Changing comment, since I figured out why we're doing things in a wacky way.

No bug.
This commit is contained in:
bzbarsky%mit.edu 2006-02-22 05:09:01 +00:00
Родитель fbeec59b69
Коммит c82916e053
1 изменённых файлов: 8 добавлений и 2 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -124,8 +124,14 @@ NS_INTERFACE_MAP_BEGIN(nsContentTreeOwner)
NS_INTERFACE_MAP_ENTRY(nsIWebBrowserChrome2)
NS_INTERFACE_MAP_ENTRY(nsIInterfaceRequestor)
NS_INTERFACE_MAP_ENTRY(nsIWindowProvider)
// XXXbz why not just implement those interfaces directly on this object?
// Should file a followup and fix.
// NOTE: This is using aggregation because there are some properties and
// method on nsIBaeWindow (which we implement) and on nsIEmbeddingSiteWindow
// (which we also implement) that have the same name. And it just so
// happens that we want different behavior for these methods and properties
// depending on the interface through which they're called (SetFocus() is a
// good example here). If it were not for that, we could ditch the
// aggregation and just deal with not being able to use NS_DECL_* macros for
// this stuff....
NS_INTERFACE_MAP_ENTRY_AGGREGATED(nsIEmbeddingSiteWindow, mSiteWindow2)
NS_INTERFACE_MAP_ENTRY_AGGREGATED(nsIEmbeddingSiteWindow2, mSiteWindow2)
NS_INTERFACE_MAP_END