Use counter submission normally happens at document destruction. For
testing use counters, however, we need to have use counters updated in
telemetry at deterministic points. Therefore, we provide a method on
nsIDOMWindowUtils that forces use counters out to telemetry so we can
examine them.
The only logic change is that we now call UpdateCaret() before
dispatching CaretStateChangedEvent.
This resolves a bug that the text selection dialog flashes when long
tapping on an empty content.
--HG--
extra : commitid : JHAxvifqpZS
extra : rebase_source : 9ae578f616eedc939839bc056c5437a84e8fedea
There's a bug that when a frame is focusable but not selectable, we
won't focus on it because we call IsSelectable() before ChangeFocus().
By moving the check into SelectWord(), we'll have a chance to focus on
it.
This resolves a issue that when long press to select a word on a new
opened app, the selection highlight is gray instead of blue.
--HG--
extra : commitid : Fmupbt6gIQ9
extra : rebase_source : 0c427bf767c9d44e9467469e929f27e743e7d013
We want the focus changing behavior by long tap as close as to the one
by single tap.
The only functional change is that we always clear old focus and
re-focus the window if a focusable frame cannot be found. This behavior
is the same as the single tap implemented in
EventStateManager::PostHandleEvent().
Besides, ChangeFocus now returns the new focusable frame instead of bool
which provides more information.
--HG--
extra : commitid : 3y2smyRZQCW
extra : rebase_source : 36e7b65cf67f3148ea24668eef7078ee4daadb3c
This make it easier to print a frame tag name in one debug log line.
--HG--
extra : commitid : 5bl8GhmTLQi
extra : rebase_source : f151c98dc99c33e8050b106ab8695a9053dbb3ad
When updating the cascade results between transitions and animations, if we
detect a change we force an update by taking the following steps:
a. Updating the animation generation on the restyle manager
b. Updating the animation generation on the collection
c. Iterating over all the properties animated by the collection and, for
each property that we can animate on the compositor, posting a restyle
event with the appropriate change hint (nsChangeHint_UpdateTransformLayer
or nsChangeHint_UpdateTransformOpacity)
d. Marking the collection as needing refreshes
e. Clearing the style rule refresh time so we generate a new style rule in
EnsureStyleRuleFor
As it turns out, the newly-added
AnimationCollection::RequestRestyle(RestyleType::Layer) already performs a, b,
d, and e. It also:
* Ensures we are observing the refresh driver if need be (should have no effect
in this case)
* Clears the last animation style update time on the pres context so that
subsequent calls to FlushPendingNotifications will update animation style
(it seems like we probably should have been doing this for changes to cascade
results anyway)
* Posts a restyle event with restyle hint eRestyle_CSSTransitions or
eRestyle_CSSAnimations
* Marks the document as needing a style flush (irrelevant since posting
a restyle event does this anyway)
The only missing piece that would prevent using RequestRestyle in place of this
code when updating cascade results is (c) from the list above. However, (c)
should not be necessary since ElementRestyler::AddLayerChangesForAnimation()
explicitly checks for out-of-date layer animation generation numbers and adds
the appropriate change hints (nsChangeHint_UpdateTransformLayer etc.) to the
change list.
We currently have a series of methods that clobber various bits of animation
state to force animations on layers to be updated. This aligns closely with
the restyle code introduced in this patch series.
By re-using RequestRestyle when updating animations on layers, not only should
we be able to simplify the code somewhat but, in future, we should also be able
to have Animation objects use the same mechanism to update layers during
a regular tick.
For example, currently we have a bug where when an animation starts after
a delay with the same value as the backwards fill then we don't send the
animation to the compositor right away (see
https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/d6ea652c579992daa9041cc9718bb7c6abefbc91/layout/style/test/test_animations_omta.html#287).
By adding this Restyle::Layer value we should be able to fix that in future.
EnsureStyleRuleFor contains logic for performing throttled updates to the style
rule but it is only used in one case: inside
nsTransitionManager::UpdateCascadeResults to determine what properties are
being animated by CSS animations.
We would like to remove throttling logic from EnsureStyleRuleFor altogether but
if that one case where it is currently used is run on every tick then removing
this logic could effectively mean we end up updating the style rule on every
tick. Fortunately nsTransitionManager::UpdateCascadeResults is only called
in the following cases:
1. From nsTransitionManager::StyleContextChanged (via
TransitionManager::UpdateCascadeResultsWithTransitions), when we are
processing style changes for transitions.
