From db92a9fe937a389c1dab3d020ee5b234795bf0ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "pschwartau%netscape.com" Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 01:34:07 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Correcting a mistaken comment. --- js/tests/js1_5/Regress/regress-103602.js | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/js/tests/js1_5/Regress/regress-103602.js b/js/tests/js1_5/Regress/regress-103602.js index 0fee1d94a1f2..ab8113d257f7 100644 --- a/js/tests/js1_5/Regress/regress-103602.js +++ b/js/tests/js1_5/Regress/regress-103602.js @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ * * * Date: 10 Jan 2002 -* SUMMARY: Assignment to a const is NOT an error per ECMA +* SUMMARY: Reassignment to a const is NOT an error per ECMA * See http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103602 * * ------- Additional Comment #4 From Brendan Eich 2002-01-10 15:30 ------- @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ //----------------------------------------------------------------------------- var UBound = 0; var bug = 103602; -var summary = 'Assignment to a const is NOT an error per ECMA' +var summary = 'Reassignment to a const is NOT an error per ECMA'; var status = ''; var statusitems = []; var actual = ''; @@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ catch(e) } - status = inSection(1); try {