We'll start to dispatch keydown event and keyup event even during composition.
So, for testing those events won't break our UI, we should make
EventUtils.synhtesizeComposition() and EventUtils.synthesizeCompositionChange()
dispatch keydown event and keyup event even if callers don't specify keyboard
event explicitly.
Typically, "keydown" event is marked as "processed by IME", i.e., keyCode
value is set to DOM_VK_PROCESSKEY and key is set to "Process", with our
widget which handles native IME and key input. On the other hand, "keyup"
is NOT marked as so.
Therefore, this patch makes TextInputProcessor emulates this behavior without
any new special flags. And for making possible to emulate special cases,
this patch adds two flags to nsITextInputProcessor. One is
KEY_DONT_MARK_KEYDOWN_AS_PROCESSED. The other is KEY_MARK_KEYUP_AS_PROCESSED.
Unfortunately, those flags have opposite meaning but this must be better than
making necessary to one flag for emulating usual keydown/keyup events.
Finally, this makes some tests specify better keyboard information to
synthesizeComposition() and synthesizeCompositionChange() to emulate
actual keyboard events during composition.
MozReview-Commit-ID: ItYaXILkNQE
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : e50cc77c1efbc12686d7ea334d41926c7392b30d
Except table access and XPCOM methods for c-c, tests and etc, we can remove
more nsIDOMElement usages to avoid QI.
MozReview-Commit-ID: HO5kAaZAs6Q
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 41ede0bace33504ad852dc4e0016ea346cd7bdee
Before bug 1413181, HTMLEditRules::SplitMailCites() receives left node of
split node with |leftCite| from SplitNodeDeep(). However, the out argument
was removed by the bug and now, it can be retrieved with
SplitNodeResult::GetPreviousNode(). Its result is used for creating <br>
element etc, but not set to |leftCite| but HTMLEditRules::SplitMailCites()
still checks if |leftCite| is empty to remove it from the DOM tree.
So, now, both |leftCite| and |rightCite| are not necessary and
HTMLEditRules::SplitMailCites() should use |previousNodeOfSplitPoint|
instead of |leftCite|.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 408MJt6X1IV
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : fa6095ccc972d33afe8deb0f124adffea7371f4e
EditorBase::GetStartNodeAndOffset() and EditorBase::GetEndNodeAndOffset() are
just wrappers of EditorBase::GetStartPoint() and EditorBase::GetEndPoint().
They may *compute* offset in the container node even if some callers don't
need the offset. Therefore, we should get rid of them and make all callers
use EditorBase::GetStartPoint() or EditorBase::GetEndPoint() directly.
Note that EditorBase::GetStartNodeAndOffset() and
EditorBase::GetEndNodeAndOffset() returns NS_ERROR_FAILURE if
EditorBase::GetStartPoint() or EditorBase::GetEndPoint() returns not set point.
Therefore, checking the result is set equals checking the old nsresult as
an error.
MozReview-Commit-ID: JLwqRMFLjHC
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 0eb6bf4ba80e8139c6b9f36723d77d23f2b9099e
There are 2 callers of TextEditRules::CheckBidiLevelForDeletion(). One of them
will start to use EditorRawDOMPoint. Therefore, making it take
|const EditorRawDOMPoint&| instead of |nsINode*| and offset in it keeps the
caller simpler.
MozReview-Commit-ID: DRJXo8gnzba
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : a64d1033699245f54a8f8e6a9b93457e12f33e6c
Similar to the constructor of WSRunObject, PriorVisibleNode() and
NextVisibleNode() callers may become ugly if the callers start to use
Editor(Raw)DOMPoint. So, let's make them take Editor(Raw)DOMPoint instead of
a pair of nsINode* and offset in it.
Note that a lot of callers of them already use Editor(Raw)DOMPoint. So, we
don't need to keep maintain overloads which takes nsINode* and offset in it
directly.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3avMtL000nd
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : f8c83e2fabeb5a94a1729c626583a6699636b06c
The following patches make some WSRunObject users use EditorRawDOMPoint or
EditorDOMPoint instead of a pair of nsINode and offset in it. Then, the
code becomes too long like:
> WSRunObject object(mHTMLEditor, pointToDoSomething.GetContainer(),
> pointToDoSomething.Offset());
This is ugly and not easier to read than:
> WSRunObject object(mHTMLEditor, pointToDoSomething);
So, we should create alternative constructor of WSRunObject first.
MozReview-Commit-ID: GiNWRBLl7zB
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 8616956b9745db130283a4bdbd82155b1cfb2803
Editor(Raw)DOMPoint::IsEndOfContainer() checks mIsChildInitialized before
referring mChild. However, it may be true even if mParent is not a container
node like a text node. Therefore, if mParent is a text node and
mIsChildInitialized is true, it always returns true (i.e., even if mOffset
isn't same as length of mParent).
