Just use our document for the doc we call ContentStatesChanged on instead of

trying to get it off the content nodes (which may no longer be in a document by
this point).  Bug 274736, r+sr=roc, a=shaver
This commit is contained in:
bzbarsky%mit.edu 2005-06-01 15:38:09 +00:00
Родитель 137b2f7312
Коммит 9aa0fb9ff9
1 изменённых файлов: 2 добавлений и 24 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -3681,20 +3681,6 @@ static nsIContent* FindCommonAncestor(nsIContent *aNode1, nsIContent *aNode2)
break;
anc2 = parent;
}
#ifdef DEBUG
if (anc1 != anc2) {
// This could be a performance problem.
// The |!anc1->GetDocument()| case (that aNode1 has been removed
// from the document) could be a slight performance problem. It's
// rare enough that it shouldn't be an issue, but common enough
// that we don't want to assert..
NS_ASSERTION(!anc1->GetDocument(),
"moved hover/active between nodes in different documents");
// XXX Why don't we ever hit this code because we're not using
// |GetBindingParent|?
}
#endif
if (anc1 == anc2) {
anc1 = aNode1;
anc2 = aNode2;
@ -3870,17 +3856,9 @@ nsEventStateManager::SetContentState(nsIContent *aContent, PRInt32 aState)
}
}
}
else if (newHover) {
doc1 = newHover->GetDocument();
}
else if (oldHover) {
doc1 = oldHover->GetDocument();
}
else if (newActive) {
doc1 = newActive->GetDocument();
}
else {
doc1 = oldActive->GetDocument();
EnsureDocument(mPresContext);
doc1 = mDocument;
}
if (doc1) {
doc1->BeginUpdate(UPDATE_CONTENT_STATE);