зеркало из https://github.com/mozilla/gecko-dev.git
Bug 1616684. Remove implicit integer conversion in CheckedInt constructor r=froydnj
When I try to enable -Wconversion, CheckedInt triggers it because it has an implicit type conversion in its templated two-arg constructor. That constructor doesn't really need to be templated, as far as I can tell. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D63384 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
b1f8deb8c6
Коммит
acaa2133b1
|
@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
|
|||
#include "mozilla/Attributes.h"
|
||||
#include "mozilla/IntegerTypeTraits.h"
|
||||
#include <limits>
|
||||
#include <type_traits>
|
||||
|
||||
#define MOZILLA_CHECKEDINT_COMPARABLE_VERSION(major, minor, patch) \
|
||||
(major << 16 | minor << 8 | patch)
|
||||
|
@ -408,7 +409,8 @@ struct NegateImpl<T, false> {
|
|||
static constexpr CheckedInt<T> negate(const CheckedInt<T>& aVal) {
|
||||
// Handle negation separately for signed/unsigned, for simpler code and to
|
||||
// avoid an MSVC warning negating an unsigned value.
|
||||
return CheckedInt<T>(0, aVal.isValid() && aVal.mValue == 0);
|
||||
static_assert(detail::IsInRange<T>(0), "Integer type can't represent 0");
|
||||
return CheckedInt<T>(T(0), aVal.isValid() && aVal.mValue == 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -420,7 +422,10 @@ struct NegateImpl<T, true> {
|
|||
if (!aVal.isValid() || aVal.mValue == std::numeric_limits<T>::min()) {
|
||||
return CheckedInt<T>(aVal.mValue, false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return CheckedInt<T>(-aVal.mValue, true);
|
||||
/* For some T, arithmetic ops automatically promote to a wider type, so
|
||||
* explitly do the narrowing cast here. The narrowing cast is valid because
|
||||
* we did the check for min value above. */
|
||||
return CheckedInt<T>(T(-aVal.mValue), true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -506,9 +511,10 @@ class CheckedInt {
|
|||
template <typename U>
|
||||
constexpr CheckedInt(U aValue, bool aIsValid)
|
||||
: mValue(aValue), mIsValid(aIsValid) {
|
||||
static_assert(
|
||||
detail::IsSupported<T>::value && detail::IsSupported<U>::value,
|
||||
"This type is not supported by CheckedInt");
|
||||
static_assert(std::is_same_v<T, U>,
|
||||
"this constructor must accept only T values");
|
||||
static_assert(detail::IsSupported<T>::value,
|
||||
"This type is not supported by CheckedInt");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
friend struct detail::NegateImpl<T>;
|
||||
|
@ -544,9 +550,10 @@ class CheckedInt {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Constructs a valid checked integer with initial value 0 */
|
||||
constexpr CheckedInt() : mValue(0), mIsValid(true) {
|
||||
constexpr CheckedInt() : mValue(T(0)), mIsValid(true) {
|
||||
static_assert(detail::IsSupported<T>::value,
|
||||
"This type is not supported by CheckedInt");
|
||||
static_assert(detail::IsInRange<T>(0), "Integer type can't represent 0");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** @returns the actual value */
|
||||
|
@ -668,15 +675,20 @@ class CheckedInt {
|
|||
bool operator>=(U aOther) const = delete;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
#define MOZ_CHECKEDINT_BASIC_BINARY_OPERATOR(NAME, OP) \
|
||||
template <typename T> \
|
||||
constexpr CheckedInt<T> operator OP(const CheckedInt<T>& aLhs, \
|
||||
const CheckedInt<T>& aRhs) { \
|
||||
if (!detail::Is##NAME##Valid(aLhs.mValue, aRhs.mValue)) { \
|
||||
return CheckedInt<T>(0, false); \
|
||||
} \
|
||||
return CheckedInt<T>(aLhs.mValue OP aRhs.mValue, \
|
||||
aLhs.mIsValid && aRhs.mIsValid); \
|
||||
#define MOZ_CHECKEDINT_BASIC_BINARY_OPERATOR(NAME, OP) \
|
||||
template <typename T> \
|
||||
constexpr CheckedInt<T> operator OP(const CheckedInt<T>& aLhs, \
|
||||
const CheckedInt<T>& aRhs) { \
|
||||
if (!detail::Is##NAME##Valid(aLhs.mValue, aRhs.mValue)) { \
|
||||
static_assert(detail::IsInRange<T>(0), \
|
||||
"Integer type can't represent 0"); \
|
||||
return CheckedInt<T>(T(0), false); \
|
||||
} \
|
||||
/* For some T, arithmetic ops automatically promote to a wider type, so \
|
||||
* explitly do the narrowing cast here. The narrowing cast is valid \
|
||||
* because we did the "Is##NAME##Valid" check above. */ \
|
||||
return CheckedInt<T>(T(aLhs.mValue OP aRhs.mValue), \
|
||||
aLhs.mIsValid && aRhs.mIsValid); \
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#if MOZ_HAS_BUILTIN_OP_OVERFLOW
|
||||
|
@ -686,7 +698,9 @@ class CheckedInt {
|
|||
const CheckedInt<T>& aRhs) { \
|
||||
auto result = T{}; \
|
||||
if (FUN(aLhs.mValue, aRhs.mValue, &result)) { \
|
||||
return CheckedInt<T>(0, false); \
|
||||
static_assert(detail::IsInRange<T>(0), \
|
||||
"Integer type can't represent 0"); \
|
||||
return CheckedInt<T>(T(0), false); \
|
||||
} \
|
||||
return CheckedInt<T>(result, aLhs.mIsValid && aRhs.mIsValid); \
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче