Граф коммитов

14 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Tobias Schneider 3880ddff03 Bug 1382327 - (reftest) Rename reftest-print to reftest-paged. r=dbaron
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : c4e47e2de8d615c77e7e9ce88f6b21c9d15c92e4
2017-07-26 22:53:46 -07:00
Bobby Holley a7ef58a9ab No Bug - Twiddle stylo reftest expectations some more. r=me
MozReview-Commit-ID: H1YoN7HpmO1
2017-02-25 17:58:53 -08:00
Cameron McCormack 90e83367ae Bug 1334768 - stylo: Test expectation adjustments for for 2017-02-09 merge. r=me
MozReview-Commit-ID: AhvCAu3NYrb
2017-02-09 21:11:09 +08:00
Markus Stange 6efd7c73b1 Bug 1298218 - Use DisplayItemClipChain for tracking clips on display items. r=mattwoodrow,tnikkel
This is the bulk of the changes.
 - DisplayItemScrollClip is removed. Instead, we will have 1) ActiveScrolledRoot
   and 2) DisplayItemClipChain.
 - ActiveScrolledRoot points to a scroll frame and allows traversing up the
   scroll frame chain.
 - DisplayItemClipChain is a linked list of clips, each clip being associated
   with the ActiveScrolledRoot that moves this clip.
 - Each display item has an ActiveScrolledRoot and a clip chain.
 - nsDisplayItem::GetClip returns the item of the clip chain that scrolls with
   the item's ASR. The separation between "regular clip" and "scroll clips"
   mostly goes away.
 - Tracking clips in the display list builder's clip state happens very
   similarly to how regular clips used to be tracked - there's a clip chain for
   content descendants and a clip chain for containing block descendants. These
   clip chains are intersected to create the combined clip chain.
 - There are strict rules for the ASR of a container item: A container item's
   ASR should be the innermost ASR which the item has finite clipped bounds with
   respect to.
 - At some point in the future, ASRs and AGRs should be reunified, but I haven't
   done that yet, because I needed to limit the scope of the change.

MozReview-Commit-ID: KYEpWY7qgf2

--HG--
extra : rebase_source : c727f6300a35463750639e165bfa37374c06b851
2017-01-31 17:07:35 -05:00
Cameron McCormack 9c4ea5685f Bug 1334768 - stylo: Back out 800030115d2e and 404506488cfb for being completely wrong due to bug 1334938.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 8CGTqmtlguT
2017-01-30 16:49:54 +08:00
Cameron McCormack 7805d4716e Bug 1334768 - stylo: Test expectation adjustments for 2017-01-29 merge.
MozReview-Commit-ID: FFmvs6SHIwW
2017-01-29 15:31:56 +08:00
Cameron McCormack d4d8ba1d5f Bug 1324624 - stylo: Mark currently failing crashtests with asserts-if(stylo,...). r=xidorn
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7iiwRwiQ8s4
2016-12-21 15:42:36 +08:00
Timothy Nikkel 764c490e8f Bug 1271714. Limit asserts annotations for crashtest to e10s only, cause that's where they happen. 2016-07-13 23:37:13 -05:00
Timothy Nikkel fa07f3610e Bug 1271714. Annotate expected asserts in layout/printing/crashtests/576878.xhtml. r=mstange
The asserts are:

###!!! ASSERTION: Bounds computation mismatch: 'mContainerBounds.IsEqualInterior(mAccumulatedChildBounds)', /layout/base/FrameLayerBuilder.cpp, line 4887
###!!! ASSERTION: bad aListVisibleBounds: 'r.GetBounds().IsEqualInterior(aListVisibleBounds)', /layout/base/nsDisplayList.cpp, line 1637

They happen because we have a wrap list item that contains an out of flow frame with no saved clip data. So the patch for this bug changes the scroll clip of the wrap list item from the scroll clip induced by the root scroll frame to the null scroll clip. All of the display items that the wrap list contains have the root scroll frame scroll clip, so this causes the scroll clipped bounds for the wrap list item to expand to the whole content area. These expanded bounds of the wrap list item get incorporated into the bounds of a parent transform item. Later the wrap list item is flattened away, and so it's no longer around to provide the expanded bounds, leading to the assertions.

I've thought through options like changing how scroll clipped bounds work for wrap list items, but I can't seem to find any solution that would be consistent. The best thing would be to get the proper clip on out of flows we are going to descend into, but I can't think of a good way to do that either in this case (or in general).
2016-07-13 01:08:17 -05:00
Carsten "Tomcat" Book 03c1f7755c Backed out changeset e0e8a6311551 (bug 1271714) 2016-07-13 09:23:55 +02:00
Timothy Nikkel f1af296166 Bug 1271714. Annotate expected asserts in layout/printing/crashtests/576878.xhtml. r=mstange
The asserts are:

###!!! ASSERTION: Bounds computation mismatch: 'mContainerBounds.IsEqualInterior(mAccumulatedChildBounds)', /layout/base/FrameLayerBuilder.cpp, line 4887
###!!! ASSERTION: bad aListVisibleBounds: 'r.GetBounds().IsEqualInterior(aListVisibleBounds)', /layout/base/nsDisplayList.cpp, line 1637

They happen because we have a wrap list item that contains an out of flow frame with no saved clip data. So the patch for this bug changes the scroll clip of the wrap list item from the scroll clip induced by the root scroll frame to the null scroll clip. All of the display items that the wrap list contains have the root scroll frame scroll clip, so this causes the scroll clipped bounds for the wrap list item to expand to the whole content area. These expanded bounds of the wrap list item get incorporated into the bounds of a parent transform item. Later the wrap list item is flattened away, and so it's no longer around to provide the expanded bounds, leading to the assertions.

I've thought through options like changing how scroll clipped bounds work for wrap list items, but I can't seem to find any solution that would be consistent. The best thing would be to get the proper clip on out of flows we are going to descend into, but I can't think of a good way to do that either in this case (or in general).
2016-07-13 01:08:17 -05:00
Martijn Wargers 1772d0ff80 Bug 576878 - crash test 2013-05-18 18:38:34 +00:00
Martijn Wargers 43f024b1cf Bug 509839 - crash tests 2013-05-18 18:38:33 +00:00
Martijn Wargers 1ee53bc89d Bug 793844 - crash test 2013-05-13 16:28:29 +02:00