2. From AnimationCollection::EnsureStyleRuleFor (via
nsAnimationManager::MaybeUpdateCascadeResults and
nsTransitionManager::UpdateCascadeResultsWithAnimations), when we are
updating the animation style rule from CSS animations.
3. From nsAnimationManager::CheckAnimationRule (via
TransitionManager::UpdateCascadeResultsWithAnimationsToBeDestroyed), when
we are processing style changes for CSS animations.
None of these things should be happenning on a regular throttle-able tick so by
removing this logic we shouldn't be causing any additional work.
I have verified, using a test case that combines transitions and animations on
the same property, that we have the same behavior with regard to calling
EnsureStyleRuleFor both before and after this patch (specifically we avoid
calling it altogether while running only the transition but when the animation
starts and clobbers the transition we end up calling EnsureStyleRuleFor once on
each tick).
In preparation for ultimately being able to run animations without a manager,
this patch moves the request restyle code from FlushAnimations to
Animation::Tick. (Ultimately most of this functionality should move to the
KeyframeEffect but for now Animation is fine.)
We want to move the newly-introduced RequestRestyle call from FlushAnimations
to Animation::Tick. However, nsAnimationManager::CheckAnimationRule calls
Animation::Tick so this would cause us to start posting animation restyles
within a restyle.
Typically, Animations have an effect (currently there is only one type of
effect: KeyframeEffectReadOnly) and when there is any change in timing they
pass it down to their effect. However, the Animation is dependent on the
duration of the effect for determining if it is "finished" or not. As a result,
when an effect's timing changes, the owning Animation needs to know.
(The way this *should* work is that effects should tell their animation or
trigger some chain of events that causes animation's to update themselves.
However, the current implementation of effects is fairly primitive and does
not do this or even have a reference to the owning Animation. When we
implement the script API for updating the timing properties of effects we will
have to fix this but for now it is up to code in layout/style to update the
Animation when it touches the corresponding effect's timing.)
nsAnimationManager::CheckAnimationRule currently does this by calling
Animation::Tick() which ensures the Animation's finished state is updated
accordingly.
Ultimately we want to ensure that Animation::Tick is called exactly once per
frame (and at the appropriate point in that frame) so we'd like to remove this
call from CheckAnimationRule.
This patch achieves that by:
* Making Animation::SetEffect update the animation's timing - this is necessary
for animations that are created by CheckAnimationRule and will be
necessary when once we make Animation.effect writeable from script anyway.
* Calling Animation::SetEffect even for the case when we are updating the
existing effect.
Another side-effect of calling Animation::Tick within
nsAnimationManager::CheckAnimationRule is that CSSAnimation::Tick queues
events. There are some tests (e.g. layout/style/test/test_animations.html) that
assume that animationstart events are dispatched immediately when new
animations are created. That will change with bug 1134163 but for now we
should maintain this existing behavior since changing this might introduce
compatibility issues that are best dealt with as a separate bug rather than
blocking this refactoring. To that end, this patch also explicitly queues
animationstart events for newly-created animations.
nsTransitionManager::WillRefresh and nsAnimationManager::WillRefresh are now
identical and all methods they call exist on CommonAnimationManager so we
can unify them there.
The implementations of FlushAnimations and FlushTransitions should now be all
but equivalent so this patch combines them into a single implementation on
CommonAnimationManager.
Regarding some of the minor differences between the two methods:
* The combined implementation drops the check for an empty list of collections
found only in FlushTransitions. This seems like a very minor optimization
that could possibly cause us to fail to unregister from the refresh driver
if we forgot to do so when removing the last collection.
* The combined implementation uses the loop implementation from FlushAnimations
since it is more compact.
This patch also removes the extra nested scope since it doesn't seem necessary.
There are a couple of assertions that only exist in FlushTransitions (and not
FlushAnimations). This patch moves them to RequestRestyle since they appear to
apply to either transitions or animations equally. By eliminating this
difference between FlushTransitions and FlushAnimations we should then be
in a position to combine them into a common method on the base class.
This patch moves the additional checks (beyond those of Animation::CanThrottle)
from FlushAnimations/FlushTransitions to AnimationCollection::RequestRestyle.
These checks are on a per-collection basis hence it makes sense for the
collection to perform them. This also moves logic out of the managers which is
needed if we want to support script-based animations without introducing another
manager.
Ultimately we want to move throttling logic to AnimationCollection and
Animation::Tick (and later to KeyframeEffect::SetParentTime). This is so that
we can support script-generated animations without having to introduce yet
another manager.
To that end this patch introduces a method on AnimationCollection that can be
called from Animation::Tick to perform the necessary notifications needed to
update style.
Later in this patch series we will extend RequestRestyle to incorporate more of
the throttling logic and further extend it to cover some of the other
notifications such as updating layers.
This patch tracks whether or not we have already posted a restyle for animation
to avoid making redundant calls. Calls to nsIDocument::SetNeedStyleFlush are
cheap and more difficult to detect when they have completed so we don't filter
redundant calls in the Restyle::Throttled case.
If mHasPendingAnimationRestyle is set and AnimationCommon::EnsureStyleRuleFor
is *never* called then we could arrive at situation where we fail to make post
further restyles for animation.
I have verified that if we fail to reset mHasPendingAnimationRestyle at the
appropriate point (e.g. resetting it at the end of EnsureStyleRuleFor *after*
the early-returns) then a number of existing tests fail.
Furthermore, I have observed that it is reset by the beginning of each tick
in almost every case except for a few instances of browser mochitests such as
browser/components/customizableui/test/browser_1007336_lwthemes_in_customize_mode.js.
In this case, during the async cleanup of the test, we have an opacity
transition on a vbox element that becomes display:none and appears to be skipped
during restyling. However, even in this case, EnsureStyleRuleFor is called
within one or at most two ticks and mHasPendingAnimationRestyle flag is cleared
(i.e. it does not get stuck).
In FlushTransitions and FlushAnimations we use different mechanisms to see if a
transition/animation can be throttled on the current tick.
FlushTransitions calls Animation::CanThrottle whilst FlushAnimations calls
EnsureStyleRuleFor and checks if the rule has changed or not. These are not as
completely different as they might seem at first since, internally,
EnsureStyleRuleFor calls Animation::CanThrottle.
We would like to unify this behavior and simply use Animation::CanThrottle in
FlushAnimations as we do in FlushTransitions.
First, however, we have to account for the differences in these approaches:
1. Using the result of EnsureStyleRuleFor means we may *not* call
PostRestyleForAnimation if an animation collection's mNeedsRefreshes member
is false.
This member is false when all animations have finished (or there are no
animations in the collection). In this case EnsureStyleRuleFor will not
update the style rule and we will end up assuming the tick can be throttled.
*However*, in the case that all animations are finished
Animation::CanThrottle will *also* return true (technically it will return
false until we compose style for the first time after becoming finished but
beyond that one moment it will return true) so skipping this check by using
Animation::CanThrottle instead of EnsureStyleRuleFor should not
make a significant difference.
2. Using the result of EnsureStyleRuleFor will mean that if we have already
updated the style rule within a given tick we will avoid calling
PostRestyleForAnimation (and call SetNeedStyleFlush instead). This can
happen the first time we call FlushAnimations from
PresShell::FlushPendingNotifications. (When we call FlushAnimations from
nsAnimationManager::WillRefresh mStyleRuleRefreshTime will be stale and we
won't apply this optimization. Furthermore after the first call to
PresShell::FlushPendingNotifications we will typically skip calling
FlushAnimations since PresShell::StyleUpdateForAllAnimationsIsUpToDate will
typically return true).
This seems like a possibly useful optimization although it is surprising we
don't do the same for transitions. Note that this optimization applies
regardless of whether we are performing a throttleable flush or not. That is,
even if we pass CommonAnimationManager::Cannot_Throttle we will still end up
throttling the tick in this case. Furthermore, we will mark the document as
needing a style flush even though this does not appear to be necessary.
This patch copies this optimization (checking if mStyleRuleRefreshTime) to
FlushAnimations so we can maintain this behavior when calling
Animation::CanThrottle instead of EnsureStyleRuleFor. It also applies the
same behavior to FlushTransitions for consistency (and so we can later
combine FlushAnimations and FlushTransitions).
Note that we apply this optimization *before* calling Tick since it should
only apply once we have already Tick'ed the animations in the collection.
We will first hit FlushAnimations as a result of the refresh driver calling
nsAnimationManager/nsTransitionManager::WillRefresh at which point
mStyleRuleRefreshTime should be stale. Using this order not only saves
redundant work but also makes moving the restyle code to Animation later on
more straightforward.
(In future we will divorce WillRefresh and FlushAnimations and only call
Tick in WillRefresh and only perform this optimization FlushAnimations.)
