This is a best effort attempt at ensuring that the adverse impact of
reformatting the entire tree over the comments would be minimal. I've used a
combination of strategies including disabling of formatting, some manual
formatting and some changes to formatting to work around some clang-format
limitations.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D13371
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Clang format does not always reflow comments correctly to get them
within 80 columns.
The major categories of failures I have noticed in xpcom/ are:
- Comments that are lists. I fixed these by manually getting them so
they'll be within 80 columns after clang-format runs.
- Comments intermixed with lists of things like enums, initializers,
or even fields in a class. It doesn't seem to associate the comment
with the item in the list correctly. The worst cases of these happen
when it changes initializer lists from having commas at the start of
each item to having them at the end. In the initializer comma cases,
I fixed them by making the commas at the end, so clang-format won't
mix things up. For other cases, I often moved the comment for an
item onto its own line, because it was not possible to have both the
comment and the item on the same line and stay within 80 columns.
- One odd case is nsEnumeratorUtils.cpp, where the end of line comment
after a NS_DECL macro confused clang-format and made it stop
realizing that the NS_DECL thing was a complete statement. I also
added a blank line to that file before a declaration because I think
that is better.
Depends on D13183
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D13184
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
(Unless there were other profiler actions, as I'm not sure yet whether it would
be safe to skip them when the profiler is paused; another bug should
investigate that.)
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D11308
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Potentially, if the watcher notification task failed to dispatch, we would have a cycle left between the WatchManager and the OwnerType
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D11857
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Sometimes when we call ShutdownWithTimeout on a thread pool, the unresponsive
thread that we leak will actually complete before the main thread is done.
In that case, the thread will dereference the thread shutdown context, so
we must intentionally leak it too.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D10645
This method is necessary because some threads might be stuck making blocking
calls. This means the thread is not processing any events, and we're unable
to safely terminate it. Our solution here is to leak the stuck threads
instead of waiting for them and potentially causing a shutdown hang.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D9601
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Instead of creating a timer and then setting the timer's target, we can
determine the timer's target and pass it in directly when the timer is
created. This reordering of steps is slightly more efficient, since
SetTarget() is both a virtual call and requires locking, both of which
can be skipped if we know the target at timer creation time. If we're
reusing the timer, we also don't need to repeatedly set the timer's
target: we can set the target once at timer creation, and then be done.
We can do this safely here because mTaskCategory doesn't change
throughout the life of the IdleTaskRunner; we make mTaskCategory `const`
to make this more explicit to the reader.
The NS_NewTimer* family of functions, when using a custom event target,
currently go through a path that looks something like:
auto timer = createTimer()
timer->SetTarget(target);
// call the requisite Init* function
return timer;
This setup is inefficient, because SetTarget requires the timer mutex to
be acquired. The mutex acquisition here is completely unnecessary,
because the timer hasn't yet been shared out to the wider world; we can
set the timer target without acquiring the mutex at all because we know
that no sharing is possible at this point.
This patch reworks things somewhat to make that possible.
If class A is derived from class B, then an instance of class A can be
converted to B via a static cast, so a slower QI is not needed.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D6861
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This doesn't fix the problem, but at least moves the resulting assertion
closer to the problematic caller, and makes it easier to diagnose.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D7042
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 4a016d1dce77a269b886467c9343dab125079a8f
extra : amend_source : 4e9133e70932f382e0b5df9e487978b95d05781b
These maps hold strong references which complicate nsThread lifetime handling
considerably, and only have a couple of fringe uses. We have a linked list of
active threads that the thread manager can use for its internal enumeration
purposes, and the external uses are easily done away with, so there doesn't
seem to be much reason to keep the map around.
MozReview-Commit-ID: x7dsj6C4x8
--HG--
extra : source : 5f870621361012ba459943212d8c68a9ff81cb16
extra : intermediate-source : 89a0c0874d400dd324df6fc3627c0c47d130df19
extra : histedit_source : bbd7900e3d754bde925a411c10aa30a1d6e22edd
Most of the times when we automatically create nsThread wrappers for threads
that don't already have them, we don't actually need the event targets, since
those threads don't run XPCOM event loops. Aside from wasting memory, actually
creating these event loops can lead to leaks if a thread tries to dispatch a
runnable to the queue which creates a reference cycle with the thread.
Not creating the event queues for threads that don't actually need them helps
avoid those foot guns, and also makes it easier to figure out which treads
actually run XPCOM event loops.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Arck4VQqdne
--HG--
extra : source : a03a61d6d724503c3b7c5e31fe32ced1f5d1c219
extra : intermediate-source : 5152af6ab3e399216ef6db8f060c257b2ffbd330
extra : histedit_source : ef06000344416e0919f536d5720fa979d2d29c66%2C4671676b613dc3e3ec762edf5d72a2ffbe6fca3f
These maps hold strong references which complicate nsThread lifetime handling
considerably, and only have a couple of fringe uses. We have a linked list of
active threads that the thread manager can use for its internal enumeration
purposes, and the external uses are easily done away with, so there doesn't
seem to be much reason to keep the map around.
MozReview-Commit-ID: x7dsj6C4x8
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 897e2d32d1dfee24d51459065925fb9b41fa543a
extra : source : 5f870621361012ba459943212d8c68a9ff81cb16
Most of the times when we automatically create nsThread wrappers for threads
that don't already have them, we don't actually need the event targets, since
those threads don't run XPCOM event loops. Aside from wasting memory, actually
creating these event loops can lead to leaks if a thread tries to dispatch a
runnable to the queue which creates a reference cycle with the thread.
Not creating the event queues for threads that don't actually need them helps
avoid those foot guns, and also makes it easier to figure out which treads
actually run XPCOM event loops.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Arck4VQqdne
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : fcf8fa50e748c4b54c3bb1997575d9ffd4cbaae1
extra : source : a03a61d6d724503c3b7c5e31fe32ced1f5d1c219
These maps hold strong references which complicate nsThread lifetime handling
considerably, and only have a couple of fringe uses. We have a linked list of
active threads that the thread manager can use for its internal enumeration
purposes, and the external uses are easily done away with, so there doesn't
seem to be much reason to keep the map around.
MozReview-Commit-ID: x7dsj6C4x8
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 88c56fa4f5da97f33ade08d892c3d8c42666307e
Most of the times when we automatically create nsThread wrappers for threads
that don't already have them, we don't actually need the event targets, since
those threads don't run XPCOM event loops. Aside from wasting memory, actually
creating these event loops can lead to leaks if a thread tries to dispatch a
runnable to the queue which creates a reference cycle with the thread.
Not creating the event queues for threads that don't actually need them helps
avoid those foot guns, and also makes it easier to figure out which treads
actually run XPCOM event loops.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Arck4VQqdne
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 02c5572b92ee48c11697d90941336e10c03d49cf
Jean-Yves Avenard
Sylvestre Ledru
Ehsan Akhgari
Andrew McCreight
Gabriele Svelto
Gerald Squelart
Coroiu Cristina
Yaron Tausky
Eric Rahm
Brian Hackett
shindli
Valentin Gosu
Jim Blandy
Nathan Froyd
Randell Jesup
Jonathan Kew
Bogdan Tara
Kris Maglione
Narcis Beleuzu
Noemi Erli
Christian Holler
Daniel Holbert