From 759eebe6d2345def27118f034acd91d244f840db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 21:22:20 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Bug 1040386:  Fix hopefully-harmless CSS syntax error in
 isOMTAWorking().  r=birtles

I noticed this in the logs of a B2G emulator mochitest run.
---
 layout/style/test/animation_utils.js | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/layout/style/test/animation_utils.js b/layout/style/test/animation_utils.js
index ef6a18dcf637..a75780f5909c 100644
--- a/layout/style/test/animation_utils.js
+++ b/layout/style/test/animation_utils.js
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ function runOMTATest(aTestFunction, aOnSkip) {
     // Create keyframes rule
     const animationName = "a6ce3091ed85"; // Random name to avoid clashes
     var ruleText = "@keyframes " + animationName +
-                   " { from { opacity: 0.5 } to { opacity 0.5 } }";
+                   " { from { opacity: 0.5 } to { opacity: 0.5 } }";
     var style = document.createElement("style");
     style.appendChild(document.createTextNode(ruleText));
     document.head.appendChild(style);