This patch makes it check mParent->IsContainerNode() before checking
mIsChildInitialized because after checking mIsChildInitialized, it validates
the relation of the members. So, this keeps the validation simple.
MozReview-Commit-ID: K2XrAZoNv2I
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : cba8190f199ab2e9d99547948ab50f0cc8c8ff88
We only use it for properties that return pixels anyway, so we can use it
without much problem.
This also fixes bug 1428974.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 5BbVOUdQT7o
It is unnecessary to use already_AddRefed for GetDocument and GetPresShell.
Then, if we remove already_AddRefed, we can replace this with const method.
MozReview-Commit-ID: KTVS0rYrY2i
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 0199026410fc674f112c960b599a09bc7906cf85
Currently, HTMLEditor doesn't initialize caret position when it gets focus by
itself in most cases. Only when it's in designMode, it may move caret to the
first visible (not checking CSS actually).
In most cases, caret position is adjusted when EditorBase::InitializeSelection()
calls Selection::SetAncestorLimiter(). If selected range is outside of
new limiter, it moves caret to start of the new limiter. However, this is
really different behavior from the other browsers. The other browsers try
to move caret to the first editable text node or before the first editable
content such as <img>, <input>, etc.
This difference causes a serious incompatible issue with Draft.js. It doesn't
initialize caret position when it gets focus but it assumes that caret is
always set to before <br> element if there is no other content.
So, let's try to behave as what other browsers do as far as possible.
This patch makes editor behave as:
* if selection is already in the editing host except start of the editing host,
does nothing.
* if there is non-editable element before any editable node, move caret to
start of the editing host.
* if there is editable text node or element node which cannot have a text node,
move its start or before it.
* if there is no editable nodes which can contain text nodes, move caret to
start of the editing host.
Note that before applying this patch, in designMode, BeginningOfDocument() used
document element instead of <body> element. Therefore, it may set odd position
if <head> element has some text nodes with <script> or <style>. However,
this doesn't make sense and for making more consistent behavior between
designMode and contenteditable, this patch makes it use editing host (it's
<body> element if it's in designMode).
MozReview-Commit-ID: 5neYoTMq6Cc
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : c4d06b6864a221d7cd2833a007d73f7d67821e95
To get a rid of some methods, I would like to replace nsIDOMNode usages with nsINode.
MozReview-Commit-ID: B0FVczayND0
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : ede058089332202ba0c05ddb61e0f119cbf52fcb
Everyone calls them with the shell of the current composed document, and this
allows the multi-presShell stuff to just be in UpdateCurrentStyleSources /
DoGetStyleContextNoFlush.
The only reason we need to use OwnerDoc()->GetShell() instead of the composed
doc in GetStyleContext / GetStyleContextNoFlush is Element::GetBindingURL, which
does expect to get the binding URL for stuff outside of the composed doc (and
changing that gave me a useless browser).
That's technically a behavior change on the cases that used to pass nullptr, but
I think all callers are fine with that. I could also just add a special function
for that particular case, it may be worth it.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2XlnkgdgDCK
maxTextLength is unused from script, so I would like to move to TextEditor.
Also, there is no reason to keep setText on nsIPlainText.
MozReview-Commit-ID: CZ8pa9Pm8qt
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : ea58a20510b2211dcf440955ec8dc49d57337437
Note that this patch also replaces legacy VK_* with KEY_*, and replaces
synthesizeKey() for inputting some characters with sendString() because
it's better and clearer what it does and it sets shiftKey state properly.
MozReview-Commit-ID: De4enbjux3T
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 2296b84bff8e22f01eeb48cd8614fac5db11136a
HTMLEditRules::WillInsertBreak() started to use HTMLEditRules::MakeBasicBlock()
to wrap existing inline elements with default paragraph separator if inline
elements are children of editing host. However,
HTMLEditRules::ApplyBlockStyle() called by HTMLEditRules::MakeBasicBlock() sets
mNewNode to last new block node. So, if it wraps inline elements after caret
position, mNewNode becomes after expected caret position and
HTMLEditRules::AfterEditInner() will move caret into it.
This patch make HTMLEditRules::WillInsertBreak() reset mNewNode with
caret position after calling HTMLEditRules::MakeBasicBlock().
Additionally, this patch fixes a bug of HTMLEditor::IsVisibleBRElement().
