In original design, payment method response data is passed between processes
through a simple nsString. It means a special encoder/decoder is needed for
special response data, ex. BasicCardResponse, to serialize/deserialize
into/from the nsString. However, when a token spliter, ':', ';' and '@', is
used in response data, it makes the encoder/decoder can not work normally.
It is hard to define a suitable token spliter set for encoder/decoder.
So instead of using an error-prone encoder/decoder, this patch defining a new
IPC structure for response data.
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 4972033516bc861ea3f975a27b7688fc6eb89a94
1. Add PaymentValidationErrors and PayerErrorFields in PaymentRequest.webidl
and PaymentResponse.retry() in PaymentResponse.webidl
2. Implement PaymentRequest.retryPayment() and
PaymentRequestManager.retryPayment() in content process.
3. Add IPCPaymentRetryActionRequest in PPaymentRequest.ipdl to transfer the
error fields to chrome process.
4. Implement PaymentResponse.retry() by reusing the code of show() and
updateWith() of PaymentRequestService in chrome process.
1. Checking if the PaymentRequest::mState equals to eInteractive when calling
PaymentRequest::UpdatePayment() and PaymentRequest::AbortUpdate.
2. Removing the non-suitable MOZ_ASSERT in PaymentRequest::RespondShowPayment()
1. Returning NS_ERROR_FAILURE in PaymentRequestService::RespondPayment() when
the specified PaymentRequest does not exist in PaymentRequestService.
2. Renaming "cleanup" to "close" in DOM::WebPayment codes to fit the actual
behavior.
Let PaymentRequest inherit from nsIDocumentActivity interface.
Calling RegisterActivityObserver() and UnregisterActivityObserver() in
constructor and destructor to get activity notifications from document.
When receiving the notification, NotifyOwnerDocumentActivityChanged() will
check the owner document's activity status. If the status is disabled, calling
PaymentRequestManager::CleanupPayment() to cleanup the PaymentRequest in
content process and aslo sending the cleanup information to chrome process.
We only build the frontend parts of Web Payments on Nightly, but users could
futz with the prefs and expose the DOM API on Beta. We should be careful about
not allowing that mismatch.
This also adds some additional logging if we run into a bug like this again.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 9qcQTIsIHkg
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : cdaed71d79e6f8cedd1229ffd03cac21e3660367
If we end up shutting down the content process while there's a request active
we'll end up "leaking" the request and asserting. This makes sure that we
let go of the PaymentRequest in that edge case. I can cause this by forceably
closing the payment request window on Linux without hitting OK or cancel.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 6XDYIcqNkC6
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : d20d8fae4aa4fc3afcca8491d415c64b8af8bcb4
The existing code only passed strings around to identify PaymentRequest
objects. That meant that we were constantly having to do hashtable lookups to
find the corresponding object. This patch just uses the single map that IPDL
maintains for us and passes objects around, obviating the need for more
hashtable lookups.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 6BBonrc6q4x
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 041c6ce742d60a2c9e954a58582d09cd9ef7f2b1
There isn't any need to create an actor per call to the parent. This patch
lines up PaymentRequest with PPaymentRequestChild objects and links them
together. It also simplifies the maps and arrays we use to keep track of these
objects.
There's one tricky bit to note in this patch: in the case that a promise is
passed to paymentRequest.show(), we don't notify the parent process until the
promise resolves (when we call either UpdatePayment or AbortUpdate). In that
case, I needed to distinguish between an "update" because of the promise
resolving or a call to updateWith on an shippingaddresschange event in order
to get the bookkeeping right with the mActivePayments hashtable. In that case,
the PaymentRequest is kept alive by mShowingRequest alone. In all other cases,
mActivePayments keeps the PaymentRequest alive until we resolve or reject the
correct promise.
MozReview-Commit-ID: HoHjn8eqC4T
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 4da1d65d1f791f4a5c18871ab3a3dcf94e833b90
This removes some hard tabs that crept in and combines two if branches into a
single statement in order to avoid a bit of duplication.
The existing code here seems to treat any sort of upcast as needing a QI. That
is needlessly wasteful and causes a bunch of unneeded virtual calls.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7WshYm9C4Xb
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : bc7b1b5157324158f627efd8dff54f078488f4fc
1. Add "optional Promise<PaymentDetailsUpdate> detailsPromise" as a parameter
of PaymentRequest.show() in PaymentRequest.webidl.
