Bug 614958 - Don't release the socket transport's event sink while we're holding a lock, since it can result in retrying to obtain the same lock again, which causes a deadlock; r=biesi,bsmedberg a=blocking-beta8+ landed on a CLOSED TREE

This commit is contained in:
Ehsan Akhgari 2010-12-02 16:29:09 -05:00
Родитель bc2ff22c6c
Коммит d12271f37a
1 изменённых файлов: 7 добавлений и 1 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -1612,6 +1612,12 @@ nsSocketTransport::OnSocketDetached(PRFileDesc *fd)
// finally, release our reference to the socket (must do this within
// the transport lock) possibly closing the socket. Also release our
// listeners to break potential refcount cycles.
// We should be careful not to release mEventSink while we're locked,
// because releasing it might require acquiring the lock again, so
// we just null out mEventSink while we're holding the lock, and let
// ourEventSink's destuctor take care of destroying it if needed.
nsCOMPtr<nsITransportEventSink> ourEventSink;
{
nsAutoLock lock(mLock);
if (mFD) {
@ -1627,7 +1633,7 @@ nsSocketTransport::OnSocketDetached(PRFileDesc *fd)
// round. That would lead e.g. to a broken certificate exception page.
if (NS_FAILED(mCondition)) {
mCallbacks = nsnull;
mEventSink = nsnull;
mEventSink.swap(ourEventSink);
}
}
}