If no expired cookies exist, in order of preference, evict the oldest:
* session cookie with a non-matching path
* session cookie with a matching path
* non-session cookie with a non-matching path
* non-session cookie with a matching path
This replaces the previous heuristic of evicting the oldest cookie, irregardless of any other attributes,
if no expired cookies were present. This ensures that cookies that are already considered transient by
web applications will be removed first, followed by cookies that are unrelated to the response that is
adding new cookies.
* * *
Bug 1264192 - Interdiff
The functions aren't necessary now that we have BitwiseCast.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2nzOuwAop4Y
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 0cb2c16f484a81b2e77384564973b58ac2d10fb9
This change avoids lots of false positives for Coverity's CHECKED_RETURN
warning, caused by NS_WARN_IF's current use in both statement-style and
expression-style.
In the case where the code within the NS_WARN_IF has side-effects, I made the
following change.
> NS_WARN_IF(NS_FAILED(FunctionWithSideEffects()));
> -->
> Unused << NS_WARN_IF(NS_FAILED(FunctionWithSideEffects()));
In the case where the code within the NS_WARN_IF lacks side-effects, I made the
following change.
> NS_WARN_IF(!condWithoutSideEffects);
> -->
> NS_WARNING_ASSERTION(condWithoutSideEffects, "msg");
This has two improvements.
- The condition is not evaluated in non-debug builds.
- The sense of the condition is inverted to the familiar "this condition should
be true" sense used in assertions.
A common variation on the side-effect-free case is the following.
> nsresult rv = Fn();
> NS_WARN_IF_(NS_FAILED(rv));
> -->
> DebugOnly<nsresult rv> = Fn();
> NS_WARNING_ASSERTION(NS_SUCCEEDED(rv), "Fn failed");
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 58788245021096efa8372a9dc1d597a611d45611
If no expired cookies exist, in order of preference, evict the oldest:
* session cookie with a non-matching path
* session cookie with a matching path
* non-session cookie with a non-matching path
* non-session cookie with a matching path
This replaces the previous heuristic of evicting the oldest cookie, irregardless of any other attributes,
if no expired cookies were present. This ensures that cookies that are already considered transient by
web applications will be removed first, followed by cookies that are unrelated to the response that is
adding new cookies.
--HG--
extra : amend_source : f79ba9dd393a3f37760e643b10b7137e37a6397a
CloneOpenedToplevels, which is never called, is the only interesting
caller of CloneToplevel. And CloneToplevel, in turn, is the only
interesting caller of CloneManagees. Which means we can ditch all this
code for a decent amount of space savings, both in code and writable
static data (no more useless virtual function entries in vtables).
The new name makes the sense of the condition much clearer. E.g. compare:
NS_WARN_IF_FALSE(!rv.Failed());
with:
NS_WARNING_ASSERTION(!rv.Failed());
The new name also makes it clearer that it only has effect in debug builds,
because that's standard for assertions.
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 886e57a9e433e0cb6ed635cc075b34b7ebf81853
This function is an infallible alternative to nsIURI::GetSpec(). It's useful
when it's appropriate to handle a GetSpec() failure with a failure string, e.g.
for log/warning/error messages. It allows code like this:
nsAutoCString spec;
uri->GetSpec(spec);
printf("uri: %s", spec.get());
to be changed to this:
printf("uri: %s", uri->GetSpecOrDefault().get());
This introduces a slight behavioural change. Previously, if GetSpec() failed,
an empty string would be used here. Now, "[nsIURI::GetSpec failed]" will be
produced instead. In most cases this failure string will make for a clearer
log/warning/error message than the empty string.
* * *
Bug 1297961 (part 1b) - More GetSpecOrDefault() additions. r=hurley.
I will fold this into part 1 before landing.
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : ddc19a5624354ac098be019ca13cc24b99b80ddc