3. Using the result of EnsureStyleRuleFor means that while checking if we can
throttle or not we also update the style rule in FlushAnimations. That seems
like an odd side-effect particularly since FlushTransitions doesn't do the
same thing.
There is no longer anything in FlushTransitions that modifies the set of
transitions. I believe this changed as of bug 960465, specifically changeset
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/b2ee72589c18, so that this code is
no longer needed.
By removing this we can further align FlushAnimations and FlushTransitions.
If the timer is not launched when the content is empty, the first caret
will always has Appearance::NormalNotShown, which is not consistent with
the behavior when the caret is shown when the content is not empty.
After this patch, Gaia will always receive an update event after 3
seconds timeout. Hence fixed a bug that the shortcut text dialog does
not hide after 3 seconds timeout.
--HG--
extra : commitid : BwUbPSfjZs2
This isn't actually needed for the only caller (which ensures that
frames with will-change: opacity create a stacking context), since
nsIFrame::BuildDisplayListForChild checks HasOpacity, which checks for
NS_STYLE_WILL_CHANGE_OPACITY. However, it's good to have the bit set
for consistency in case we use it elsewhere.
--HG--
extra : commitid : 2mKHVXRkjZL
This is motivated by three separate but related problems:
1. Our concept of recursion depth is broken for things that run from AfterProcessNextEvent observers (e.g. Promises). We decrement the recursionDepth counter before firing observers, so a Promise callback running at the lowest event loop depth has a recursion depth of 0 (whereas a regular nsIRunnable would be 1). This is a problem because it's impossible to distinguish a Promise running after a sync XHR's onreadystatechange handler from a top-level event (since the former runs with depth 2 - 1 = 1, and the latter runs with just 1).
2. The nsIThreadObserver mechanism that is used by a lot of code to run "after" the current event is a poor fit for anything that runs script. First, the order the observers fire in is the order they were added, not anything fixed by spec. Additionally, running script can cause the event loop to spin, which is a big source of pain here (bholley has some nasty bug caused by this).
3. We run Promises from different points in the code for workers and main thread. The latter runs from XPConnect's nsIThreadObserver callbacks, while the former runs from a hardcoded call to run Promises in the worker event loop. What workers do is particularly problematic because it means we can't get the right recursion depth no matter what we do to nsThread.
The solve this, this patch does the following:
1. Consolidate some handling of microtasks and all handling of stable state from appshell and WorkerPrivate into CycleCollectedJSRuntime.
2. Make the recursionDepth counter only available to CycleCollectedJSRuntime (and its consumers) and remove it from the nsIThreadInternal and nsIThreadObserver APIs.
3. Adjust the recursionDepth counter so that microtasks run with the recursionDepth of the task they are associated with.
4. Introduce the concept of metastable state to replace appshell's RunBeforeNextEvent. Metastable state is reached after every microtask or task is completed. This provides the semantics that bent and I want for IndexedDB, where transactions autocommit at the end of a microtask and do not "spill" from one microtask into a subsequent microtask. This differs from appshell's RunBeforeNextEvent in two ways:
a) It fires between microtasks, which was the motivation for starting this.
b) It no longer ensures that we're at the same event loop depth in the native event queue. bent decided we don't care about this.
5. Reorder stable state to happen after microtasks such as Promises, per HTML. Right now we call the regular thread observers, including appshell, before the main thread observer (XPConnect), so stable state tasks happen before microtasks.
With APZ enabled, these tests activate scrollframes (by scrolling them) in the
test pages but not the reference pages. This causes differences in layerization
which causes reftests to fail by a few pixel differences in the scrollbars. By
making the scrollboxes will-change:scroll-position both the test and reference
pages have activated scrollframes, and so the layerization is the same in both.
--HG--
extra : commitid : BafhIev6bT
This patch updates the logic in nsTransitionManager::FlushTransitions that deals
with detecting newly-started (i.e. when the delay phase has just finished) or
newly-finished animations. The existing logic had the following behavior:
* Calling SetIsFinishedTransition for newly-finished transitions.
This is no longer needed since by this point all consumers of
IsFinishedTransition have been updated to use alternative means for testing
if an animation is relevant.
* Setting transitionStartedOrEnded to true so that we would post an animation
restyle.
We can achieve this same effect by simplying updating the canThrottleTick
flag using the result of calling Animation::CanThrottle on each animation.