That is, it uses only editable nodes to check if given <br> element is
visible. However, editable state is not related to this check. If <br>
element is followed by non-editable inline node (except invisible data
nodes), it always visible. This bug caused getting wrong nodes with
HTMLEditRules::GetNodesFromSelection() which is used by
HTMLEditRules::MakeBasicBlock(). Therefore, this patch also adds lots of
EditorBase::Get(Next|Previous)ElementOrText*() and
HTMLEditor::Get(Next|Previous)HTMLElementOrText*() to ignore only invisible
data nodes.
Note that even with this fix, the range of nodes computed by
HTMLEditRules::GetNodesFromSelection() is still odd if only non-editable
elements follow a <br> node which is first <br> element after the caret
position. However, what is expected by the execCommand spec is unclear.
So, automated test added by this patch checks current inconsistent behavior
for now.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2m52StwoEEH
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 6b9b2338e35c4d2e89a405fd8e1ffc7b0873ca1e
Now, callers of EventUtils.synthesizeKey() don't need to specify
KeyboardEvent.code value anymore if they assume that active keyboard layout
is US keyboard layout.
Note that this patch changes the meaning of only test_bug551434.html.
Some callers in it don't match the key value and code value but that looks
like that they don't checking such odd keyboard events. So, they must be
bug of the test.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Itxo7yZ9rkK
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 856ef3715c924ca16e993ea57d92d1243b5cc6be
EditorBase::JoinNodeDeep() returns a DOM point which was start of right node.
Currently, this is set before actually joining the nodes. Therefore, we see
warnings since right node which becomes joined node may have less children
than left node.
This patch also makes the NS_WARNING_ASSERTION to NS_ASSERTION since no tests
hit this. So, we can use it to detect regressions.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3RmRP588AkF
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 2cab458ffac566c81eb8d3f47e755ffacb1553d2
This patch only fixes warning, not changing actual behavior of editor.
HTMLEditRules::ReturnInParagraph() splits paragraph *around* given point.
Therefore, from point of view of caller, offset of setting point may be
invalid after HTMLEditRules::ReturnInParagraph() handled the edit action.
In this case, invalidating stored child of the point may cause warning
since offset may be larger than length of its container.
So, if HTMLEditRules::ReturnInParagraph() handles the edit action,
the caller, HTMLEditRules::WillInsertBreak(), should cancel invalidating
the stored child for avoiding unnecessary warning.
MozReview-Commit-ID: DKJlr0Awwlo
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 8fbefff3b46e55daf8db6342f00de904315d7fcc
Since We can use EditorBase/TextEditor/HTMLEditor directly, we can
movei noscript methods in nsIEditor to each class.
Also, Init is unnecessary to use nsIDOMDocument and nsIContent since method
isn't in IDL. And some methods are unused now.
MozReview-Commit-ID: D3B6oSlcT0L
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 6cab2e6e7b4ba8cfb56d8320be24ca4afcbe55fb
extra : amend_source : 1d8c59086a9158a49dd270b64ecf8341ed4002ce
Before bug 1425091, we called RangeUpdater::SelAdjCreateNode() with point of
new node in EditorBase::CreateElement(). However, it was accidentally changed
to point *in* new element. Therefore, setting such DOM point causes warnings
in debug build and call of RangeUpdater::SelAdjCreateNode() must be failed
since the point stores wrong container node.
Additionally, this patch stops using another EditorRawDOMPoint instance which
is just redundant and renames |ret| to |newElement| for making its meaning
clearer.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Gc0YgaNLYcx
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : c2fbe2669ca8a5993e26b357f53dc38341fd6bf6
Since We can use EditorBase/TextEditor/HTMLEditor directly, we can
movei noscript methods in nsIEditor to each class.
Also, Init is unnecessary to use nsIDOMDocument and nsIContent since method
isn't in IDL. And some methods are unused now.
MozReview-Commit-ID: D3B6oSlcT0L
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : b89698f4ab56fdd97a4cd8c515a8b33f6a74a7af
This patch was autogenerated by my decomponents.py
It covers almost every file with the extension js, jsm, html, py,
xhtml, or xul.
It removes blank lines after removed lines, when the removed lines are
preceded by either blank lines or the start of a new block. The "start
of a new block" is defined fairly hackily: either the line starts with
//, ends with */, ends with {, <
arthur.iakab
Masayuki Nakano
Makoto Kato
Gurzau Raul
Sylvestre Ledru
Boris Zbarsky
Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Tiberius Oros
Olli Pettay
Sebastian Hengst
Florian Quèze
Dorel Luca
Adrian Wielgosik
Hiroyuki Ikezoe
shindli
Ciure Andrei
Andrew McCreight
Narcis Beleuzu
Eric Rahm
Cameron McCormack
Kris Maglione
Cosmin Sabou
Brindusan Cristian
Masatoshi Kimura