This was automatically generated by the script modeline.py.
MozReview-Commit-ID: BgulzkGteAL
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : a4b9d16a4c06c4e85d7d85f485221b1e4ebdfede
The WD-06 (and later) WebAuthn specs choose to move to integer algorithm
identifiers for the signatures [1], with a handful of algorithms identified [2].
U2F devices only support ES256 (e.g., COSE ID "-7"), so that's all that is
implemented here.
Note that the spec also now requires that we accept empty lists of parameters,
and in that case, the RP says they aren't picky, so this changes what happens
when the parameter list is empty (but still aborts when the list is non-empty
but doesn't have anything we can use) [3].
There's a follow-on to move parameter-validation logic into the U2FTokenManager
in Bug 1409220.
[1] https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#dictdef-publickeycredentialparameters
[2] https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#alg-identifier
[3] https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#createCredential bullet #12
MozReview-Commit-ID: KgL7mQ9u1uq
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 2a1767805779a9f8049102723011193f113f0713
Andrew McCreight
J.C. Jones