Animation::CanThrottle will return false for a newly-started or
newly-finished animation (it returns false for a newly-started animation
since the animation's mIsRunningOnCompositor flag won't yet be true at that
point.)
* Updating the animation generation for newly-started and newly-finished
animations in order to trigger a layer update.
At least that appears to be the intention of this code. However, it currently
has no effect since the animation generation on the pres context is not
incremented in any context I could find where a newly started/finished
animation might be detected.
For this third case, this patch adds tests to ensure that transitions are
correctly added and removed from the compositor when they start and finish.
This is because most of the existing tests in test_animations_omta.html cover
only CSS animations.
As noted in the comments in the test, if a tick lands at the exact beginning of
a transition we will typically not send it to the layer until the following tick
because the RestyleManager will filter out the seemingly redundant change (i.e.
no change to the computed style). Presumably updating the animation generation
was intended to avoid this.
This same behavior is true of CSS animations (and the same kind of comment
appears elsewhere in test_animations_omta.html). Long-term this is probably
worth fixing so that when a transition is triggered we get it to the compositor
one tick earlier which should improve responsiveness when the main thread is
busy and the interval between ticks is long. Furthermore, we should do the same
for both all type of animations, not just transitions.
Currently, however, this patch preserves the existing behavior and helps narrow
the difference between transitions and animations so we can apply this
optimization to both.
This patch generalizes the logic in
nsTransitionManager::PruneCompletedTransitions to consider all transitions that
are no longer current (i.e. not running or scheduled to run) rather than
those marked as finished.
Of particular note, this patch removes the check for finished transitions in
the case when we can't animate the current change. This case occurs when either
we have a non-transition style change that happens to coincide with the current
transition value, or a style change to something we can't interpolate to. In
either case it's not clear why we would cancel the existing transition only if
it is still in motion and not if it is finished. It seems like it should be
cancelled in either case and hence this patch removes this check.
The other change relates to detecting reversing transitions. In this case we do
need to distinguish between transitions that have finished and those that have
not. For this purpose, checking if the animation is current should be
sufficient. (Note that comparing for PlayState() == Finished would not be enough
since we want to also exclude *idle*, i.e. cancelled, animations too.)
In StyleContextChanged, when we drop a transition, we also update the animation
generation, unless the transition is finished. This is so that we will update
animations on layers accordingly. For all intents and purposes this is
equivalent to only updating the animation generation if the animation is
current.
Even in the case where the transition has *just* finished, it will either
already be considered finished and the regular animation tick (which uses the
same refresh driver time as we see in StyleContextChanged) will have triggered
an unthrottled sample to take the animation off the compositor (since
Animation::CanThrottle detects newly finished animations), or it will be not yet
finished in which case HasCurrentEffect will return true. If anything changed
timing properties in the time between running the refresh driver tick and
calling StyleContextChanged (such as seeking the Animation) it will also trigger
a layer update.
This patch also removes an unncessary assertion in
ElementPropertyTransition::CurrentValuePortion. This functions operates
sensibly even for finished transitions (due to the way it manages the fill
mode). It is up to the call site to determine whether it should be calling this
function on a finished transition or not.
AnimationCollection::HasAnimationOfProperty uses IsFinishedTransition to filter
out transitions that should otherwise be ignored. This is used in the following
places:
1. nsLayoutUtils::HasAnimations
The is only used by nsIFrame::BuildDisplayListForStackingContext to see if
there are any opacity animations
For this case, simply returning *current* animations would be sufficient
(since finished but filling animations should have already filled in the
display opacity)
2. CommonAnimationManager::GetAnimationsForCompositor
This should really only return *current* animations--that is, animations that
are running or scheduled to run. Finished animations never run on the
compositor. Indeed, only *playing* animations run on the compositor but, as
we will see in some of the cases below, it is sometimes useful to know that
an animation *will* run on the compositor in the near future (e.g. so we can
pre-render content).
The places where GetAnimationsForCompositor is used are:
- When building layers to add animations to layers in nsDisplayList--in this
case we skip any animations that aren't playing so if
GetAnimationsForCompositor only returned current animations that would be
more than sufficient.
- In nsLayoutUtils::HasAnimationsForCompositor. This in turn is used:
- In ChooseScaleAndSetTransform to see if the transform is being animated
on the compositor. If so, it calls
nsLayoutUtils::ComputeSuitableScaleForAnimation (which also calls
GetAnimationsForCompositor) and passes the result to
GetMinAndMaxScaleForAnimationProperty which we have already adjusted in
part 4 of this patch series to only deal with *relevant* animations
Relevant animations include both current animations and in effect
animations but we don't run forwards-filling animations on the compositor
so GetAnimationsForCompositor should NOT return them. Current animations
should be enough. In fact, playing animations should be enough but we
might want to pre-render layers at a suitable size during their delay
phase so returning current animations is probably ok.
