There's a test for add_task() in selftest.py called ADD_TASK_MULTIPLE, which tests if
multiple add_task() tests are working. The test added in this commit does the exact same
except without run_test(). Since the original tests included this, I thought it would make
a good case for checking if the removal of run_test() is working as expected. Please remove
if this is unnecessary.
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : f6617259056db7ac7a658a89063694f51408b8ce
Since the simple test cases before this bug had cases for both passing and
failing, it would be a good idea to follow suit and add similar failing tests
for when run_test() is omitted.
Like the other simple tests defined in selftest.py, SIMPLE_FAILING_TEST,
ADD_TEST_FAILING, etc., it follows a similar pattern except these are done
without run_test() defined.
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : a1ef9a7b9e8274fe981864c5e021c80d2d66f7ec
Four new test cases have been added to testing/xpcshell/selftest.py.
These new tests check that tests where run_test() is not defined
work properly.
The test cases check the following cases:
1. when only add_test() is used.
2. when only add_task() is used.
3. when both add_task() and add_test() is used.
4. when a test file is empty, i.e. contains no add_test(), add_task() or
run_test().
Test bodies only consist of do_check_true(true) calls to make up a minimal
test without run_test() in the same vein as the other simple tests defined
previously.
Also, broke a comment up that was too long.
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 48d055680ba8108816ecbe07008496c5281f46cc
As referenced in Bug 982852, this fix makes run_tests() optional.
Test cases can now consist of add_test() and add_task() calls
without the need to exclusively set up a run_test() just to call
run_next_test() inside it. If run_test() however is defined, it
will be called directly as usual, which should keep all older
tests working without breaking.
Since most run_test() calls right now are mostly boilerplate and
usually are of the form -- function run_test(){run_next_test();} --
this fix checks if run_test is defined by using the typeof operator
which should evaluate to "function" if it is defined. If defined,
it is called straight away, otherwise, run_next_test() is called,
which is what run_test() usually does when used as a set up to
call tests registered by add_test() and add_task().
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 7cfbf30a67e3a8d088f8409edcdde8976f46b941
This is for aurora (dev edition) compatibility. In this channel, there is a
selected lightweight theme by default. Tests don't expect this to be the case
so this simply resets the relevant prefs for mochitests and xpcshell tests.
Rather than attempting to bind non-functions and catching the exception this
explicitly checks if it is a function. This helps reduce memory consumption
needed for the exception stack traces. Realistically that will go away when GC
is run, but it throws off memory measurments prior to that.
Shian-Yow Wu
Ryan VanderMeulen
Krishnashish Gogoi
Felipe Gomes
Phil Ringnalda
jlal@mozilla.com
Christoph Kerschbaumer
James Graham
Joel Maher
Andrew Halberstadt
Bob Clary
Tom Tromey
Wes Kocher
Jonathan Griffin
Georg Fritzsche
Randall Barker
Carsten "Tomcat" Book
Brian Grinstead
Eric Rahm
Mike Conley
J. Ryan Stinnett
Neil Deakin
Andrea Marchesini