зеркало из https://github.com/mozilla/gecko-dev.git
57 строки
3.3 KiB
ReStructuredText
57 строки
3.3 KiB
ReStructuredText
|
Hashing
|
||
|
=======
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. warning::
|
||
|
|
||
|
The overarching theme is to never set the ``@attr.s(hash=X)`` parameter yourself.
|
||
|
Leave it at ``None`` which means that ``attrs`` will do the right thing for you, depending on the other parameters:
|
||
|
|
||
|
- If you want to make objects hashable by value: use ``@attr.s(frozen=True)``.
|
||
|
- If you want hashing and comparison by object identity: use ``@attr.s(cmp=False)``
|
||
|
|
||
|
Setting ``hash`` yourself can have unexpected consequences so we recommend to tinker with it only if you know exactly what you're doing.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Under certain circumstances, it's necessary for objects to be *hashable*.
|
||
|
For example if you want to put them into a :class:`set` or if you want to use them as keys in a :class:`dict`.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The *hash* of an object is an integer that represents the contents of an object.
|
||
|
It can be obtained by calling :func:`hash` on an object and is implemented by writing a ``__hash__`` method for your class.
|
||
|
|
||
|
``attrs`` will happily write a ``__hash__`` method you [#fn1]_, however it will *not* do so by default.
|
||
|
Because according to the definition_ from the official Python docs, the returned hash has to fullfil certain constraints:
|
||
|
|
||
|
#. Two objects that are equal, **must** have the same hash.
|
||
|
This means that if ``x == y``, it *must* follow that ``hash(x) == hash(y)``.
|
||
|
|
||
|
By default, Python classes are compared *and* hashed by their :func:`id`.
|
||
|
That means that every instance of a class has a different hash, no matter what attributes it carries.
|
||
|
|
||
|
It follows that the moment you (or ``attrs``) change the way equality is handled by implementing ``__eq__`` which is based on attribute values, this constraint is broken.
|
||
|
For that reason Python 3 will make a class that has customized equality unhashable.
|
||
|
Python 2 on the other hand will happily let you shoot your foot off.
|
||
|
Unfortunately ``attrs`` currently mimics Python 2's behavior for backward compatibility reasons if you set ``hash=False``.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The *correct way* to achieve hashing by id is to set ``@attr.s(cmp=False)``.
|
||
|
Setting ``@attr.s(hash=False)`` (that implies ``cmp=True``) is almost certainly a *bug*.
|
||
|
|
||
|
#. If two object are not equal, their hash **should** be different.
|
||
|
|
||
|
While this isn't a requirement from a standpoint of correctness, sets and dicts become less effective if there are a lot of identical hashes.
|
||
|
The worst case is when all objects have the same hash which turns a set into a list.
|
||
|
|
||
|
#. The hash of an object **must not** change.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you create a class with ``@attr.s(frozen=True)`` this is fullfilled by definition, therefore ``attrs`` will write a ``__hash__`` function for you automatically.
|
||
|
You can also force it to write one with ``hash=True`` but then it's *your* responsibility to make sure that the object is not mutated.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This point is the reason why mutable structures like lists, dictionaries, or sets aren't hashable while immutable ones like tuples or frozensets are:
|
||
|
point 1 and 2 require that the hash changes with the contents but point 3 forbids it.
|
||
|
|
||
|
For a more thorough explanation of this topic, please refer to this blog post: `Python Hashes and Equality`_.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. [#fn1] The hash is computed by hashing a tuple that consists of an unique id for the class plus all attribute values.
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. _definition: https://docs.python.org/3/glossary.html#term-hashable
|
||
|
.. _`Python Hashes and Equality`: https://hynek.me/articles/hashes-and-equality/
|