Fairly straightforward, just a blanket removal. Haven't heard
anything on dev-platform or fx-data-dev regarding this removal,
so I think it's likely safe to remove on Nightly, and we can
revert if anyone makes a fuss.
As part of removing the HangMonitor, I renamed a few things and
reorganized the namespaces to not depend on a HangMonitor
namespace. Hopefully this doesn't produce too much noise in the
diff, it just seemed appropriate to move everything around
rather than keep dangling vestiges of the old system.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 8C8NFnOP5GU
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 59e4a6ced7d14d2a01c0b79e944078ea84cae523
Fairly straightforward, just a blanket removal. Haven't heard
anything on dev-platform or fx-data-dev regarding this removal,
so I think it's likely safe to remove on Nightly, and we can
revert if anyone makes a fuss.
As part of removing the HangMonitor, I renamed a few things and
reorganized the namespaces to not depend on a HangMonitor
namespace. Hopefully this doesn't produce too much noise in the
diff, it just seemed appropriate to move everything around
rather than keep dangling vestiges of the old system.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 8C8NFnOP5GU
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : a8840bd26f4b01b756ffa72345ababb625048550
Properly enclose all relevant details of CPUUsageWatcher in ifdefs
which control whether it should be active or not. Additionally,
apparently clock_gettime is not defined on OSX prior to 10.12, so
this is failing to compile for OSX on the build server, but not
locally. However, clock_get_time and getrusage should cover our
use cases sufficiently.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Ffi6yXLb9gO
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 84f9cf3b2074883dc6fe6d5a50ff27ffdb008a4f
We would like to be able to see if a given hang in BHR occurred
under high CPU load, as this is an indication that the hang is
of less use to us, since it's likely that the external CPU use
is more responsible for it.
The way this works is fairly simple. We get the system CPU usage
on a scale from 0 to 1, and we get the current process's CPU
usage, also on a scale from 0 to 1, and we subtract the latter
from the former. We then compare this value to a threshold, which
is 1 - (1 / p), where p is the number of (virtual) cores on the
machine. This threshold might need to be tuned, so that we
require an entire physical core in order to not annotate the hang,
but for now it seemed the most reasonable line in the sand.
I should note that this considers CPU usage in child or parent
processes as external. While we are responsible for that CPU usage,
it still indicates that the stack we receive from BHR is of little
value to us, since the source of the actual hang is external to
that stack.
MozReview-Commit-ID: JkG53zq1MdY
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 16553a9b5eac0a73cd1619c6ee01fa177ca60e58
Andi-Bogdan Postelnicu
Cosmin Sabou
Doug Thayer
Dorel Luca
Sebastian Hengst
Tristan Bourvon
Chris Peterson