We basically use a couple primitives to draw these
(PaintRoundedRectWithRadius, FillRect), so making the code a bit generic
implementing stuff with WebRender seems straight-forward.
I've kept using the fallback codepath for the bits that draw complex
paths like arrows and such, but the rest of the things should work with
this patch.
A thing I'm not too happy about is the scrollbar painting setup (requires a lot
of boilerplate), but modulo template hacks make nsNativeBasicTheme a template
that receives its super class as a parameter or something) it seems hard to do
better.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D105931
We basically use a couple primitives to draw these
(PaintRoundedRectWithRadius, FillRect), so making the code a bit generic
implementing stuff with WebRender seems straight-forward.
I've kept using the fallback codepath for the bits that draw complex
paths like arrows and such, but the rest of the things should work with
this patch.
A thing I'm not too happy about is the scrollbar painting setup (requires a lot
of boilerplate), but modulo template hacks make nsNativeBasicTheme a template
that receives its super class as a parameter or something) it seems hard to do
better.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D105931
We basically use a couple primitives to draw these
(PaintRoundedRectWithRadius, FillRect), so making the code a bit generic
implementing stuff with WebRender seems straight-forward.
I've kept using the fallback codepath for the bits that draw complex
paths like arrows and such, but the rest of the things should work with
this patch.
A thing I'm not too happy about is the scrollbar painting setup (requires a lot
of boilerplate), but modulo template hacks make nsNativeBasicTheme a template
that receives its super class as a parameter or something) it seems hard to do
better.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D105931
This removes the CoreUI draw calls for scrollbars.
We already have code to manually draw scrollbars, which is used to support the
scrollbar-color CSS property. But this code was only used for non-overlay
scrollbars in the past, because scrollbar-color only affects non-overlay scrollbars.
This patch adjusts that custom drawing code to work for overlay scrollbars as well.
It computes the correct sizes, positions, and colors, to match native scrollbars.
The scrollbar track drawing code is changed from "background fill with strokes on
top" to "multiple adjacent non-overlapping filled rectangle segments" so that it
works better with translucent track colors.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D93715
The default drawing codepath requests the OS to draw it, but the OS seems to
ignore the scaling factor of the transform. So when drawing scrollbars after
APZ-zooming, the scrollthumbs appear abnormally thin. This patch forces us into
the custom drawing codepath which gets scaled properly.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D92677
add fuzzy-if statements to allow reftests to run on new windows10 AMI image
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D12553
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch was written entirely by the following script:
#!/bin/bash
if [ ! -d "./.hg" ]
then
echo "Not in a source tree." 1>&2
exit 1
fi
find . -regex '.*\(ref\|crash\)test.*\.list' | while read FILENAME
do
echo "Processing ${FILENAME}."
# The following has four substitutions:
# * The first one replaces the *first* argument to fuzzy() when it doesn't
# have a - in it, by replacing it with an explicit 0-N range.
# * The second one does the same for the *second* argument to fuzzy().
# * The third does the same for the *second* argument to fuzzy-if().
# * The fourth does the same for the *third* argument to fuzzy-if().
#
# Note that this is using perl rather than sed because perl doesn't
# support non-greedy matching, which is needed for the first argument to
# fuzzy-if.
perl -pi -e 's/(fuzzy\()([^ ,()-]*)(,[^ ,()]*\))/${1}0-${2}${3}/g;s/(fuzzy\([^ ,()]*,)([^ ,()-]*)(\))/${1}0-${2}${3}/g;s/(fuzzy-if\([^ ]*?,)([^ ,()-]*)(,[^ ,()]*\))/${1}0-${2}${3}/g;s/(fuzzy-if\([^ ]*?,[^ ,()]*,)([^ ,()-]*)(\))/${1}0-${2}${3}/g' "${FILENAME}"
done
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2974
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
The ceiling was introduced in bug 549190 for improve the consistency of
underline positioning. However, removing ceiling now doesn't seem to
regress the testcases in that bug, probably thanks to improvement in
other part.
The ceiling here causes us to have different font metrics than other
browsers on Windows, and can lead to webcompat issue. We also don't do
this for other backends. So it's probably better removing it in favor
of rounding.
