This patch was autogenerated by my decomponents.py
It covers almost every file with the extension js, jsm, html, py,
xhtml, or xul.
It removes blank lines after removed lines, when the removed lines are
preceded by either blank lines or the start of a new block. The "start
of a new block" is defined fairly hackily: either the line starts with
//, ends with */, ends with {, <![CDATA[, """ or '''. The first two
cover comments, the third one covers JS, the fourth covers JS embedded
in XUL, and the final two cover JS embedded in Python. This also
applies if the removed line was the first line of the file.
It covers the pattern matching cases like "var {classes: Cc,
interfaces: Ci, utils: Cu, results: Cr} = Components;". It'll remove
the entire thing if they are all either Ci, Cr, Cc or Cu, or it will
remove the appropriate ones and leave the residue behind. If there's
only one behind, then it will turn it into a normal, non-pattern
matching variable definition. (For instance, "const { classes: Cc,
Constructor: CC, interfaces: Ci, utils: Cu } = Components" becomes
"const CC = Components.Constructor".)
MozReview-Commit-ID: DeSHcClQ7cG
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : d9c41878036c1ef7766ef5e91a7005025bc1d72b
This patch does basically throttle animations on visibility:hidden element
and unthrottle it once the animating element became visible or a child of the
animating element became visible. But still there are some cases that we don't
throttle such animations perfectly. For example;
div.style.visibility = 'hidden'; // the 'div' has no children at this moment
div.animate(..);
// The animation is throttled
div.appendChild(visibleChild);
// The animation isn't throttled
visibleChild.style.visibility = 'hidden';
// Now the animation should be throttled again, but actually it's not.
To throttle this case properly, when the |visibleChild|'s visibility changed
to hidden, we would need to do either
1) Check all siblings of the |visibleChild| have no visible children
or
2) The parent element stores visible children count somewhere and decrease it
and check whether the count is zero
To achieve 1) we need to walk up ancestors and their siblings, actually it's
inefficient.
2) is somewhat similar to what we already do for animating images but it's hard
to reuse it for CSS animations since it does not take into account that
descendants' visibilities.
Another example that this patch does not optimize is the the case where
animating element has children whose visibility is inherited and the element
itself initially visible something like this;
let child = document.createElement('div'); // child visibility is 'inherit'
div.appendChild(child);
div.animate(..); // the 'div' is visible
// The animation isn't throttled since the animating element is visible
div.style.visiblily = 'hidden';
// Now the animation should be throttled, but it's not since this patch does
// not descend down all descendants to check they are invisible or not when the
// animating element visibility changed to hidden.
This patch adds a test case for this case introduced with todo_is().
Another test case added in this patch fails if we don't use
nsPlaceholderFrame::GetRealFrameFor() in HasNoVisibleDescendants().
MozReview-Commit-ID: BJwzQvP9Yc4
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : ceb95bdce1042cbfc16751d6d023fc6feee5845e
This new change hint doesn't influence layout so that it can be regarded
as nsChangeHint_Hints_CanIgnoreIfNotVisible. Note that if visibility changed
from collapse or to collapse, we set NS_STYLE_HINT_REFLOW separetely.
MozReview-Commit-ID: AirDWeBYVKG
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 1cd03a78a522b1a6965ba73ebf002ddacb0ab4f2
All the arrays we're switching to ranged loops can't mutate during the loop
since are locals or not referenced from other places.
MozReview-Commit-ID: C2N73HMMeNW
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 428dd2805cb58b3ac5fcddb549b960f72615bf6f
Just something I noticed while sneaking into bug 1435634.
RemoveElement returns whether the element was actually removed, so no need to
use Contains to bail out.
MozReview-Commit-ID: FryHBV66yRV
Bug 1427292 broke display: contents on non-special MathML elements.
Just for reference, I've manually audited calls to nsIFrame::GetContent() in
MathML and turns out that MathML is pretty well-behaved in that sense (it
inspects the frame tree, then gets the content), so it should work fine with
display: contents / ShadowDOM.
Only exception to that is[1], but that one seems harmless.
[1]: https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/eeb7190f9ad6f1a846cd6df09986325b3f2c3117/layout/mathml/nsMathMLmactionFrame.cpp#301
So we can enable or implement when the CSSWG pleases.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 8N6kiGyjE4i
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : a80197e39b20bc6ab385a3d0b90628bc4ad81d92
It's the last thing we check before looking into the array, modulo other two
tags, so there should be no need for something more fancy.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 4Wi1fe7jBlN
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : c13394a0b057e28cd922f1d15cb8b149a4204292
I left some IgnoredErrorResults for now where people warn on failure. We could
consider adding a WarnOnError() thing or something.
MozReview-Commit-ID: L5ttZ9CGKg0
Everything that needs them up-to-date will call flush appropriately, there
should be no need to do it manually.
This way we coalesce all the stylist updates until the next style flush in the
best case, or until one of the consumers actually needs them.
MozReview-Commit-ID: BVsxXxhtcKL
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : a41c14689fdcdb30935e16bdb0e757e7140e88e7
This was done using the following script:
37e3803c7a/processors/chromeutils-import.jsm
MozReview-Commit-ID: 1Nc3XDu0wGl
--HG--
extra : source : 12fc4dee861c812fd2bd032c63ef17af61800c70
extra : intermediate-source : 34c999fa006bffe8705cf50c54708aa21a962e62
extra : histedit_source : b2be2c5e5d226e6c347312456a6ae339c1e634b0
The accessible caret manager is owned by the event hub, that is owned by the
shell.
All the callers of methods that call FlushLayout on the AccessibleCaretManager
should hold an external reference to the event hub.
Flushing pending notifications can run arbitrary script, that can call Destroy()
on the pres shell (and thus tear down the accessible caret event hub, and the
manager with him).
I don't know why before my change this wasn't crashing badly, but the code as it
was just doesn't look sound to me at all either (maybe I'm misunderstanding
something and I should just revert that patch and give up on having nice
invariants during our flushes..., but I don't think it's the case).
This also adds some sanity-checking that we don't die under our flush.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 4s0UT0fD3TI
See 7.6. in the section '8.1.4.2 Processing model';
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/webappapis.html#processing-model-8
Note that this dispatching scroll events should be done after we process
WillRefresh() for FlushType::Style observers since main-thread scroll
animations is one of the FlushType::Style observers, that means it affects
scroll events.
Also test_scroll_event_ordering.html was modified to check scroll events happen
before requestAnimationFrame callbacks.
MozReview-Commit-ID: LuV157XoRkJ
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : a22424c248dcd4a3ec0aad8e71b75306c8f7e487
This was done using the following script:
37e3803c7a/processors/chromeutils-import.jsm
MozReview-Commit-ID: 1Nc3XDu0wGl
--HG--
extra : source : 12fc4dee861c812fd2bd032c63ef17af61800c70
Andrew McCreight
Hiroyuki Ikezoe
Narcis Beleuzu
Noemi Erli
Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Gerald Squelart
Florian Quèze
Boris Zbarsky
Csoregi Natalia
Cameron McCormack
Cosmin Sabou
Miko Mynttinen
Kris Maglione
Gurzau Raul
Phil Ringnalda
Matt Woodrow