Bug 1252361 - Produce UNEXPECTED-PASS results for fuzzy tests that are overfuzzed. r=dbaron

This catches a common problem where somebody adds a fuzzy annotation on
a test to work around some minor differences. Later the differences go
away, but since the test harness doesn't catch that, nobody is the
wiser. Subsequently a "real" regression can reintroduce differences
which are hidden by the stale fuzzy annotations.

With this patch, if the annotations are set up properly, the test
harness will flag tests as "UNEXPECTED-PASS" when the differences go
away. This will require the patch author to reduce the allowed fuzziness
parameters, and will make it easier to catch subsequent regressions.

MozReview-Commit-ID: B3rGPFLXkCu
This commit is contained in:
Kartikaya Gupta 2017-06-02 09:28:33 -04:00
Родитель 5fec8bb434
Коммит 748457c51a
2 изменённых файлов: 50 добавлений и 12 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -147,11 +147,21 @@ fails test-pref(font.size.variable.x-western,"foo") == font-default.html font-si
ref-pref(font.size.variable.x-western,16) test-pref(font.size.variable.x-western,24) skip-if(styloVsGecko) != font-default.html font-default.html
ref-pref(font.size.variable.x-western,24) test-pref(font.size.variable.x-western,16) skip-if(styloVsGecko) != font-default.html font-default.html
ref-pref(font.size.variable.x-western,24) test-pref(font.size.variable.x-western,24) skip-if(styloVsGecko) == font-default.html font-default.html
# reftest syntax: fuzzy(maxPixelDifference,maxNumberDifferingPixels)
fuzzy(1,250000) == fuzzy.html fuzzy-ref.html
fuzzy(1,250000) != too-fuzzy.html fuzzy-ref.html
fuzzy-if(true,1,250000) == fuzzy.html fuzzy-ref.html
fuzzy-if(false,2,1) == fuzzy-ref.html fuzzy-ref.html
# test some ranged fuzzes
fuzzy(1-10,1-250000) fuzzy-if(false,5-10,250000) skip-if(styloVsGecko) == fuzzy.html fuzzy-ref.html
fuzzy(0-0,250000) skip-if(styloVsGecko) != fuzzy.html fuzzy-ref.html
fuzzy(1,0-2) skip-if(styloVsGecko) != fuzzy.html fuzzy-ref.html
# If enabled, the following two should result in UNEXPECTED-PASS because
# they are both overfuzzed
# fuzzy(3-4,250000) == fuzzy.html fuzzy-ref.html
# fuzzy(1,250001-250002) == fuzzy.html fuzzy-ref.html
#
# When using 565 fuzzy.html and fuzzy-ref.html will compare as equal
fails-if(!styloVsGecko) fuzzy-if(false,2,1) random-if(Android) == fuzzy.html fuzzy-ref.html

Просмотреть файл

@ -1638,7 +1638,8 @@ function RecordResult(testRunTime, errorMsg, scriptResults)
true: {s: ["PASS", "PASS"], n: "Random"},
false: {s: ["FAIL", "FAIL"], n: "Random"}
};
outputs[EXPECTED_FUZZY] = outputs[EXPECTED_PASS];
// for EXPECTED_FUZZY we need special handling because we can have
// Pass, UnexpectedPass, or UnexpectedFail
var output;
var extra;
@ -1740,23 +1741,30 @@ function RecordResult(testRunTime, errorMsg, scriptResults)
// whether the two renderings match:
var equal;
var maxDifference = {};
// whether the allowed fuzziness from the annotations is exceeded
// by the actual comparison results
var fuzz_exceeded = false;
differences = gWindowUtils.compareCanvases(gCanvas1, gCanvas2, maxDifference);
equal = (differences == 0);
if (maxDifference.value > 0 && equal) {
throw "Inconsistent result from compareCanvases.";
}
// what is expected on this platform (PASS, FAIL, or RANDOM)
var expected = gURLs[0].expected;
if (maxDifference.value > 0 &&
if (expected == EXPECTED_FUZZY) {
logger.info(`REFTEST fuzzy test ` +
`(${gURLs[0].fuzzyMinDelta}, ${gURLs[0].fuzzyMinPixels}) <= ` +
`(${maxDifference.value}, ${differences}) <= ` +
`(${gURLs[0].fuzzyMaxDelta}, ${gURLs[0].fuzzyMaxPixels})`);
fuzz_exceeded = maxDifference.value > gURLs[0].fuzzyMaxDelta ||
differences > gURLs[0].fuzzyMaxPixels;
equal = !fuzz_exceeded &&
maxDifference.value >= gURLs[0].fuzzyMinDelta &&
maxDifference.value <= gURLs[0].fuzzyMaxDelta &&
differences >= gURLs[0].fuzzyMinPixels &&
differences <= gURLs[0].fuzzyMaxPixels) {
if (equal) {
throw "Inconsistent result from compareCanvases.";
}
equal = expected == EXPECTED_FUZZY;
logger.info(`REFTEST fuzzy match (${maxDifference.value}, ${differences}) <= (${gURLs[0].fuzzyMaxDelta}, ${gURLs[0].fuzzyMaxPixels})`);
differences >= gURLs[0].fuzzyMinPixels;
}
var failedExtraCheck = gFailedNoPaint || gFailedOpaqueLayer || gFailedAssignedLayer;
@ -1764,7 +1772,27 @@ function RecordResult(testRunTime, errorMsg, scriptResults)
// whether the comparison result matches what is in the manifest
var test_passed = (equal == (gURLs[0].type == TYPE_REFTEST_EQUAL)) && !failedExtraCheck;
if (expected != EXPECTED_FUZZY) {
output = outputs[expected][test_passed];
} else if (test_passed) {
output = {s: ["PASS", "PASS"], n: "Pass"};
} else if (gURLs[0].type == TYPE_REFTEST_EQUAL &&
!failedExtraCheck &&
!fuzz_exceeded) {
// If we get here, that means we had an '==' type test where
// at least one of the actual difference values was below the
// allowed range, but nothing else was wrong. So let's produce
// UNEXPECTED-PASS in this scenario. Also, if we enter this
// branch, 'equal' must be false so let's assert that to guard
// against logic errors.
if (equal) {
throw "Logic error in reftest.jsm fuzzy test handling!";
}
output = {s: ["PASS", "FAIL"], n: "UnexpectedPass"};
} else {
// In all other cases we fail the test
output = {s: ["FAIL", "PASS"], n: "UnexpectedFail"};
}
extra = { status_msg: output.n };
++gTestResults[output.n];