There are several test changes:
* min-intrinsic-with-percents-across-elements.html changes result due to
height of wrapping div in reference page depends on line height, so a
fixed line height is set to work around the issue.
* 368020-1.html changes result because a slightly different line-height
triggers bug 1462514. It is changed to use fixed line-height to work
around the issue.
* 456147.xul is disabled because it compares XUL against HTML page, but
XUL has different approach to position text in its elements than HTML.
Specifically, XUL elements don't seem to respect line height while
HTML elements do. The original line height in the file was probably
chosen to make the HTML match XUL, so it seems to be non-trivial to
fix it in a platform-independent way.
* sizing-orthog-{vlr,vrl}-in-htb-{008,020}.xht fails due to text in <p>
after the testing block shifts 1px up for unknown reason.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2WJG1AigWl1
--HG--
extra : source : 653c6b7480997c4e1dbead5f0441bc06a0605b7a
The ceiling was introduced in bug 549190 for improve the consistency of
underline positioning. However, removing ceiling now doesn't seem to
regress the testcases in that bug, probably thanks to improvement in
other part.
The ceiling here causes us to have different font metrics than other
browsers on Windows, and can lead to webcompat issue. We also don't do
this for other backends. So it's probably better removing it in favor
of rounding.
There are several test changes:
* min-intrinsic-with-percents-across-elements.html changes result due to
height of wrapping div in reference page depends on line height, so a
fixed line height is set to work around the issue.
* 368020-1.html changes result because a slightly different line-height
triggers bug 1462514. It is changed to use fixed line-height to work
around the issue.
* 456147.xul is disabled because it compares XUL against HTML page, but
XUL has different approach to position text in its elements than HTML.
Specifically, XUL elements don't seem to respect line height while
HTML elements do. The original line height in the file was probably
chosen to make the HTML match XUL, so it seems to be non-trivial to
fix it in a platform-independent way.
* sizing-orthog-{vlr,vrl}-in-htb-{008,020}.xht fails due to text in <p>
after the testing block shifts 1px up for unknown reason.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2WJG1AigWl1
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 540e68ffff618a6dc3c14b3702b2c042988061a3
The ceiling was introduced in bug 549190 for improve the consistency of
underline positioning. However, removing ceiling now doesn't seem to
regress the testcases in that bug, probably thanks to improvement in
other part.
The ceiling here causes us to have different font metrics than other
browsers on Windows, and can lead to webcompat issue. We also don't do
this for other backends. So it's probably better removing it in favor
of rounding.
There are several test changes:
* min-intrinsic-with-percents-across-elements.html changes result due to
height of wrapping div in reference page depends on line height, so a
fixed line height is set to work around the issue.
* 368020-1.html changes result because a slightly different line-height
triggers bug 1462514. It is changed to use fixed line-height to work
around the issue.
* 456147.xul is disabled because it compares XUL against HTML page, but
XUL has different approach to position text in its elements than HTML.
Specifically, XUL elements don't seem to respect line height while
HTML elements do. The original line height in the file was probably
chosen to make the HTML match XUL, so it seems to be non-trivial to
fix it in a platform-independent way.
* sizing-orthog-{vlr,vrl}-in-htb-{008,020}.xht fails due to text in <p>
after the testing block shifts 1px up for unknown reason.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2WJG1AigWl1
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 6c61fa95a3b01e7b439be46a2498b4f893d8b84b
Many of these could probably be fuzzed but in the interests of getting
the reftest suite turned on sooner I'm doing a blanket fails-if. This
covers all the reftests where there is more fuzz with webrender on
windows than any of existing annotations account for. In some cases the
fuzz is only a few pixels more than the equivalent Linux fuzz already
annotated, but I'll clean that up in a future bug.
MozReview-Commit-ID: IaKarbnL46d
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 71889340305b0b12fa8eace722e42bb3faf14419
Jonathan Kew
Cristian Tuns
Emilio Cobos Álvarez
smolnar
Stephen A Pohl
Cameron McCormack
Noemi Erli
Markus Stange
Kartikaya Gupta
Andrew Osmond
Andreea Pavel
Joel Maher
Mats Palmgren
Andrew Swan
L. David Baron
Xidorn Quan
Carsten "Tomcat" Book
Shing Lyu
Sebastian Hengst
Jeremy Chen