diff --git a/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/status.html b/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/status.html index de788e0f8669..145c0bab3725 100644 --- a/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/status.html +++ b/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/status.html @@ -102,19 +102,12 @@ these two compilers on the various platforms where this same code is used. -Coded +Done OS/2 Contributed code! John Fairhurst <mjf35@cam.ac.uk> - -Henry Sobotka <sobotka@axess.com> wrote: -This is just to let you know that John Fairhurst's port of xptcinvoke -and xptcstubs for our emx+gcc and pgcc builds has been done since March -27th (based on the timestamps of the two *_emx files in my copy of -md/os2). While I haven't tested it yet (just started working through -build breaks that occur with ENABLE_TESTS on), knowing John, I expect he -has. Don't know what the status of the port is for our VAC++ build. -John? +I never heard exactly who did what. But mozilla has been working on OS/2 +for a long time now. @@ -232,7 +225,7 @@ a port. -Working +Done SunOS x86 Contributed code @@ -241,9 +234,7 @@ a port. Philip Pokorny <ppokorny@mindspring.com>
-This is currently using the generic Unixish x86 code. There are claims that it works fine. -Some doubt remains.
-see: bug #16114 +The word I hear is that this is working and done @@ -335,12 +326,13 @@ Patches for xptc*_unixish_x86.cpp checked in. Waiting for verification that this Investigating SCO UW7 and OSR5 -Investigating -Evan Hunt <evanh@sco.com>
+ Investigating -Kurt Muehlner <kurtm@sco.com>
+J. Kean Johnston <jkj@sco.com>
+Investigating +Evan Hunt <evanh@sco.com>
-- +Recent (Feb-2001) email from jkj@sco.com suggests that work will be occuring soon.