanning cell");
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
is(beforeInputEvents.length, 1,
'Only one "beforeinput" event should be fired when selection collapsed in a cell whose next row cell is col-spanned (before)');
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
checkInputEvent(beforeInputEvents[0], "when selection collapsed in a cell whose next row cell is col-spanned (before)");
is(inputEvents.length, 1,
'Only one "input" event should be fired when selection collapsed in a cell whose next row cell is col-spanned (before)');
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
checkInputEvent(inputEvents[0], "when selection collapsed in a cell whose next row cell is col-spanned (before)");
selection.removeAllRanges();
editor.innerHTML = "<table>" +
'<tr><td>cell1-1</td><td id="select">cell1-2</td><td>cell1-3</td></tr>' +
'<tr><td colspan="3">cell2-1</td></tr>' +
"</table>";
editor.focus();
editor.scrollTop; // layout information required.
beforeInputEvents = [];
inputEvents = [];
selection.setBaseAndExtent(document.getElementById("select").firstChild, 0,
document.getElementById("select").firstChild, 0);
getTableEditor().insertTableCell(1, true);
is(editor.innerHTML, "<table><tbody>" +
'<tr><td>cell1-1</td><td id="select">cell1-2</td><td valign="top"><br></td><td>cell1-3</td></tr>' +
'<tr><td colspan="3">cell2-1</td></tr>' +
"</tbody></table>",
"nsITableEditor.insertTableCell(1, true) should insert a cell after the cell containing selection but do not modify col-spanning cell");
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
is(beforeInputEvents.length, 1,
'Only one "beforeinput" event should be fired when selection collapsed in a cell whose next row cell is col-spanned (after)');
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
checkInputEvent(beforeInputEvents[0], "when selection collapsed in a cell whose next row cell is col-spanned (after)");
is(inputEvents.length, 1,
'Only one "input" event should be fired when selection collapsed in a cell whose next row cell is col-spanned (after)');
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
checkInputEvent(inputEvents[0], "when selection collapsed in a cell whose next row cell is col-spanned (after)");
selection.removeAllRanges();
editor.innerHTML = "<table>" +
"<tr><td>cell1-1</td><td>cell1-2</td><td>cell1-3</td></tr>" +
'<tr><td id="select" colspan="2">cell2-1</td><td>cell2-3</td></tr>' +
"</table>";
editor.focus();
editor.scrollTop; // layout information required.
beforeInputEvents = [];
inputEvents = [];
selection.setBaseAndExtent(document.getElementById("select").firstChild, 0,
document.getElementById("select").firstChild, 1);
getTableEditor().insertTableCell(2, false);
is(editor.innerHTML, "<table><tbody>" +
"<tr><td>cell1-1</td><td>cell1-2</td><td>cell1-3</td></tr>" +
'<tr><td valign="top"><br></td><td valign="top"><br></td><td id="select" colspan="2">cell2-1</td><td>cell2-3</td></tr>' +
"</tbody></table>",
"nsITableEditor.insertTableCell(2, false) should insert 2 cells before the col-spanning cell containing selection");
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
is(beforeInputEvents.length, 1,
'Only one "beforeinput" event should be fired when selection collapsed in a cell which is col-spanning (before)');
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
checkInputEvent(beforeInputEvents[0], "when selection collapsed in a cell which is col-spanning (before)");
is(inputEvents.length, 1,
'Only one "input" event should be fired when selection collapsed in a cell which is col-spanning (before)');
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
checkInputEvent(inputEvents[0], "when selection collapsed in a cell which is col-spanning (before)");
selection.removeAllRanges();
editor.innerHTML = "<table>" +
"<tr><td>cell1-1</td><td>cell1-2</td><td>cell1-3</td></tr>" +
'<tr><td id="select" colspan="2">cell2-1</td><td>cell2-3</td></tr>' +
"</table>";
editor.focus();
editor.scrollTop; // layout information required.
beforeInputEvents = [];
inputEvents = [];
selection.setBaseAndExtent(document.getElementById("select").firstChild, 0,
document.getElementById("select").firstChild, 1);
getTableEditor().insertTableCell(2, true);
is(editor.innerHTML, "<table><tbody>" +
"<tr><td>cell1-1</td><td>cell1-2</td><td>cell1-3</td></tr>" +
'<tr><td id="select" colspan="2">cell2-1</td><td valign="top"><br></td><td valign="top"><br></td><td>cell2-3</td></tr>' +
"</tbody></table>",
"nsITableEditor.insertTableCell(2, false) should insert 2 cells after the col-spanning cell containing selection");
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
is(beforeInputEvents.length, 1,
'Only one "beforeinput" event should be fired when selection collapsed in a cell which is col-spanning (after)');
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
checkInputEvent(beforeInputEvents[0], "when selection collapsed in a cell which is col-spanning (after)");
is(inputEvents.length, 1,
'Only one "input" event should be fired when selection collapsed in a cell which is col-spanning (after)');
Bug 970802 - part 5: Make `AutoEditActionDataSetter` created method dispatch "beforeinput" event r=smaug,m_kato `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as editor itself, selection controller, etc. The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED` if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error. So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is canceled. In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better idea. Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after `keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility. Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220 Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues. However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`, composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so). Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49 Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and `dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with `MOZ_ASSERT`s. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
2020-01-14 10:18:51 +03:00
checkInputEvent(inputEvents[0], "when selection collapsed in a cell which is col-spanning (after)");
editor.removeEventListener("beforeinput", onBeforeInput);
editor.removeEventListener("input", onInput);
SimpleTest.finish();
});
function getTableEditor() {
var editingSession = SpecialPowers.wrap(window).docShell.editingSession;
return editingSession.getEditorForWindow(window).QueryInterface(SpecialPowers.Ci.nsITableEditor);
}
</script>
</body>
</html>