- In nsDisplayListBuilder::MarkOutOfFlowFrameForDisplay to add a fuzz
factor to the overflow rect for frames undergoing a transform animation
on the compositor. In this case too current animations should be
sufficient.
- In nsDisplayOpacity::NeedsActiveLayer to say "yes" if we are animating
opacity on the compositor. Presumably in this case it would be good to
say "yes" if the animation is in the delay phase too (as it currently
does). After the animation is finished, we should drop the layer, i.e.
current animations should be sufficient.
- In nsDisplayTransform::ShouldPrerenderTransformedContent. As with
nsDisplayOpacity::NeedsActiveLayer, we only need to pre-render
transformed content for animations that are current.
- In nsDisplayTransform::GetLayerState. As with
nsDisplayOpacity::NeedsActiveLayer, we only need to return active here
for current animations.
- In nsIFrame::IsTransformed. Here we test the display style to see if
there is a transform and also check if transform is being animated on the
compositor. As a result, we really only need HasAnimationsForCompositor
to return true for animations that are playing--otherwise the display
style will tell us if we're transformed or not. Returning true for all
current compositor animations (which is a superset of playing), however,
should not cause problems (we already return true for even more than
that).
- In nsIFrame::HasOpacityInternal which is much the same as
nsIFrame::IsTransformed and hence current should be fine.
3. AnimationCollection::CanThrottleAnimation
Here, HasAnimationOfProperty is used when looking for animations that would
disqualify us from throttling the animation by having an out-of-date layer
generation or being a transform animation that affects scroll and so requires
that we do the occasional main thread sample to update scrollbars.
It would seem like current animations are enough here too. One interesting
case is where we *had* a compositor animation but it has finished or been
cancelled. In that case, the animation won't be current and we should not
throttle the animation since we need to take it off its layer.
It turns out checking for current animations is still ok in this case too.
The reasoning is as follows:
- If the animation is newly-finished, we'll pick that up in
Animation::CanThrottle and return false then.
- If the animation is newly-idle then there are two cases:
If the cancelled animation was the only compositor animation then
AnimationCollection::CanPerformOnCompositorThread will notice that there
are no playing compositor animations and return false and
AnimationCollection::CanThrottleAnimation will never be called.
If there are other compositor animations running, then
AnimationCollection::CanThrottleAnimation will still return false because
whatever cancelled the animation will update the animation generation and
we'll notice the mismatch between the layer animation generation and the
animation generation on the collection.
Based on the above analysis it appears that making
AnimationCollection::HasAnimationOfProperty return only current animations (and
simulatneously renaming it to HasCurrentAnimationOfProperty) is safe. Indeed, in
effect, we already do this for transitions but not for animations. This patch
generalizes this behavior to all animations.
This patch also updates test_animations_omta.html since it was incorrectly
testing that a finished opacity animation was still running on the compositor.
Finished animations should not run on the compositor and the changes in this
patch cause that to happen. The reason we don't just update this test to check
for RunningOn.MainThread is that for opacity animations, unlike transform
animations, we can't detect if an opacity on a layer was set by animation or
not. As a result, for opacity animations we typically test the opacity on
either the main thread or compositor in order to allow for the case where an
animation-set opacity is still lingering on the compositor.
Daniel Holbert
Wes Kocher
Kartikaya Gupta
Nathan Froyd
Yury Delendik
Jonathan Kew
Ting-Yu Lin
Benoit Girard
Mats Palmgren
Cameron McCormack
Mason Chang
Markus Stange
Ryan VanderMeulen
Andrew Osmond
Brian Birtles
Ben Tian
William Chen
Ehsan Akhgari
Gijs Kruitbosch
Arthur Edelstein
Aryeh Gregor
Masayuki Nakano
L. David Baron
Xidorn Quan
Francois Marier
Ms2ger
Robert O'Callahan
Mike Hommey
Tom Tromey
Arnaud Bienner
Nick Robson
Birunthan Mohanathas
Kyle Huey
Neil Deakin
Phil Ringnalda
Brian Grinstead
Matt Woodrow
Lee Salzman