2. Let PaymentRequest inherit from PromiseNativeHandler, and implement the
ResolvedCallback() and RejectedCallback() to handle the PaymentDetailsUpdate
promise.
3. Update PaymentRequest.show() implementation. If PaymentDetailsUpdate Promise
is not nullptr, the show request would not be transferred to chrome process
immediately until the promise is resolved/rejected.
4. Update selectedShippingOption when requestShipping is true.
5. Change the PaymentMethod id validation sequence according to the spec.
--HG--
extra : histedit_source : e591c759037cce4f66701b2faa5ecbe01c00e246
Add a new member mAllowPaymentRequest on nsIDocument and following related
methods,
bool AllowPaymentRequest() const
void SetAllowPaymentRequest(bool aAllowPaymentRequest)
mAllowPaymentRequest is used to check if PaymentRequest is allowed to use on
the document. According to the spec
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/iframe-embed-object.html#allowed-to-use
the mAllowPaymentRequest should be true under following situations
1. The document is the top level content document.
2. The document is the same origin with its parent document and its parent
document's mAllowPaymentRequest is true.
3. The document is different origin with its parent document but its
parent node is an iframe with allowpaymentrequest flag and the parent
document's mAllowPaymentRquest is true.
This patch also include following mochitests
1. test for allowpaymentrequest flag changing. The flag change effect should
not be applied to the document immediately, it should be updated while
the browsing context is updated.
2. test for effect propagation in the nested iframe.
This was automatically generated by the script modeline.py.
MozReview-Commit-ID: BgulzkGteAL
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : a4b9d16a4c06c4e85d7d85f485221b1e4ebdfede
1. PaymentRequest::PrefEnabled() returns false under non-e10s situation.
2. Add a new mochitest test_block_none10s.html to expect to get ReferenceError
in non-e10s mode.
This patch implements payment method identifier validation algorithm
according to the spec https://w3c.github.io/payment-method-id/.
The steps to validate a payment method identifier with a string pmi are
given by the following algorithm. It returns true if the pmi is valid.
1. Let url be the result of running the basic URL parser with pmi.
2. If url is failure, validate a standardized payment method identifier with
pmi and return the result.
3. Otherwise, validate a URL-based payment method identifier passing url and
return the result.
This patch implements the following changes according to the spec change.
See https://w3c.github.io/payment-request/#constructor step 8 for more
details.
1. Return TypeError during PaymentRequest construction with duplicate
shippingOption id.
2. Set PaymentRequest.shippingOption with the selected shippingOption only
if options.requestShipping is true.
This patch implements currency validation algorithm according to the spec
https://w3c.github.io/payment-request/#validity-checkers.
1. amount.currencySystem must be "urn:iso:std:iso:4217".
2. amount.currency is valid with following criteria
1. The currency length must be 3.
2. The currency contains any character that must be in the range "A" to
"Z"(U+0041 to U+005A) or the range "a" to "z"(U+0061 to U+007A).
According to the spec, converting the currency to upper case and save it in
nsIPaymentRequest.
Replace it with NS_INTERFACE_MAP_BEGIN_CYCLE_COLLECTION, because it
has been the same for a while.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 5agRGFyUry1
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 5388c56b2f6905c6ef969150f0c5b77bf247624d
1. Create a new action response status PAYMENT_NOTSUPPORTED and get rid of
unnecessary method isAccpeted() from nsIPaymentActionResponse.idl.
2. Create canMakePayment() in PaymentRequestService and run it before
launching UI. If canMakePayment() returns false, send PAYMENT_NOTSUPPORTED
back to content process.
3. If chrome process returns PAYMENT_NOTSUPPORTED when calling showPayment(),
throw NotSupportedError DOMException to merchant side.
Getting the top level document's principal when constructing PaymentRequest,
then sending it to chrome process and saving it in nsIPaymentRequest.
Creating a new readonly attribute nsIPrincipal topLevelPrincipal in
nsIPaymentRequest for UI to query the top level document's principal
information.
Diego Pino Garcia
Eden Chuang
Brindusan Cristian
Marcos Cáceres
Andrea Marchesini
arthur.iakab
Matthew Noorenberghe
shindli
Marcos Cáceres
Eden Chuang
Jeff Gilbert
Blake Kaplan
Boris Zbarsky
Jonathan Guillotte-Blouin
Henri Sivonen
Andreea Pavel
Andrew McCreight
Masatoshi Kimura